Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Benedikt Fecher

Biographic Data

ID6478540
NAMEBenedikt Fecher
GIVEN NAMESBenedikt
FAMILY NAMEFecher
SIGNATUREFECHER B
AFFILIATIONSAlexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society
ORCID0000-0002-0982-196X
VERIFIEDYes
TOTAL WORKS8
TOTAL CITATIONS0
WORKS AS AUTHOR8
WORKS AS EDITOR0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR2014
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2026
H-INDEX0
  • The engagement paradox

    Open Access•Tinca Lukan, Benedikt Fecher•ARTICLE•Journal of Science Communication•2026

    TikTok has become an increasingly important platform for communication, yet it remains understudied in science communication research. This commentary addresses this gap by discussing findings from an exploratory interview study with social scientists who actively communicate about science on TikTok. Drawing on in-depth, semi-structured interviews and one author's platform experience, we examine the types of hostility researchers encounter and ho…

  • Scholars Under Attack — Navigating the dark side of public engagement and science communication in a politicised (online) environment

    Open Access•Birte Fähnrich, Carla Almeida et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Science Communication•2026

  • Michael R. Müller / Jürgen Raab / Hans-Georg Soeffner (Hrsg.), Gewagtes Wissen

    Open Access•Benedikt Fecher•ARTICLE•Soziologische Revue•2025

  • Scientific policy advice on sustainable development

    Open Access•Nataliia Sokolovska, Anne Ellersiek et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Environmental Studies…•2024•References: 18

    This paper presents an in-depth case study about the Dialogue between Scientific Councils, also referred to as the Beirätedialog, which is a format for cross-sectoral science policy consulting on sustainable development in Germany. Set up to address current trends, it is designed to facilitate deliberation and collective knowledge creation between scientists and policymakers. Based on 4 years of participatory observation, we analyze to what exten…

  • Friend or foe? Exploring the implications of large language models on the science system

    Open Access•Benedikt Fecher, Marcel Hebing et al.•ARTICLE•AI & Society•2023

    The advent of ChatGPT by OpenAI has prompted extensive discourse on its potential implications for science and higher education. While the impact on education has been a primary focus, there is limited empirical research on the effects of large language models (LLMs) and LLM-based chatbots on science and scientific practice. To investigate this further, we conducted a Delphi study involving 72 researchers specializing in AI and digitization. The …

  • Setting up crowd science projects

    Open Access•Kaja Scheliga, Sascha Friesike et al.•ARTICLE•Public Understanding of Science•2018

    Crowd science is scientific research that is conducted with the participation of volunteers who are not professional scientists. Thanks to the Internet and online platforms, project initiators can draw on a potentially large number of volunteers. This crowd can be involved to support data-rich or labour-intensive projects that would otherwise be unfeasible. So far, research on crowd science has mainly focused on analysing individual crowd science…

  • Research Handbook on Digital Transformations

    Sascha Friesike, Francisco-Javier Olleros et al.•BOOK•Research Handbook on Digital…•2016

  • Open Science

    Open Access•Benedikt Fecher, Sascha Friesike•CHAPTER•Opening Science•2014

    Open Science is an umbrella term encompassing a multitude of assumptions about the future of knowledge creation and dissemination. Based on a literature review, this chapter aims at structuring the overall discourse by proposing five Open Science schools of thought: The infrastructure school (which is concerned with the technological architecture), the public school (which is concerned with the accessibility of knowledge creation), the measuremen…

No prominent works on this page.

  • Open Science

    Open Access•Benedikt Fecher, Sascha Friesike•CHAPTER•Opening Science•2014

    Open Science is an umbrella term encompassing a multitude of assumptions about the future of knowledge creation and dissemination. Based on a literature review, this chapter aims at structuring the overall discourse by proposing five Open Science schools of thought: The infrastructure school (which is concerned with the technological architecture), the public school (which is concerned with the accessibility of knowledge creation), the measuremen…

  • Research Handbook on Digital Transformations

    Sascha Friesike, Francisco-Javier Olleros et al.•BOOK•Research Handbook on Digital…•2016

  • Setting up crowd science projects

    Open Access•Kaja Scheliga, Sascha Friesike et al.•ARTICLE•Public Understanding of Science•2018

    Crowd science is scientific research that is conducted with the participation of volunteers who are not professional scientists. Thanks to the Internet and online platforms, project initiators can draw on a potentially large number of volunteers. This crowd can be involved to support data-rich or labour-intensive projects that would otherwise be unfeasible. So far, research on crowd science has mainly focused on analysing individual crowd science…

  • Friend or foe? Exploring the implications of large language models on the science system

    Open Access•Benedikt Fecher, Marcel Hebing et al.•ARTICLE•AI & Society•2023

    The advent of ChatGPT by OpenAI has prompted extensive discourse on its potential implications for science and higher education. While the impact on education has been a primary focus, there is limited empirical research on the effects of large language models (LLMs) and LLM-based chatbots on science and scientific practice. To investigate this further, we conducted a Delphi study involving 72 researchers specializing in AI and digitization. The …

  • Scientific policy advice on sustainable development

    Open Access•Nataliia Sokolovska, Anne Ellersiek et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Environmental Studies…•2024•References: 18

    This paper presents an in-depth case study about the Dialogue between Scientific Councils, also referred to as the Beirätedialog, which is a format for cross-sectoral science policy consulting on sustainable development in Germany. Set up to address current trends, it is designed to facilitate deliberation and collective knowledge creation between scientists and policymakers. Based on 4 years of participatory observation, we analyze to what exten…

  • Michael R. Müller / Jürgen Raab / Hans-Georg Soeffner (Hrsg.), Gewagtes Wissen

    Open Access•Benedikt Fecher•ARTICLE•Soziologische Revue•2025

  • The engagement paradox

    Open Access•Tinca Lukan, Benedikt Fecher•ARTICLE•Journal of Science Communication•2026

    TikTok has become an increasingly important platform for communication, yet it remains understudied in science communication research. This commentary addresses this gap by discussing findings from an exploratory interview study with social scientists who actively communicate about science on TikTok. Drawing on in-depth, semi-structured interviews and one author's platform experience, we examine the types of hostility researchers encounter and ho…

  • Scholars Under Attack — Navigating the dark side of public engagement and science communication in a politicised (online) environment

    Open Access•Birte Fähnrich, Carla Almeida et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Science Communication•2026

Computer Science (4 works) · Engineering (4 works) · Engineering ethics (4 works) · Political science (4 works) · Science communication (3 works) · Epistemology (2 works) · Open Source Software Innovations (2 works) · Pedagogy (2 works) · Psychology (2 works) · Public relations (2 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae