Hallie Liberto
Biographic Data
| ID | 6558974 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Hallie Liberto |
| GIVEN NAMES | Hallie |
| FAMILY NAME | Liberto |
| SIGNATURE | LIBERTO H |
| AFFILIATIONS | University of Connecticut |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 6 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 0 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 6 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2013 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2021 |
| H-INDEX | 0 |
Coercion, Consent, and the Mechanistic Question
In this article I examine the most prevalent explanation for why coercion ever undermines consent, an explanation that I call “moral debilitation.” On this view, the manipulative strategy of coercion can disempower an agent from making the relevant change to the moral world—one necessary to grant another person a permission. I argue that coercion rarely debilitates and that there is an alternate method for explaining why coercion ever undermines …
The Problem with Sexual Promises
I first distinguish promises with positive sexual content (e.g., promises to perform sexual acts) and promises with negative sexual content (e.g., promises to refrain from sexual acts—as one does when making monogamy promises). I argue that sexual content—even positive sexual content—does not cause a promise to misfire. However, the content of some successful promises is such that a promisee ought not to accept the promise, and, if she does accep…
Species Membership and the Veil of Ignorance
Mark Rowlands gives a compelling argument that, if John Rawls's contractarianism is consistently applied, and Rawls's premises fully explained, then we have powerful reasons to believe that representatives behind the Veil of Ignorance should be blind to species membership in the same way that they are blind to economic status and natural talent. 1 I argue that even if we suppose this to be correct, these agents would not choose the two principles…
The Moral Specification of Rights
Exploitation and the Vulnerability Clause
Noxious Markets versus Noxious Gift Relationships
No prominent works on this page.
Noxious Markets versus Noxious Gift Relationships
The Moral Specification of Rights
Exploitation and the Vulnerability Clause
Species Membership and the Veil of Ignorance
Mark Rowlands gives a compelling argument that, if John Rawls's contractarianism is consistently applied, and Rawls's premises fully explained, then we have powerful reasons to believe that representatives behind the Veil of Ignorance should be blind to species membership in the same way that they are blind to economic status and natural talent. 1 I argue that even if we suppose this to be correct, these agents would not choose the two principles…
The Problem with Sexual Promises
I first distinguish promises with positive sexual content (e.g., promises to perform sexual acts) and promises with negative sexual content (e.g., promises to refrain from sexual acts—as one does when making monogamy promises). I argue that sexual content—even positive sexual content—does not cause a promise to misfire. However, the content of some successful promises is such that a promisee ought not to accept the promise, and, if she does accep…
Coercion, Consent, and the Mechanistic Question
In this article I examine the most prevalent explanation for why coercion ever undermines consent, an explanation that I call “moral debilitation.” On this view, the manipulative strategy of coercion can disempower an agent from making the relevant change to the moral world—one necessary to grant another person a permission. I argue that coercion rarely debilitates and that there is an alternate method for explaining why coercion ever undermines …
Law (4 works) · Law and economics (4 works) · Philosophy (4 works) · Political Philosophy and Ethics (4 works) · Political science (4 works) · Sociology (4 works) · Epistemology (3 works) · Psychology (3 works) · War, Ethics, and Justification (3 works) · Computer Science (2 works)