Han‐Hui Por

Biographic Data

ID6540958
NAMEHan‐Hui Por
GIVEN NAMESHan‐Hui
FAMILY NAMEPor
SIGNATUREPOR H H
AFFILIATIONSFordham University
VERIFIEDNo
TOTAL WORKS6
TOTAL CITATIONS31
AUTHOR COUNT6
EDITOR COUNT0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR2009
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2024
H-INDEX1

  • A framework for comparing large-scale survey assessments

    Open AccessPeter van Rijn, Peter W van Rijn et al.ARTICLEFrontiers in Education2024

    Large-scale survey assessments (LSAs) are important tools for measuring educational outcomes and shaping policy decisions. We present a framework for comparing LSAs to facilitate studying the impact of design choice on the precision of results, contrasting India’s National Achievement Survey (NAS), the United States’ National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), and the OECD’s Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA). Our frame…

  • Eliciting Subjective Probabilities through Pair‐wise Comparisons

    Open AccessHan‐Hui Por, David V BudescuARTICLEJournal of Behavioral Decision…2016References: 7

    We propose and test a novel approach for eliciting subjective joint probabilities. In the proposed approach, judges compare pairs of possible outcomes and identify which of the two is more likely and by how much. These pair‐wise comparative judgments create a matrix of ratio judgments from which the target probabilities are extracted using the rows' (or columns') geometric means. In Study 1, subjects provided direct assessments of the likelihood …

  • Personal experience with climate change predicts intentions to act

    Open AccessStephen B Broomell, David V Budescu et al.ARTICLEGlobal Environmental Change2015Cited by: 31References: 4

  • Effective communication of uncertainty in the IPCC reports

    Open AccessDavid V Budescu, Han‐Hui Por et al.ARTICLEClimatic Change2012

  • Revisiting the Gain–Loss Separability Assumption in Prospect Theory

    Open AccessHan‐Hui Por, David V BudescuARTICLEJournal of Behavioral Decision…2012References: 7

    A fundamental assumption of prospect theory is gain–loss separability (GLS)—the assertion that the overall utility of a prospect can be expressed as a function of the utilities of its positive and negative components. Violations of GLS may potentially limit the generalization of results from studies of single‐domain prospects to mixed prospects and systematically distort the predictions of the theory. Violations also have implications for how cho…

  • Improving Communication of Uncertainty in the Reports of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change

    Open AccessDavid V Budescu, Stephen B Broomell et al.ARTICLEPsychological Science2009

    The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) assesses information relevant to the understanding of climate change and explores options for adaptation and mitigation. The IPCC reports communicate uncertainty by using a set of probability terms accompanied by global interpretational guidelines. The judgment literature indicates that there are large differences in the way people understand such phrases, and that their use may lead to confusi…