Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Sarah Holtman

Biographic Data

ID6559053
NAMESarah Holtman
GIVEN NAMESSarah
FAMILY NAMEHoltman
SIGNATUREHOLTMAN S
AFFILIATIONSTwin Cities Orthopedics
ORCID0000-0001-6545-3666
VERIFIEDYes
TOTAL WORKS8
TOTAL CITATIONS1
WORKS AS AUTHOR8
WORKS AS EDITOR0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR1997
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2018
H-INDEX1
  • Kant on Civil Society and Welfare

    Open Access•Sarah Holtman•BOOK•Kant on Civil Society and Welfare•2018

    What justifies state-sponsored supports for individual welfare within a Kantian political system, as well as the purpose and extent of such supports and the form they may take, are vexed questions. This Element characterizes and assesses main contenders (including minimalist and middle-ground accounts) by examining the competing interpretations of Kant's larger political theory that found their social welfare claims. It then develops and defends …

  • On the Question of Orphans

    Sarah Holtman•ARTICLE•Social Theory and Practice•2006

  • Kantian Justice and Poverty Relief

    Sarah Williams Holtman, Sarah Holtman•ARTICLE•Kant-Studien•2004

  • Civility and Hospitality

    Open Access•Sarah Holtman•ARTICLE•Kantian Review•2002

    ‘[S]o act externally that the free use of your choice can coexist with the freedom of everyone in accordance with a universal law’ (MM 6: 231). This is Immanuel Kant's first principle of justice, stated in the imperative form appropriate for human beings, beings who can comply with it but who might not do so. For Kant it is a principle that applies not only to relations among citizens within a state, but to those among states themselves and among…

  • A Third Concept of Liberty

    Sarah Williams Holtman, Sarah Holtman et al.•ARTICLE•The Philosophical Review•2001

  • A Third Concept of Liberty

    Sarah Williams Holtman, Sarah Holtman•ARTICLE•The Philosophical Review•2001

    Book Review| July 01 2001 A THIRD CONCEPT OF LIBERTY:JUDGMENT AND FREEDOM IN KANT AND ADAM SMITH A THIRD CONCEPT OF LIBERTY: JUDGMENT AND FREEDOM IN KANT AND ADAM SMITH. By Samuel Fleischacker. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1999. Pp. x, 300. Sarah Williams Holtman Sarah Williams Holtman Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google The Philosophical Review (2001) 110 (3): 437–440. https://doi.org/10.1215/00318108-110-3-437 V…

  • Kant, Ideal Theory, and the Justice of Exclusionary Zoning

    Sarah Williams Holtman, Sarah Holtman•ARTICLE•Ethics•1999

  • Toward Social Reform

    Open Access•Sarah Williams Holtman, Sarah Holtman•ARTICLE•Utilitas•1997•Cited by: 1•References: 7

    Here I set the stage for developing a Kantian account of punishment attuned to social and economic injustice and to the need for prison reform. I argue that we cannot appreciate Kant's own discussion of punishment unless we read it in light of the theory of justice of which it is a part and the fundamental commitments of that theory to freedom, autonomy and equality. As important, we cannot properly evaluate Kant's advocacy of the law of retribut…

  • Toward Social Reform

    Open Access•Sarah Williams Holtman, Sarah Holtman•ARTICLE•Utilitas•1997•Cited by: 1•References: 7

    Here I set the stage for developing a Kantian account of punishment attuned to social and economic injustice and to the need for prison reform. I argue that we cannot appreciate Kant's own discussion of punishment unless we read it in light of the theory of justice of which it is a part and the fundamental commitments of that theory to freedom, autonomy and equality. As important, we cannot properly evaluate Kant's advocacy of the law of retribut…

  • Toward Social Reform

    Open Access•Sarah Williams Holtman, Sarah Holtman•ARTICLE•Utilitas•1997•Cited by: 1•References: 7

    Here I set the stage for developing a Kantian account of punishment attuned to social and economic injustice and to the need for prison reform. I argue that we cannot appreciate Kant's own discussion of punishment unless we read it in light of the theory of justice of which it is a part and the fundamental commitments of that theory to freedom, autonomy and equality. As important, we cannot properly evaluate Kant's advocacy of the law of retribut…

  • Kant, Ideal Theory, and the Justice of Exclusionary Zoning

    Sarah Williams Holtman, Sarah Holtman•ARTICLE•Ethics•1999

  • A Third Concept of Liberty

    Sarah Williams Holtman, Sarah Holtman et al.•ARTICLE•The Philosophical Review•2001

  • A Third Concept of Liberty

    Sarah Williams Holtman, Sarah Holtman•ARTICLE•The Philosophical Review•2001

    Book Review| July 01 2001 A THIRD CONCEPT OF LIBERTY:JUDGMENT AND FREEDOM IN KANT AND ADAM SMITH A THIRD CONCEPT OF LIBERTY: JUDGMENT AND FREEDOM IN KANT AND ADAM SMITH. By Samuel Fleischacker. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1999. Pp. x, 300. Sarah Williams Holtman Sarah Williams Holtman Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google The Philosophical Review (2001) 110 (3): 437–440. https://doi.org/10.1215/00318108-110-3-437 V…

  • Civility and Hospitality

    Open Access•Sarah Holtman•ARTICLE•Kantian Review•2002

    ‘[S]o act externally that the free use of your choice can coexist with the freedom of everyone in accordance with a universal law’ (MM 6: 231). This is Immanuel Kant's first principle of justice, stated in the imperative form appropriate for human beings, beings who can comply with it but who might not do so. For Kant it is a principle that applies not only to relations among citizens within a state, but to those among states themselves and among…

  • Kantian Justice and Poverty Relief

    Sarah Williams Holtman, Sarah Holtman•ARTICLE•Kant-Studien•2004

  • On the Question of Orphans

    Sarah Holtman•ARTICLE•Social Theory and Practice•2006

  • Kant on Civil Society and Welfare

    Open Access•Sarah Holtman•BOOK•Kant on Civil Society and Welfare•2018

    What justifies state-sponsored supports for individual welfare within a Kantian political system, as well as the purpose and extent of such supports and the form they may take, are vexed questions. This Element characterizes and assesses main contenders (including minimalist and middle-ground accounts) by examining the competing interpretations of Kant's larger political theory that found their social welfare claims. It then develops and defends …

Political Philosophy and Ethics (7 works) · Law (6 works) · Philosophy (6 works) · Political science (6 works) · Sociology (6 works) · Epistemology (5 works) · Economic Justice (4 works) · Economics (4 works) · Law and economics (4 works) · Contemporary philosophy (3 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae