Rebecca McEwen
Biographic Data
| ID | 6603005 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Rebecca McEwen |
| GIVEN NAMES | Rebecca |
| FAMILY NAME | McEwen |
| SIGNATURE | MCEWEN R |
| AFFILIATIONS | University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 3 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 1 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 3 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2014 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2018 |
| H-INDEX | 1 |
Differential or deferential to media? The effect of prejudicial publicity on judge or jury
Australian jurisdictions have increasingly moved to facilitate trial by judge alone in cases which are the subject of significant prejudicial publicity. These moves have been predicated upon the assumption that the ordering of a trial by judge alone is an effective means of reducing the risk of prejudice in cases of this kind. This article has two objects. First, it investigates the principles underpinning the availability of trial by judge alone…
Judges, Juries and Prejudicial Publicity
The criminal justice system has long held the view that judges are more capable than jurors of disregarding inadmissible prejudicial material. One consequence of this is the differential treatment of judges and jurors in respect of actual or potential exposure, via conventional or social media, to publicity which is prejudicial to a defendant. This article examines psycho-legal research findings which undermine the assumption upon which this diff…
A Call to Arms
Judges, Juries and Prejudicial Publicity
The criminal justice system has long held the view that judges are more capable than jurors of disregarding inadmissible prejudicial material. One consequence of this is the differential treatment of judges and jurors in respect of actual or potential exposure, via conventional or social media, to publicity which is prejudicial to a defendant. This article examines psycho-legal research findings which undermine the assumption upon which this diff…
A Call to Arms
Judges, Juries and Prejudicial Publicity
The criminal justice system has long held the view that judges are more capable than jurors of disregarding inadmissible prejudicial material. One consequence of this is the differential treatment of judges and jurors in respect of actual or potential exposure, via conventional or social media, to publicity which is prejudicial to a defendant. This article examines psycho-legal research findings which undermine the assumption upon which this diff…
Differential or deferential to media? The effect of prejudicial publicity on judge or jury
Australian jurisdictions have increasingly moved to facilitate trial by judge alone in cases which are the subject of significant prejudicial publicity. These moves have been predicated upon the assumption that the ordering of a trial by judge alone is an effective means of reducing the risk of prejudice in cases of this kind. This article has two objects. First, it investigates the principles underpinning the availability of trial by judge alone…
Political science (3 works) · Computer Science (2 works) · Jury Decision Making Processes (2 works) · Law (2 works) · Law (2 works) · Law in Society and Culture (2 works) · Psychology (2 works) · Publicity (2 works) · Criminology (1 work) · Judicial and Constitutional Studies (1 work)