Haneol Lee
Biographic Data
| ID | 6629392 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Haneol Lee |
| GIVEN NAMES | Haneol |
| FAMILY NAME | Lee |
| SIGNATURE | LEE H |
| AFFILIATIONS | Sogang University |
| ORCID | 0000-0001-5531-5876 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 3 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 0 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 3 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2021 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2025 |
| H-INDEX | 0 |
Toward a Perfection of Nuclear Strategy
Has the Operational Control Transfer of the ROK ‐ US Alliance Come to the Cul‐de‐sac? International and Domestic Factors That Explain Delays in an Alliance Policy
Strategic effects of military alliances notwithstanding, to assume that their policy will proceed without difficulties is problematic. The ROK‐US alliance began transferring the wartime operational control (OPCON) to the ROK in early 2003. However, the transfer did not proceed as planned, experiencing two delays in June 2010 and October 2014 with a significant format change to the Condition‐based OPCON Transition Plan (COT‐P), meaning the additio…
Smaller Ally Matters
This article explores alliance effectiveness with a particular focus on peacetime capability‐building activities. Questioning why an alliance succeeds in an effective capability‐building activity sometimes but not others, this article argues that the key to effectiveness rests on the civil‐military relations of the smaller ally. The military effectiveness of capability‐building activities increases if the preferences of civilian and military lead…
No prominent works on this page.
Smaller Ally Matters
This article explores alliance effectiveness with a particular focus on peacetime capability‐building activities. Questioning why an alliance succeeds in an effective capability‐building activity sometimes but not others, this article argues that the key to effectiveness rests on the civil‐military relations of the smaller ally. The military effectiveness of capability‐building activities increases if the preferences of civilian and military lead…
Has the Operational Control Transfer of the ROK ‐ US Alliance Come to the Cul‐de‐sac? International and Domestic Factors That Explain Delays in an Alliance Policy
Strategic effects of military alliances notwithstanding, to assume that their policy will proceed without difficulties is problematic. The ROK‐US alliance began transferring the wartime operational control (OPCON) to the ROK in early 2003. However, the transfer did not proceed as planned, experiencing two delays in June 2010 and October 2014 with a significant format change to the Condition‐based OPCON Transition Plan (COT‐P), meaning the additio…
Toward a Perfection of Nuclear Strategy
Economics (3 works) · Law (3 works) · Law (3 works) · Political science (3 works) · Alliance (2 works) · Business (2 works) · International Relations and Foreign Policy (2 works) · International trade (2 works) · Management (2 works) · Politics (2 works)