Deborah R Barnbaum
Biographic Data
| ID | 6501754 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Deborah R Barnbaum |
| GIVEN NAMES | Deborah R |
| FAMILY NAME | Barnbaum |
| SIGNATURE | BARNBAUM D R |
| AFFILIATIONS | Kent State University |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 3 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 0 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 3 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2000 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2004 |
| H-INDEX | 0 |
Bioethics , Ellen Frankel Paul, Fred D. Miller, Jr, and Jeffrey Paul, editors
"Making More Sense of "Minimal Risk
Some clarification is required to understand this definition. First, it should be clear that risk and harm are not the same concepts. Beauchamp and Childress note that harm is the normatively neutral sense of thwarting, defeating, or setting back the interests of one party by causes that include self-harming conditions as well as the (intentional or unintentional) actions of another party.3 Thus though they may not be bad in an absolute sense, ha…
The FDA's Proposal for Public Disclosure of Adverse Events in Gene Therapy Trials
In January 2001, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) proposed annual public disclosure of adverse events during gene therapy and xenotransplantation trials. The proposed policy raises the following questions: (1) Is the reformed policy in accord with the FDA's long-standing informed consent policies? (2) Why pair gene therapy trials and xenotransplantation trials in the revised guidelines? (3) Why single out these trials for public disclosure …
No prominent works on this page.
The FDA's Proposal for Public Disclosure of Adverse Events in Gene Therapy Trials
In January 2001, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) proposed annual public disclosure of adverse events during gene therapy and xenotransplantation trials. The proposed policy raises the following questions: (1) Is the reformed policy in accord with the FDA's long-standing informed consent policies? (2) Why pair gene therapy trials and xenotransplantation trials in the revised guidelines? (3) Why single out these trials for public disclosure …
"Making More Sense of "Minimal Risk
Some clarification is required to understand this definition. First, it should be clear that risk and harm are not the same concepts. Beauchamp and Childress note that harm is the normatively neutral sense of thwarting, defeating, or setting back the interests of one party by causes that include self-harming conditions as well as the (intentional or unintentional) actions of another party.3 Thus though they may not be bad in an absolute sense, ha…
Bioethics , Ellen Frankel Paul, Fred D. Miller, Jr, and Jeffrey Paul, editors
Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (2 works) · Ethics in Clinical Research (2 works) · Ethics in medical practice (2 works) · Law (2 works) · Political science (2 works) · Adverse effect (1 work) · Alternative medicine (1 work) · Bioethics (1 work) · Clinical trial (1 work) · Computer Science (1 work)