J H Gerards
Biographic Data
| ID | 6548536 |
|---|---|
| NAME | J H Gerards |
| GIVEN NAMES | J H |
| FAMILY NAME | Gerards |
| SIGNATURE | GERARDS J H |
| AFFILIATIONS | Utrecht University |
| ORCID | 0000-0003-3490-2232 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 7 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 7 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 7 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2013 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2021 |
| H-INDEX | 2 |
Ejil Roll of Honour; 2021 Ejil Peer Reviewer Prize; Changes in the Masthead; Germany v Italy
The fundamental rights challenges of algorithms
Algorithms form an increasingly important part of our daily lives, even if we are often unaware of it. They are enormously useful in many different ways. They facilitate the sharing economy, help detect diseases, assist government agencies in crime control, and help us choose what series or film to watch. Yet, there is also a darker side to algorithms, and that is that they (and their applications) can easily interfere with our fundamental rights…
Margin of Appreciation and Incrementalism in the Case Law of the European Court of Human Rights
Fundamental rights standards in Europe diverge as a result of differences in legal traditions, constitutional values and historical developments. The European Court of Human Rights therefore faces the challenge of having to balance the need for uniform and effective rights protection with respect for diversity. It is often thought that the famous margin of appreciation doctrine is the Court’s main tool in finding this balance. This article shows,…
Access to justice in the European Convention on Human Rights system
The numerous reforms to the Convention system of the past two decades have unquestionably had an effect on applicants’ means to access justice in the system. It is, however, open to question how these changes should be evaluated: with reference to the individual right to petition, or with reference to a more substantive and general conception of access to justice. This article explores these two approaches to the notion of access to justice both …
The ECtHR's Response to Fundamental Rights Issues Related to Financial and Economic Difficulties the Problem of Compartmentalisation
This paper presents an analysis of the case law of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) on fundamental rights limitations for which the States have advanced ‘economic’ or financial justifications. The analysis discloses important differences in the ECtHR's approach to such cases, which depend on the way they are framed and on which Convention articles they are based. It is submitted that such differences are difficult to maintain if they ar…
Inadmissibility Decisions of the European Court of Human Rights
In 2012, for the first time in many years, the case load of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR or ‘the Court’) decreased.1 The single judge formation of the Court managed to dispose of more than 81,000 applications at the admissibility stage in one year, which helped to reduce the overall number of pending cases from 151,600 in the beginning of 2012 to 128,100 cases by the end of the year.2 The Court’s judges and many others will have let …
The Discrimination Grounds of Article 14 of the European Convention on Human Rights
Journal Article The Discrimination Grounds of Article 14 of the European Convention on Human Rights Get access Janneke Gerards Janneke Gerards * * Professor of Fundamental Rights Law at the Radboud University of Nijmegen, the Netherlands ([email protected]). Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Human Rights Law Review, Volume 13, Issue 1, March 2013, Pages 99–124, https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngs044 Published…
The fundamental rights challenges of algorithms
Algorithms form an increasingly important part of our daily lives, even if we are often unaware of it. They are enormously useful in many different ways. They facilitate the sharing economy, help detect diseases, assist government agencies in crime control, and help us choose what series or film to watch. Yet, there is also a darker side to algorithms, and that is that they (and their applications) can easily interfere with our fundamental rights…
Access to justice in the European Convention on Human Rights system
The numerous reforms to the Convention system of the past two decades have unquestionably had an effect on applicants’ means to access justice in the system. It is, however, open to question how these changes should be evaluated: with reference to the individual right to petition, or with reference to a more substantive and general conception of access to justice. This article explores these two approaches to the notion of access to justice both …
The Discrimination Grounds of Article 14 of the European Convention on Human Rights
Journal Article The Discrimination Grounds of Article 14 of the European Convention on Human Rights Get access Janneke Gerards Janneke Gerards * * Professor of Fundamental Rights Law at the Radboud University of Nijmegen, the Netherlands ([email protected]). Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Human Rights Law Review, Volume 13, Issue 1, March 2013, Pages 99–124, https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngs044 Published…
The Discrimination Grounds of Article 14 of the European Convention on Human Rights
Journal Article The Discrimination Grounds of Article 14 of the European Convention on Human Rights Get access Janneke Gerards Janneke Gerards * * Professor of Fundamental Rights Law at the Radboud University of Nijmegen, the Netherlands ([email protected]). Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Human Rights Law Review, Volume 13, Issue 1, March 2013, Pages 99–124, https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngs044 Published…
Inadmissibility Decisions of the European Court of Human Rights
In 2012, for the first time in many years, the case load of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR or ‘the Court’) decreased.1 The single judge formation of the Court managed to dispose of more than 81,000 applications at the admissibility stage in one year, which helped to reduce the overall number of pending cases from 151,600 in the beginning of 2012 to 128,100 cases by the end of the year.2 The Court’s judges and many others will have let …
The ECtHR's Response to Fundamental Rights Issues Related to Financial and Economic Difficulties the Problem of Compartmentalisation
This paper presents an analysis of the case law of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) on fundamental rights limitations for which the States have advanced ‘economic’ or financial justifications. The analysis discloses important differences in the ECtHR's approach to such cases, which depend on the way they are framed and on which Convention articles they are based. It is submitted that such differences are difficult to maintain if they ar…
Access to justice in the European Convention on Human Rights system
The numerous reforms to the Convention system of the past two decades have unquestionably had an effect on applicants’ means to access justice in the system. It is, however, open to question how these changes should be evaluated: with reference to the individual right to petition, or with reference to a more substantive and general conception of access to justice. This article explores these two approaches to the notion of access to justice both …
Margin of Appreciation and Incrementalism in the Case Law of the European Court of Human Rights
Fundamental rights standards in Europe diverge as a result of differences in legal traditions, constitutional values and historical developments. The European Court of Human Rights therefore faces the challenge of having to balance the need for uniform and effective rights protection with respect for diversity. It is often thought that the famous margin of appreciation doctrine is the Court’s main tool in finding this balance. This article shows,…
The fundamental rights challenges of algorithms
Algorithms form an increasingly important part of our daily lives, even if we are often unaware of it. They are enormously useful in many different ways. They facilitate the sharing economy, help detect diseases, assist government agencies in crime control, and help us choose what series or film to watch. Yet, there is also a darker side to algorithms, and that is that they (and their applications) can easily interfere with our fundamental rights…
Ejil Roll of Honour; 2021 Ejil Peer Reviewer Prize; Changes in the Masthead; Germany v Italy
Political science (7 works) · Human rights (6 works) · Law (6 works) · European and International Law Studies (5 works) · European Criminal Justice and Data Protection (4 works) · Law (4 works) · Computer Science (3 works) · Convention (3 works) · Fundamental rights (3 works) · Law and economics (3 works)