Jennifer Iriti
Biographic Data
| ID | 6504420 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Jennifer Iriti |
| GIVEN NAMES | Jennifer |
| FAMILY NAME | Iriti |
| SIGNATURE | IRITI J |
| AFFILIATIONS | University of Pittsburgh |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-5703-9948 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 5 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 2 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 5 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2005 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2025 |
| H-INDEX | 1 |
Building educators' confidence and skill in improvement science
Networked Improvement Communities (NICs) are a promising strategy for professional learning and educational change. However, limited empirical research has quantitatively examined how network participation cultivates educators' improvement science capacities. This study draws on four years of longitudinal data from the STEM PUSH Network—a NIC designed to broaden participation in STEM through collaboration with leaders of pre-college STEM programs…
Adapting improvement science tools and routines to build racial equity in out-of-school time STEM spaces
Over the past two decades, networked improvement communities (NICs) have become popular for their collaborative, evidence-based approaches to enduring educational challenges. However, traditional improvement science has had inconsistent focus and efficacy in working on issues of racial equity. This study examines the integration of equity into improvement science through the case of the STEM PUSH Network, an NSF-funded alliance aimed at increasin…
Subtraction by addition
Place-based scholarships
Using Recommendations in Evaluation
Is it appropriate and useful for evaluators to use findings to make recommendations? If so, under what circumstances? How specific should they be? This article presents a decision-making framework for the appropriateness of recommendations in varying contexts. On the basis of reviews of evaluation theory, selected evaluation reports, and feedback from American Evaluation Association presentations, the authors present a description of contextual v…
Place-based scholarships
Using Recommendations in Evaluation
Is it appropriate and useful for evaluators to use findings to make recommendations? If so, under what circumstances? How specific should they be? This article presents a decision-making framework for the appropriateness of recommendations in varying contexts. On the basis of reviews of evaluation theory, selected evaluation reports, and feedback from American Evaluation Association presentations, the authors present a description of contextual v…
Using Recommendations in Evaluation
Is it appropriate and useful for evaluators to use findings to make recommendations? If so, under what circumstances? How specific should they be? This article presents a decision-making framework for the appropriateness of recommendations in varying contexts. On the basis of reviews of evaluation theory, selected evaluation reports, and feedback from American Evaluation Association presentations, the authors present a description of contextual v…
Place-based scholarships
Adapting improvement science tools and routines to build racial equity in out-of-school time STEM spaces
Over the past two decades, networked improvement communities (NICs) have become popular for their collaborative, evidence-based approaches to enduring educational challenges. However, traditional improvement science has had inconsistent focus and efficacy in working on issues of racial equity. This study examines the integration of equity into improvement science through the case of the STEM PUSH Network, an NSF-funded alliance aimed at increasin…
Subtraction by addition
Building educators' confidence and skill in improvement science
Networked Improvement Communities (NICs) are a promising strategy for professional learning and educational change. However, limited empirical research has quantitatively examined how network participation cultivates educators' improvement science capacities. This study draws on four years of longitudinal data from the STEM PUSH Network—a NIC designed to broaden participation in STEM through collaboration with leaders of pre-college STEM programs…
Psychology (4 works) · Educational Assessment and Improvement (3 works) · Political science (3 works) · Business (2 works) · Computer Science (2 works) · Economic growth (2 works) · Economics (2 works) · Engineering (2 works) · Higher Education Research Studies (2 works) · Scholarship (2 works)