Fleur van Leeuwen
Biographic Data
| ID | 6548517 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Fleur van Leeuwen |
| GIVEN NAMES | Fleur |
| FAMILY NAME | van Leeuwen |
| SIGNATURE | VAN LEEUWEN F |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-1832-3604 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 5 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 0 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 5 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2003 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2024 |
| H-INDEX | 0 |
Epistemic Blind Spots, Misconceptions and Stereotypes
This article offers a critical feminist reading of the home birth jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights. The aim is to shed light on the gender sensitivity of the Court in its legal reasoning and knowledge production. Since its first decision on the permissibility of a blanket de facto home birth ban in the case of Ternovszky v. Hungary in 2010, the Court has given five judgments on the matter, including a Grand Chamber decision in …
Jaar Tijdschrift voor Vrouwen/Genderstudies
Amsterdam University Press is a leading publisher of academic books, journals and textbooks in the Humanities and Social Sciences. Our aim is to make current research available to scholars, students, innovators, and the general public. AUP stands for scholarly excellence, global presence, and engagement with the international academic community
‘De rivier die altijd stroomt’
Amsterdam University Press is a leading publisher of academic books, journals and textbooks in the Humanities and Social Sciences. Our aim is to make current research available to scholars, students, innovators, and the general public. AUP stands for scholarly excellence, global presence, and engagement with the international academic community
A Woman's Right to Decide? The United Nations Human Rights Committee, Human Rights of Women, and Matters of Human Reproduction
Although the international human rights system of the United Nations builds on the idea of equality in dignity and human rights of all human beings, critique has been heard that the system is andocentric and mainly protects these rights for men. If this is true, it indicates that the system may not address concerns related to the process of human reproduction, concerns that highly influence the enjoyment of human rights by women. The Vienna Decla…
I United Nations
No prominent works on this page.
I United Nations
A Woman's Right to Decide? The United Nations Human Rights Committee, Human Rights of Women, and Matters of Human Reproduction
Although the international human rights system of the United Nations builds on the idea of equality in dignity and human rights of all human beings, critique has been heard that the system is andocentric and mainly protects these rights for men. If this is true, it indicates that the system may not address concerns related to the process of human reproduction, concerns that highly influence the enjoyment of human rights by women. The Vienna Decla…
Jaar Tijdschrift voor Vrouwen/Genderstudies
Amsterdam University Press is a leading publisher of academic books, journals and textbooks in the Humanities and Social Sciences. Our aim is to make current research available to scholars, students, innovators, and the general public. AUP stands for scholarly excellence, global presence, and engagement with the international academic community
‘De rivier die altijd stroomt’
Amsterdam University Press is a leading publisher of academic books, journals and textbooks in the Humanities and Social Sciences. Our aim is to make current research available to scholars, students, innovators, and the general public. AUP stands for scholarly excellence, global presence, and engagement with the international academic community
Epistemic Blind Spots, Misconceptions and Stereotypes
This article offers a critical feminist reading of the home birth jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights. The aim is to shed light on the gender sensitivity of the Court in its legal reasoning and knowledge production. Since its first decision on the permissibility of a blanket de facto home birth ban in the case of Ternovszky v. Hungary in 2010, the Court has given five judgments on the matter, including a Grand Chamber decision in …
Political science (4 works) · Sociology (3 works) · Human rights (2 works) · Law (2 works) · Law (2 works) · Art (1 work) · Computer Science (1 work) · Cultural History and Identity Formation (1 work) · Declaration (1 work) · Dignity (1 work)