Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Kate Dooley

Biographic Data

ID6570290
NAMEKate Dooley
GIVEN NAMESKate
FAMILY NAMEDooley
SIGNATUREDOOLEY K
AFFILIATIONSThe University of Melbourne
ORCID0000-0001-5636-6691
VERIFIEDYes
TOTAL WORKS16
TOTAL CITATIONS83
WORKS AS AUTHOR16
WORKS AS EDITOR0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR1985
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2024
H-INDEX5
  • Understanding land-based carbon dioxide removal in the context of the Rio Conventions

    Open Access•Kate Dooley, Setu Pelz et al.•ARTICLE•One Earth•2024

    Carbon dioxide removal (CDR) is increasingly recognized as essential for achieving the Paris Agreement's climate goals. Current CDR strategies primarily involve land-based measures, such as afforestation, reforestation, and soil carbon enhancement. These approaches, often labeled as nature-based solutions (NBS) or natural climate solutions (NCS), have sparked debate due to their potential adverse effects on biodiversity and uncertainty around the…

  • Carbon removal and the empirics of climate delay

    Open Access•Nils Markusson, Holly Jean Buck et al.•ARTICLE•Environmental Science & Policy•2024•Cited by: 5•References: 8

  • Carbon removals from nature restoration are no substitute for steep emission reductions

    Open Access•Kate Dooley, Zebedee Nicholls et al.•ARTICLE•One Earth•2022

  • Ethical choices behind quantifications of fair contributions under the Paris Agreement

    Open Access•Kate Dooley, Christian Holz et al.•ARTICLE•Nature Climate Change•2021

  • Carbon‐dioxide Removal and Biodiversity

    Open Access•Kate Dooley, Ellycia Harrould‐kolieb et al.•ARTICLE•Global Policy•2021

    Carbon‐dioxide removal (CDR) technologies offer the potential to contribute to the restoration and protection of natural ecosystems, the achievement of development goals and the safeguarding of human wellbeing. However, these technologies can also present risks to biodiversity, particularly those techniques that depend on large‐scale manipulation of ecosystems and earth‐system processes. Debates around the development of these technologies have h…

  • Inequalities through the lens of science

    Open Access•Lucy Rodina, Kate Dooley et al.•ARTICLE•One Earth•2021

  • Dynamic modelling shows substantial contribution of ecosystem restoration to climate change mitigation

    Open Access•Emma Littleton, Kate Dooley et al.•ARTICLE•Environmental Research Letters•2021

    Limiting global warming to a 1.5°C temperature rise requires drastic emissions reductions and removal of carbon-dioxide from the atmosphere. Most modelled pathways for 1.5°C assume substantial removals in the form of biomass energy with carbon capture and storage, which brings with it increasing risks to biodiversity and food security via extensive land-use change. Recently, multiple efforts to describe and quantify potential removals via ecosyst…

  • Climate policy decision making in contexts of deep uncertainty - from optimisation to robustness

    Open Access•Mark Workman, Geoff Darch et al.•ARTICLE•Environmental Science & Policy•2021•Cited by: 6•References: 10

  • Principles for Thinking about Carbon Dioxide Removal in Just Climate Policy

    Open Access•David R Morrow, Michael S Thompson et al.•ARTICLE•One Earth•2020

  • Decision making in contexts of deep uncertainty - An alternative approach for long-term climate policy

    Open Access•Mark Workman, Kate Dooley et al.•ARTICLE•Environmental Science & Policy•2019•Cited by: 16•References: 4

  • Land-based negative emissions

    Open Access•Kate Dooley, Sivan Kartha•ARTICLE•International Environmental…•2017•Cited by: 12•References: 1

  • Governing by expertise

    Open Access•Kate Dooley, Aarti Gupta•ARTICLE•International Environmental…•2016•Cited by: 10•References: 6

    This article analyzes the contested politics of including (and accounting for) land-based mitigation in a post-2020 climate agreement. Emissions from land have been only partially included to date within the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change and its Kyoto Protocol. The Paris Agreement, adopted in December 2015 and “applicable to all” for the post-2020 period, raises the possibility of unprecedented reliance on land-based mitig…

  • Principles of justice in proposals and policy approaches to avoided deforestation

    Open Access•Chioma Okereke, Kate Dooley•ARTICLE•Global Environmental Change•2009•Cited by: 34•References: 10

  • Celebrations of the Word

    Kate Dooley•ARTICLE•Liturgy•1991

  • The Sign of the Cross

    Kate Dooley•ARTICLE•Liturgy•1987

  • Catechesis for a Community of Faith

    Kate Dooley•ARTICLE•Liturgy•1985

  • Principles of justice in proposals and policy approaches to avoided deforestation

    Open Access•Chioma Okereke, Kate Dooley•ARTICLE•Global Environmental Change•2009•Cited by: 34•References: 10

  • Decision making in contexts of deep uncertainty - An alternative approach for long-term climate policy

    Open Access•Mark Workman, Kate Dooley et al.•ARTICLE•Environmental Science & Policy•2019•Cited by: 16•References: 4

  • Land-based negative emissions

    Open Access•Kate Dooley, Sivan Kartha•ARTICLE•International Environmental…•2017•Cited by: 12•References: 1

  • Governing by expertise

    Open Access•Kate Dooley, Aarti Gupta•ARTICLE•International Environmental…•2016•Cited by: 10•References: 6

    This article analyzes the contested politics of including (and accounting for) land-based mitigation in a post-2020 climate agreement. Emissions from land have been only partially included to date within the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change and its Kyoto Protocol. The Paris Agreement, adopted in December 2015 and “applicable to all” for the post-2020 period, raises the possibility of unprecedented reliance on land-based mitig…

  • Climate policy decision making in contexts of deep uncertainty - from optimisation to robustness

    Open Access•Mark Workman, Geoff Darch et al.•ARTICLE•Environmental Science & Policy•2021•Cited by: 6•References: 10

  • Carbon removal and the empirics of climate delay

    Open Access•Nils Markusson, Holly Jean Buck et al.•ARTICLE•Environmental Science & Policy•2024•Cited by: 5•References: 8

  • Catechesis for a Community of Faith

    Kate Dooley•ARTICLE•Liturgy•1985

  • The Sign of the Cross

    Kate Dooley•ARTICLE•Liturgy•1987

  • Celebrations of the Word

    Kate Dooley•ARTICLE•Liturgy•1991

  • Principles of justice in proposals and policy approaches to avoided deforestation

    Open Access•Chioma Okereke, Kate Dooley•ARTICLE•Global Environmental Change•2009•Cited by: 34•References: 10

  • Governing by expertise

    Open Access•Kate Dooley, Aarti Gupta•ARTICLE•International Environmental…•2016•Cited by: 10•References: 6

    This article analyzes the contested politics of including (and accounting for) land-based mitigation in a post-2020 climate agreement. Emissions from land have been only partially included to date within the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change and its Kyoto Protocol. The Paris Agreement, adopted in December 2015 and “applicable to all” for the post-2020 period, raises the possibility of unprecedented reliance on land-based mitig…

  • Land-based negative emissions

    Open Access•Kate Dooley, Sivan Kartha•ARTICLE•International Environmental…•2017•Cited by: 12•References: 1

  • Decision making in contexts of deep uncertainty - An alternative approach for long-term climate policy

    Open Access•Mark Workman, Kate Dooley et al.•ARTICLE•Environmental Science & Policy•2019•Cited by: 16•References: 4

  • Principles for Thinking about Carbon Dioxide Removal in Just Climate Policy

    Open Access•David R Morrow, Michael S Thompson et al.•ARTICLE•One Earth•2020

  • Ethical choices behind quantifications of fair contributions under the Paris Agreement

    Open Access•Kate Dooley, Christian Holz et al.•ARTICLE•Nature Climate Change•2021

  • Carbon‐dioxide Removal and Biodiversity

    Open Access•Kate Dooley, Ellycia Harrould‐kolieb et al.•ARTICLE•Global Policy•2021

    Carbon‐dioxide removal (CDR) technologies offer the potential to contribute to the restoration and protection of natural ecosystems, the achievement of development goals and the safeguarding of human wellbeing. However, these technologies can also present risks to biodiversity, particularly those techniques that depend on large‐scale manipulation of ecosystems and earth‐system processes. Debates around the development of these technologies have h…

  • Inequalities through the lens of science

    Open Access•Lucy Rodina, Kate Dooley et al.•ARTICLE•One Earth•2021

  • Dynamic modelling shows substantial contribution of ecosystem restoration to climate change mitigation

    Open Access•Emma Littleton, Kate Dooley et al.•ARTICLE•Environmental Research Letters•2021

    Limiting global warming to a 1.5°C temperature rise requires drastic emissions reductions and removal of carbon-dioxide from the atmosphere. Most modelled pathways for 1.5°C assume substantial removals in the form of biomass energy with carbon capture and storage, which brings with it increasing risks to biodiversity and food security via extensive land-use change. Recently, multiple efforts to describe and quantify potential removals via ecosyst…

  • Climate policy decision making in contexts of deep uncertainty - from optimisation to robustness

    Open Access•Mark Workman, Geoff Darch et al.•ARTICLE•Environmental Science & Policy•2021•Cited by: 6•References: 10

  • Carbon removals from nature restoration are no substitute for steep emission reductions

    Open Access•Kate Dooley, Zebedee Nicholls et al.•ARTICLE•One Earth•2022

  • Understanding land-based carbon dioxide removal in the context of the Rio Conventions

    Open Access•Kate Dooley, Setu Pelz et al.•ARTICLE•One Earth•2024

    Carbon dioxide removal (CDR) is increasingly recognized as essential for achieving the Paris Agreement's climate goals. Current CDR strategies primarily involve land-based measures, such as afforestation, reforestation, and soil carbon enhancement. These approaches, often labeled as nature-based solutions (NBS) or natural climate solutions (NCS), have sparked debate due to their potential adverse effects on biodiversity and uncertainty around the…

  • Carbon removal and the empirics of climate delay

    Open Access•Nils Markusson, Holly Jean Buck et al.•ARTICLE•Environmental Science & Policy•2024•Cited by: 5•References: 8

Climate change (10 works) · Climate Change Policy and Economics (10 works) · Computer Science (9 works) · Economics (9 works) · Ecology (8 works) · Environmental Science (8 works) · Business (6 works) · Environmental resource management (6 works) · Sustainability and Climate Change Governance (6 works) · Climate Change and Geoengineering (5 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae