András Miklós
Biographic Data
| ID | 6559092 |
|---|---|
| NAME | András Miklós |
| GIVEN NAMES | András |
| FAMILY NAME | Miklós |
| SIGNATURE | MIKLÓS A |
| AFFILIATIONS | University of Rochester |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 6 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 2 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 6 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2006 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2024 |
| H-INDEX | 1 |
The ethics of online steering
Exploiting Injustice in Mutually Beneficial Market Exchange
Institutional consequentialism and global governance
Elsewhere we have responded to the so-called demandingness objection to consequentialism – that consequentialism is excessively demanding and is therefore unacceptable as a moral theory – by introducing the theoretical position we call institutional consequentialism. This is a consequentialist view that, however, requires institutional systems, and not individuals, to follow the consequentialist principle. In this paper, we first introduce and ex…
The Basic Structure and the Principles of Justice
This article develops an account of how economic and political institutions can limit the applicability of principles of justice even in non-relational cosmopolitan conceptions. It shows that fundamental principles of justice underdetermine fair distributive shares as well as justice-based requirements. It argues that institutions partially constitute the content of justice by determining distributive shares and by resolving indeterminacies about…
Democratic Cosmopolitanism
Institutions in cosmopolitan justice
This paper focuses on a distinction between two kinds of theories about the role of institutions in cosmopolitan justice. Some philosophers claim that principles of egalitarian justice apply to institutional schemes only, and do not apply to the actions of individuals. Others think that principles of egalitarian justice apply also to the actions of individuals. The purpose of this article is to clarify this debate with a view on cosmopolitan just…
The Basic Structure and the Principles of Justice
This article develops an account of how economic and political institutions can limit the applicability of principles of justice even in non-relational cosmopolitan conceptions. It shows that fundamental principles of justice underdetermine fair distributive shares as well as justice-based requirements. It argues that institutions partially constitute the content of justice by determining distributive shares and by resolving indeterminacies about…
Institutions in cosmopolitan justice
This paper focuses on a distinction between two kinds of theories about the role of institutions in cosmopolitan justice. Some philosophers claim that principles of egalitarian justice apply to institutional schemes only, and do not apply to the actions of individuals. Others think that principles of egalitarian justice apply also to the actions of individuals. The purpose of this article is to clarify this debate with a view on cosmopolitan just…
Democratic Cosmopolitanism
The Basic Structure and the Principles of Justice
This article develops an account of how economic and political institutions can limit the applicability of principles of justice even in non-relational cosmopolitan conceptions. It shows that fundamental principles of justice underdetermine fair distributive shares as well as justice-based requirements. It argues that institutions partially constitute the content of justice by determining distributive shares and by resolving indeterminacies about…
Institutional consequentialism and global governance
Elsewhere we have responded to the so-called demandingness objection to consequentialism – that consequentialism is excessively demanding and is therefore unacceptable as a moral theory – by introducing the theoretical position we call institutional consequentialism. This is a consequentialist view that, however, requires institutional systems, and not individuals, to follow the consequentialist principle. In this paper, we first introduce and ex…
Exploiting Injustice in Mutually Beneficial Market Exchange
The ethics of online steering
Sociology (6 works) · Law (5 works) · Political Philosophy and Ethics (5 works) · Political science (5 works) · Law (4 works) · Law and economics (4 works) · Distributive justice (3 works) · Economic Justice (3 works) · Economics (3 works) · Philosophy (3 works)