Brittany A Cardwell
Biographic Data
| ID | 6617325 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Brittany A Cardwell |
| GIVEN NAMES | Brittany A |
| FAMILY NAME | Cardwell |
| SIGNATURE | CARDWELL B A |
| AFFILIATIONS | University of Otago |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 2 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 0 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 2 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2019 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2019 |
| H-INDEX | 0 |
Evidence That “Voluntary” Versus “Involuntary” Retrieval Is a Fluency-Based Attribution
Our memories can come to mind either voluntarily—after we intended to retrieve them—or, involuntarily—without our intent. Studies often rely upon subjects themselves to classify their memories as voluntary or involuntary. But how well do subjects perform this task? There is reason to suspect that subjects sometimes base these classifications of intent on feelings of fluency—that is, ease of retrieval—leading them to misclassify their memories. In…
Religious Believers Do Not Distinguish Good from Poor Reasons for God’s Existence
Can people discriminate good from bad reasons for their beliefs about God? Research shows that religious believers favor intuitive processing, suggesting they may be less discriminating than nonbelievers. Indeed, in Experiment 1 and a replication, people listed 15 reasons for their beliefs about God, then evaluated the quality of either their first 3 reasons (presumably their best) or their last 3 (their worst); in both experiments, nonbelievers …
No prominent works on this page.
Evidence That “Voluntary” Versus “Involuntary” Retrieval Is a Fluency-Based Attribution
Our memories can come to mind either voluntarily—after we intended to retrieve them—or, involuntarily—without our intent. Studies often rely upon subjects themselves to classify their memories as voluntary or involuntary. But how well do subjects perform this task? There is reason to suspect that subjects sometimes base these classifications of intent on feelings of fluency—that is, ease of retrieval—leading them to misclassify their memories. In…
Religious Believers Do Not Distinguish Good from Poor Reasons for God’s Existence
Can people discriminate good from bad reasons for their beliefs about God? Research shows that religious believers favor intuitive processing, suggesting they may be less discriminating than nonbelievers. Indeed, in Experiment 1 and a replication, people listed 15 reasons for their beliefs about God, then evaluated the quality of either their first 3 reasons (presumably their best) or their last 3 (their worst); in both experiments, nonbelievers …
Psychology (2 works) · Social Psychology (2 works) · Social Psychology (2 works) · Argument (complex analysis (1 work) · Attribution (1 work) · Cognitive psychology (1 work) · Epistemology (1 work) · Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (1 work) · Feeling (1 work) · Fluency (1 work)