Lachezar Yanev
Biographic Data
| ID | 6547974 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Lachezar Yanev |
| GIVEN NAMES | Lachezar |
| FAMILY NAME | Yanev |
| SIGNATURE | YANEV L |
| AFFILIATIONS | Tilburg University |
| ORCID | 0000-0001-8939-6694 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 5 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 1 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 5 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2012 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2019 |
| H-INDEX | 1 |
Dutch Criminal Justice for Ethiopian War Crimes
The past few years have witnessed a proliferation of universal jurisdiction proceedings in Europe, many of which concern asylum seekers suspected of committing international crimes in Syria and the wider region. Alongside the known practical challenges of such trials, these trials also raise a range of normative questions regarding inter alia the scope of universal jurisdiction and the applicable legal standards in such proceedings. This article …
On Common Plans and Excess Crimes
The theories of joint criminal enterprise and joint control over the crime have often been cited as the paramount example of fragmentation in the jurisprudence of the International Criminal Court and the UN Tribunals. While the analyses on these two forms of co-perpetration have generally focused on contrasting the different definitional criteria that they rely on to distinguish between principals and accessories to a group crime, this article sh…
Co-Perpetration Responsibility in the Kosovo Specialist Chambers
This article examines the legal framework that the Law on Specialist Chambers (SC) and Specialist Prosecutor’s Office (the Law) establishes for the applicable forms of individual responsibility at the SC in Kosovo. For this purpose, it specifically considers how the concept of co-perpetration is defined under each of the three separate paragraphs of Article 16 of the Law: the provision that lists the modes of liability and regulates their use dep…
Divided Minds in the Lubanga Trial Judgment
The concept of co-perpetration and its proper construction continues to be a topic that causes controversy and fragmentation in the field of international criminal law. The latest proof of this is the Lubanga Trial Judgment in which the three judges disagreed on whether this mode of liability should be based on the theory of joint control over the crime. The present article examines and further develops Judge Fulford’s arguments against the adopt…
Honouring the Right to a Fair Trial within Reasonable Time
On Common Plans and Excess Crimes
The theories of joint criminal enterprise and joint control over the crime have often been cited as the paramount example of fragmentation in the jurisprudence of the International Criminal Court and the UN Tribunals. While the analyses on these two forms of co-perpetration have generally focused on contrasting the different definitional criteria that they rely on to distinguish between principals and accessories to a group crime, this article sh…
Honouring the Right to a Fair Trial within Reasonable Time
Divided Minds in the Lubanga Trial Judgment
The concept of co-perpetration and its proper construction continues to be a topic that causes controversy and fragmentation in the field of international criminal law. The latest proof of this is the Lubanga Trial Judgment in which the three judges disagreed on whether this mode of liability should be based on the theory of joint control over the crime. The present article examines and further develops Judge Fulford’s arguments against the adopt…
Co-Perpetration Responsibility in the Kosovo Specialist Chambers
This article examines the legal framework that the Law on Specialist Chambers (SC) and Specialist Prosecutor’s Office (the Law) establishes for the applicable forms of individual responsibility at the SC in Kosovo. For this purpose, it specifically considers how the concept of co-perpetration is defined under each of the three separate paragraphs of Article 16 of the Law: the provision that lists the modes of liability and regulates their use dep…
On Common Plans and Excess Crimes
The theories of joint criminal enterprise and joint control over the crime have often been cited as the paramount example of fragmentation in the jurisprudence of the International Criminal Court and the UN Tribunals. While the analyses on these two forms of co-perpetration have generally focused on contrasting the different definitional criteria that they rely on to distinguish between principals and accessories to a group crime, this article sh…
Dutch Criminal Justice for Ethiopian War Crimes
The past few years have witnessed a proliferation of universal jurisdiction proceedings in Europe, many of which concern asylum seekers suspected of committing international crimes in Syria and the wider region. Alongside the known practical challenges of such trials, these trials also raise a range of normative questions regarding inter alia the scope of universal jurisdiction and the applicable legal standards in such proceedings. This article …
International Law and Human Rights (5 works) · Law (5 works) · Political science (5 works) · Criminal law (4 works) · Global Peace and Security Dynamics (4 works) · Jurisprudence (4 works) · Sociology (4 works) · Criminology (3 works) · International law (3 works) · Law (3 works)