Rose Keller
Biographic Data
| ID | 6582390 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Rose Keller |
| GIVEN NAMES | Rose |
| FAMILY NAME | Keller |
| SIGNATURE | KELLER R |
| AFFILIATIONS | Norwegian Institute for Nature Research |
| ORCID | 0000-0003-0491-7513 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 9 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 11 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 9 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2013 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2026 |
| H-INDEX | 3 |
Enduring cultural legacies affect Euro-American wildlife values
Weaving values, knowledge and context to care for human–nature relationships in protected areas
Transformative change necessitates a profound shift in how people relate to, understand, value and envision landscapes to find effective pathways for conservation science and practice. In response, we examined the relationships among broad values—biospheric, altruistic and egoistic—that work in conjunction with ecological knowledge acquisition and social–ecological contextual factors to explain specific values assigned to landscapes, visions for …
‘Bonkers but good!’ – Using illustration-based interview methods to understand land management and conservation visions
Visions help to understand common ground and tensions among citizens and stakeholders, supporting inclusive land management and conservation solutions to the climate emergency and biodiversity crisis. With careful design and sufficient resource, it is possible to bring together communities and other stakeholders to share perspectives and deliberate desired futures, identifying more acceptable alternatives and avoiding costly delays. We evaluated …
Integrating social values with GPS tracks through Denali National Park and Preserve
Inclusive conservation and the Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework
The draft Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework commits to achievement of equity and justice outcomes and represents a ‘‘relational turn’’ in how we understand inclusive conservation. Although ‘‘inclusivity’’ is drawn on as a means to engage diverse stakeholders, widening the framing of inclusivity can create new tensions with regard to how to manage protected areas. We first offer a set of tensions that emerge in the light of the relational tu…
Understanding the role of local knowledge in the spatial dynamics of social values expressed by stakeholders
Delineating participation in conservation governance
The active participation of local stakeholders in governing protected areas is increasingly recognized in biodiversity conservation. While progress has been made in countries to facilitate inclusivity in conservation decision-making, there is limited practical guidance of participatory mechanisms enabling stakeholder engagement. Disentangling formal and informal governance arrangements within protected areas illuminates how stakeholder participat…
Integrating multi-level values and pro-environmental behavior in a U.S. protected area
Landscape pattern and car use
Integrating multi-level values and pro-environmental behavior in a U.S. protected area
Delineating participation in conservation governance
The active participation of local stakeholders in governing protected areas is increasingly recognized in biodiversity conservation. While progress has been made in countries to facilitate inclusivity in conservation decision-making, there is limited practical guidance of participatory mechanisms enabling stakeholder engagement. Disentangling formal and informal governance arrangements within protected areas illuminates how stakeholder participat…
Landscape pattern and car use
Landscape pattern and car use
Integrating multi-level values and pro-environmental behavior in a U.S. protected area
Understanding the role of local knowledge in the spatial dynamics of social values expressed by stakeholders
Delineating participation in conservation governance
The active participation of local stakeholders in governing protected areas is increasingly recognized in biodiversity conservation. While progress has been made in countries to facilitate inclusivity in conservation decision-making, there is limited practical guidance of participatory mechanisms enabling stakeholder engagement. Disentangling formal and informal governance arrangements within protected areas illuminates how stakeholder participat…
Inclusive conservation and the Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework
The draft Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework commits to achievement of equity and justice outcomes and represents a ‘‘relational turn’’ in how we understand inclusive conservation. Although ‘‘inclusivity’’ is drawn on as a means to engage diverse stakeholders, widening the framing of inclusivity can create new tensions with regard to how to manage protected areas. We first offer a set of tensions that emerge in the light of the relational tu…
‘Bonkers but good!’ – Using illustration-based interview methods to understand land management and conservation visions
Visions help to understand common ground and tensions among citizens and stakeholders, supporting inclusive land management and conservation solutions to the climate emergency and biodiversity crisis. With careful design and sufficient resource, it is possible to bring together communities and other stakeholders to share perspectives and deliberate desired futures, identifying more acceptable alternatives and avoiding costly delays. We evaluated …
Integrating social values with GPS tracks through Denali National Park and Preserve
Weaving values, knowledge and context to care for human–nature relationships in protected areas
Transformative change necessitates a profound shift in how people relate to, understand, value and envision landscapes to find effective pathways for conservation science and practice. In response, we examined the relationships among broad values—biospheric, altruistic and egoistic—that work in conjunction with ecological knowledge acquisition and social–ecological contextual factors to explain specific values assigned to landscapes, visions for …
Enduring cultural legacies affect Euro-American wildlife values
Environmental resource management (7 works) · Geography (7 works) · Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (5 works) · Ecology (5 works) · Environmental Science (5 works) · Economic and Environmental Valuation (4 works) · Land Use and Ecosystem Services (4 works) · Sociology (4 works) · Computer Science (3 works) · Environmental planning (3 works)