Andrea S Asker
Biographic Data
| ID | 6559093 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Andrea S Asker |
| GIVEN NAMES | Andrea S |
| FAMILY NAME | Asker |
| SIGNATURE | ASKER A S |
| AFFILIATIONS | Stockholm University |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-7038-0673 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 2 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 0 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 2 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2023 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2024 |
| H-INDEX | 0 |
Posthumous Harm and Changing Desires
The desire-satisfactionist defense of the existence of posthumous harm faces the problem of changing desires. The problem is that, in some cases where desires change before the time of their objects, the principle underlying the desire-satisfactionist defense of posthumous harm yields implausible results. In his prominent desire-satisfactionist defense of posthumous harm, David Boonin proposes a solution to this problem. First, I argue that there…
The problem of collective impact
Collective impact cases are situations where people collectively bring about a morally significant outcome by each acting in a certain way, and yet each individual action seems to make no, or almost no difference to the outcome. Intuitively, the beneficial or harmful outcomes give individuals moral reason to act (or refrain from acting) in collective impact situations. However, if the individual action does not make a difference to the outcome, i…
No prominent works on this page.
The problem of collective impact
Collective impact cases are situations where people collectively bring about a morally significant outcome by each acting in a certain way, and yet each individual action seems to make no, or almost no difference to the outcome. Intuitively, the beneficial or harmful outcomes give individuals moral reason to act (or refrain from acting) in collective impact situations. However, if the individual action does not make a difference to the outcome, i…
Posthumous Harm and Changing Desires
The desire-satisfactionist defense of the existence of posthumous harm faces the problem of changing desires. The problem is that, in some cases where desires change before the time of their objects, the principle underlying the desire-satisfactionist defense of posthumous harm yields implausible results. In his prominent desire-satisfactionist defense of posthumous harm, David Boonin proposes a solution to this problem. First, I argue that there…
Economics (2 works) · Psychology (2 works) · Social Psychology (2 works) · Action (physics) (1 work) · Collective action (1 work) · Epistemology (1 work) · Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (1 work) · Free Will and Agency (1 work) · Generalizability theory (1 work) · Harm (1 work)