Louise Annarino
Biographic Data
| ID | 6514648 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Louise Annarino |
| GIVEN NAMES | Louise |
| FAMILY NAME | Annarino |
| SIGNATURE | ANNARINO L |
| AFFILIATIONS | Ohio University |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 23 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 0 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 23 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 1986 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 1991 |
| H-INDEX | 0 |
Department of law and ethics
California recently dealt with a version of surrogacy conflict (1). Mark and Crispina Calvert had their fertilized egg placed in Anna Johnson. She agreed to bear their child for a fee of $10,000. Ms. Johnson claims that she bonded with the developing child and that, at the very least, she ought to share parenting of the child. The Calverts claimed that because the baby was theirs genetically, it was theirs and not to be shared. In effect, they we…
Department of law and ethics
The Cruzan case has been decided by the Supreme Court. On the same day, it released two abortion decisions. Because the general topics of euthanasia and abortion are clearly related, the two decisions are discussed together
Department of law and ethics
The Supreme Court decided Webster v. Reproductive Health Services on July 3, 1989. The Missouri statute which the Supreme Court upheld, had as its preamble that the life of each human being begins at conception. It went on to stipulate that (1) unborn children be provided all the rights of other (adult) persons; (2) prior to performing an abortion, a physician must make every effort to ascertain the viability of the fetus if that physician has re…
Department of law and ethics
A lawyer representing Nancy Cruzan has filed for a hearing on the grounds that he has three witnesses who will testify that they had “specific discussions with Nancy Cruzan regarding her wishes about life-sustaining medical treatment” (1)
Department of law and ethics
Law, ethics, and allocation dovetail in the case of Larry McAfee. In 1985 he became a quadriplegic as the result of a motorcycle accident. He needs a ventilator to breathe. He recently was granted the right by both the Georgia Superior Court and the Georgia Supreme Court to turn off his ventilator using a device designed for that very purpose
Department of law and ethics
The French government commissioned a report on which it could base laws aimed at controlling the frontiers of biomedical research. The report is entitled, “The Life Sciences and the Rights of Man.” The desirability of such a law (or laws) was made evident last year when a surgeon was accused of performing experiments on a brain dead patient. The new laws would clearly make such experimentation illegal
Department of law and ethics
This issue's Department of Law and Ethics was written by Gershon B. Grunfeld of the Department of Philosophy at the University of Tennessee, Knoxville. The need for the use of anencephalic newborns as organ donors is raised in two distinct ways. First is the fact that there are many chronically ill infants and children who may benefit from organ transplant, while there is a relative scarcity of available donors. Second is the desire of some paren…
Department of law and ethics
If someone discovers during routine medical studies that I have some special factors in my blood that might prove useful (and profitable) to medical researchers, then I would certainly have the right to want to be paid for the use of my factors. No one would think this odd. I might not be particularly praiseworthy, but that is another issue
Department of law and ethics
Is There a Constitutional Right to Health Care? William Curran (1) points out that the Supreme Court has twice held that state and federal legislatures do not have legal obligations to fund abortions for the indigent. The cases were Maher v. Roe and Harris v. McRae decided respectively in 1977 and 1980 (1). In the face of these decisions, he discusses a case decided in 1987 by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. According to Curra…
Department of law and ethics
In Florida, Dr. Peter Rosier was acquitted of first degree murder in the death of his wife. She was terminally ill with cancer and had tried unsuccessfully to kill herself. Dr. Rosier gave her morphine with the intention of its killing her, but it failed. Her stepfather wound up smothering her with his hand. Aside from the bizarre and unfortunate manner of Mrs. Rosier's death, two things are noteworthy about this case: (a) the prosecution of some…
Department of law and ethics
In early December of 1987, Britain came to some conclusions concerning issues of fertilization and embryology. In passing, they scooped the New Jersey Supreme Court finding on Baby M. The British government proposed a licensing authority to oversee fertilization and embryo research. It was suggested that Parliament be given the authority to decide on whether and how much human embryo research should be allowed
Department of law and ethics
A federal district judge, Susan Getzendanner, has found twice against the AMA: First, she found that the group had “engaged in a conspiracy to contain and eliminate the chiropractic profession.” Second, she found that the AMA had been “restricting, regulating or impeding its members from associating with chiropractors.” She issued a permanent injunction against the AMA's doing this. The AMA is now required to say that it is ethical for a physicia…
Department of law and ethics
The January 7, 1988 issue of The New England Journal of Medicine has two interesting articles concerning what might generally be termed euthanasia. The article titled Initiating and Withdrawing Life Support represents a consensus among members of the Stanford University Medical Center Committee on Ethics. Its main authors have written a fine example of applied ethics (1)
Department of law and ethics
Department of law and ethics
Department of law and ethics
Department of law and ethics
The Joint Commission on Accreditation of Hospitals has found that more than 40 percent of hospitals and nursing homes have no formal guidelines for the withholding of resuscitation. As a result of this and as a result of the emphasis on patients rights, the Commission has proposed that all accredited hospitals must have a clearly stated policy on withholding resuscitation
Department of law and ethics
Department of law and ethics
Quinlan, Saikewicz, and Brother Fox are names that remind us that people in different states of competence with different sorts of histories have a right to die when the alternative is seemingly endless and useless prolongation of vegetative life. Baby Doe and the Baby Doe regulations questioned our ability to judge quality of life for “defective” infants. Perhaps there is a life not worth living for adults, but can we make the same claim for inf…
Department of law and ethics
Department of law and ethics
Department of law and ethics
With this issue we announce a change in the editorship of the Department of Law and Ethics. Because of the pressure of other professional responsibilities, Walter Probert and Ron Carson, under whose guidance this department was established, have asked to be relieved of this responsibility. We accept their request with regret, and acknowledge: with thanks the work that they have done. We are proud to present to the readers of Death Studies the new…
Department of law and ethics
Elizabeth Bouvia and the California Courts are giving continuity to “Law and Ethics”. Superior Court Judge Jack Newman appointed two physicians, D. H. Catlin and D. A. Gorelick, to evaluate the differences of opinion on Ms. Bouvia's medical management. Their report said in part that she “has not received comprehensive pain control treatment and that she had not received any help in dealing with the 'psychological and social aspects of pain contro…
No prominent works on this page.
Department of law and ethics
Quinlan, Saikewicz, and Brother Fox are names that remind us that people in different states of competence with different sorts of histories have a right to die when the alternative is seemingly endless and useless prolongation of vegetative life. Baby Doe and the Baby Doe regulations questioned our ability to judge quality of life for “defective” infants. Perhaps there is a life not worth living for adults, but can we make the same claim for inf…
Department of law and ethics
Department of law and ethics
Department of law and ethics
With this issue we announce a change in the editorship of the Department of Law and Ethics. Because of the pressure of other professional responsibilities, Walter Probert and Ron Carson, under whose guidance this department was established, have asked to be relieved of this responsibility. We accept their request with regret, and acknowledge: with thanks the work that they have done. We are proud to present to the readers of Death Studies the new…
Department of law and ethics
Elizabeth Bouvia and the California Courts are giving continuity to “Law and Ethics”. Superior Court Judge Jack Newman appointed two physicians, D. H. Catlin and D. A. Gorelick, to evaluate the differences of opinion on Ms. Bouvia's medical management. Their report said in part that she “has not received comprehensive pain control treatment and that she had not received any help in dealing with the 'psychological and social aspects of pain contro…
Department of law and ethics
Department of law and ethics
Department of law and ethics
Department of law and ethics
The Joint Commission on Accreditation of Hospitals has found that more than 40 percent of hospitals and nursing homes have no formal guidelines for the withholding of resuscitation. As a result of this and as a result of the emphasis on patients rights, the Commission has proposed that all accredited hospitals must have a clearly stated policy on withholding resuscitation
Department of law and ethics
Department of law and ethics
In early December of 1987, Britain came to some conclusions concerning issues of fertilization and embryology. In passing, they scooped the New Jersey Supreme Court finding on Baby M. The British government proposed a licensing authority to oversee fertilization and embryo research. It was suggested that Parliament be given the authority to decide on whether and how much human embryo research should be allowed
Department of law and ethics
A federal district judge, Susan Getzendanner, has found twice against the AMA: First, she found that the group had “engaged in a conspiracy to contain and eliminate the chiropractic profession.” Second, she found that the AMA had been “restricting, regulating or impeding its members from associating with chiropractors.” She issued a permanent injunction against the AMA's doing this. The AMA is now required to say that it is ethical for a physicia…
Department of law and ethics
The January 7, 1988 issue of The New England Journal of Medicine has two interesting articles concerning what might generally be termed euthanasia. The article titled Initiating and Withdrawing Life Support represents a consensus among members of the Stanford University Medical Center Committee on Ethics. Its main authors have written a fine example of applied ethics (1)
Department of law and ethics
The French government commissioned a report on which it could base laws aimed at controlling the frontiers of biomedical research. The report is entitled, “The Life Sciences and the Rights of Man.” The desirability of such a law (or laws) was made evident last year when a surgeon was accused of performing experiments on a brain dead patient. The new laws would clearly make such experimentation illegal
Department of law and ethics
This issue's Department of Law and Ethics was written by Gershon B. Grunfeld of the Department of Philosophy at the University of Tennessee, Knoxville. The need for the use of anencephalic newborns as organ donors is raised in two distinct ways. First is the fact that there are many chronically ill infants and children who may benefit from organ transplant, while there is a relative scarcity of available donors. Second is the desire of some paren…
Department of law and ethics
If someone discovers during routine medical studies that I have some special factors in my blood that might prove useful (and profitable) to medical researchers, then I would certainly have the right to want to be paid for the use of my factors. No one would think this odd. I might not be particularly praiseworthy, but that is another issue
Department of law and ethics
Is There a Constitutional Right to Health Care? William Curran (1) points out that the Supreme Court has twice held that state and federal legislatures do not have legal obligations to fund abortions for the indigent. The cases were Maher v. Roe and Harris v. McRae decided respectively in 1977 and 1980 (1). In the face of these decisions, he discusses a case decided in 1987 by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. According to Curra…
Department of law and ethics
In Florida, Dr. Peter Rosier was acquitted of first degree murder in the death of his wife. She was terminally ill with cancer and had tried unsuccessfully to kill herself. Dr. Rosier gave her morphine with the intention of its killing her, but it failed. Her stepfather wound up smothering her with his hand. Aside from the bizarre and unfortunate manner of Mrs. Rosier's death, two things are noteworthy about this case: (a) the prosecution of some…
Department of law and ethics
The Cruzan case has been decided by the Supreme Court. On the same day, it released two abortion decisions. Because the general topics of euthanasia and abortion are clearly related, the two decisions are discussed together
Department of law and ethics
The Supreme Court decided Webster v. Reproductive Health Services on July 3, 1989. The Missouri statute which the Supreme Court upheld, had as its preamble that the life of each human being begins at conception. It went on to stipulate that (1) unborn children be provided all the rights of other (adult) persons; (2) prior to performing an abortion, a physician must make every effort to ascertain the viability of the fetus if that physician has re…
Department of law and ethics
A lawyer representing Nancy Cruzan has filed for a hearing on the grounds that he has three witnesses who will testify that they had “specific discussions with Nancy Cruzan regarding her wishes about life-sustaining medical treatment” (1)
Department of law and ethics
Law, ethics, and allocation dovetail in the case of Larry McAfee. In 1985 he became a quadriplegic as the result of a motorcycle accident. He needs a ventilator to breathe. He recently was granted the right by both the Georgia Superior Court and the Georgia Supreme Court to turn off his ventilator using a device designed for that very purpose
Department of law and ethics
California recently dealt with a version of surrogacy conflict (1). Mark and Crispina Calvert had their fertilized egg placed in Anna Johnson. She agreed to bear their child for a fee of $10,000. Ms. Johnson claims that she bonded with the developing child and that, at the very least, she ought to share parenting of the child. The Calverts claimed that because the baby was theirs genetically, it was theirs and not to be shared. In effect, they we…
Law (23 works) · Law (23 works) · Political science (23 works) · Medicine (12 works) · Psychology (12 works) · Legal Education and Practice Innovations (9 works) · Sociology (8 works) · Ethics in medical practice (5 works) · Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues (5 works) · Supreme court (5 works)