Serpil Karabüklü
Biographic Data
| ID | 6490086 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Serpil Karabüklü |
| GIVEN NAMES | Serpil |
| FAMILY NAME | Karabüklü |
| SIGNATURE | KARABÜKLÜ S |
| AFFILIATIONS | Purdue University |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-5221-4575 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 6 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 0 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 6 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2018 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2025 |
| H-INDEX | 0 |
Duration as a prosodic cue in TİD
Prosodic prominence of focused units reflected through a variety of cues, is well documented in all modalities. Yet, the effect of focus in the extended domain is understudied in sign languages. This paper, building on an experimental study on Turkish Sign Language (TİD), investigates prosodic strategies used in narrowly focused and broad focus conditions in an extended prosodic domain. We measured the duration of the signs and the proportion of …
Prosody of focus in Turkish Sign Language
Prosodic realization of focus has been a widely investigated topic across languages and modalities. Simultaneous focus strategies are intriguing to see how they interact regarding their functional and temporal alignment. We explored the multichannel (manual and nonmanual) realization of focus in Turkish Sign Language. We elicited data with focus type, syntactic roles and movement type variables from 20 signers. The results revealed the focus is e…
Simultaneity of certainty in Turkish Sign Language (TİD)
Non-manual Focus Markers in Turkish Sign Language
Sign languages use syntactic (fronting, doubling, clefting), manual manipulations (variation in size, length, speed, repetition), and nonmanual markers (head and eyebrow movements) to mark focus. Due to their simultaneous nature, they are well-known for using these strategies together. In this study, we examined how the focus is marked in Turkish Sign Language (TİD) in free conversations and elicited data. Both studies’ most observed nonmanual ma…
Marking various aspects in Turkish Sign Language
Sign languages have been reported to have manual signs that function as perfective morphemes ( Fischer & Gough 1999 ; Meir 1999 ; Rathmann 2005 ; Duffy 2007 ; Zucchi et al. 2010 ). Turkish Sign Language (TİD) has also been claimed to have such morphemes ( Zeshan 2003 ; Kubuş & Rathmann 2009 ; Dikyuva 2011 ; Gökgöz 2011 ; Karabüklü 2016 ) as well as a nonmanual completive marker (‘bn’) ( Dikyuva 2011 ). This study shows that the nonmanual ‘bn’ is …
Strategies to Express Time in a Tenseless Language
The studies on how time is expressed in TİD have different results: Gökgöz (2009) proposes that head nod is a tense morpheme while Arık (2012) and Dikyuva et al. (2015) claim that TİD is a morphologically tenseless language. This study shows that TİD is a morphologically tenseless language based on the occurrence of head nod with different verb types. It is also proposed that tense of a sentence is expressed via time adverbials and shown which sy…
No prominent works on this page.
Strategies to Express Time in a Tenseless Language
The studies on how time is expressed in TİD have different results: Gökgöz (2009) proposes that head nod is a tense morpheme while Arık (2012) and Dikyuva et al. (2015) claim that TİD is a morphologically tenseless language. This study shows that TİD is a morphologically tenseless language based on the occurrence of head nod with different verb types. It is also proposed that tense of a sentence is expressed via time adverbials and shown which sy…
Marking various aspects in Turkish Sign Language
Sign languages have been reported to have manual signs that function as perfective morphemes ( Fischer & Gough 1999 ; Meir 1999 ; Rathmann 2005 ; Duffy 2007 ; Zucchi et al. 2010 ). Turkish Sign Language (TİD) has also been claimed to have such morphemes ( Zeshan 2003 ; Kubuş & Rathmann 2009 ; Dikyuva 2011 ; Gökgöz 2011 ; Karabüklü 2016 ) as well as a nonmanual completive marker (‘bn’) ( Dikyuva 2011 ). This study shows that the nonmanual ‘bn’ is …
Non-manual Focus Markers in Turkish Sign Language
Sign languages use syntactic (fronting, doubling, clefting), manual manipulations (variation in size, length, speed, repetition), and nonmanual markers (head and eyebrow movements) to mark focus. Due to their simultaneous nature, they are well-known for using these strategies together. In this study, we examined how the focus is marked in Turkish Sign Language (TİD) in free conversations and elicited data. Both studies’ most observed nonmanual ma…
Prosody of focus in Turkish Sign Language
Prosodic realization of focus has been a widely investigated topic across languages and modalities. Simultaneous focus strategies are intriguing to see how they interact regarding their functional and temporal alignment. We explored the multichannel (manual and nonmanual) realization of focus in Turkish Sign Language. We elicited data with focus type, syntactic roles and movement type variables from 20 signers. The results revealed the focus is e…
Simultaneity of certainty in Turkish Sign Language (TİD)
Duration as a prosodic cue in TİD
Prosodic prominence of focused units reflected through a variety of cues, is well documented in all modalities. Yet, the effect of focus in the extended domain is understudied in sign languages. This paper, building on an experimental study on Turkish Sign Language (TİD), investigates prosodic strategies used in narrowly focused and broad focus conditions in an extended prosodic domain. We measured the duration of the signs and the proportion of …
Hearing Impairment and Communication (5 works) · Linguistics (5 works) · Mathematics (5 works) · Turkish (5 works) · Philosophy (4 works) · Computer Science (3 works) · Hand Gesture Recognition Systems (3 works) · Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies (3 works) · Psychology (3 works) · Sign language (3 works)