Antoinette Kavanaugh
Biographic Data
| ID | 6633576 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Antoinette Kavanaugh |
| GIVEN NAMES | Antoinette |
| FAMILY NAME | Kavanaugh |
| SIGNATURE | KAVANAUGH A |
| AFFILIATIONS | IS practice |
| ORCID | 0000-0003-2354-8936 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 2 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 2 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 2 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2016 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2023 |
| H-INDEX | 1 |
Taking the next step in Miranda evaluations
By law, before interrrogating a suspect who is in custody, the police should inform them of their Miranda rights-the rights against self-incrimination and to an attorney. When a suspect or defendant waives their Miranda rights, a judge ultimately determines whether the waiver was legal. In making this determination, the judge employs the totality of the circumstances (TOC) analysis, which includes factors related to the individual defendant as we…
Prospects for developmental evidence in juvenile sentencing based on Miller v. Alabama
Recent U.S. Supreme Court decisions barred mandatory life without parole for juvenile homicide (Miller v. Alabama, 2012) and applied Miller retroactively (Montgomery v. Louisiana, 2016). Miller identified several developmental factors to consider in mitigation, but left many questions unanswered abo
Prospects for developmental evidence in juvenile sentencing based on Miller v. Alabama
Recent U.S. Supreme Court decisions barred mandatory life without parole for juvenile homicide (Miller v. Alabama, 2012) and applied Miller retroactively (Montgomery v. Louisiana, 2016). Miller identified several developmental factors to consider in mitigation, but left many questions unanswered abo
Prospects for developmental evidence in juvenile sentencing based on Miller v. Alabama
Recent U.S. Supreme Court decisions barred mandatory life without parole for juvenile homicide (Miller v. Alabama, 2012) and applied Miller retroactively (Montgomery v. Louisiana, 2016). Miller identified several developmental factors to consider in mitigation, but left many questions unanswered abo
Taking the next step in Miranda evaluations
By law, before interrrogating a suspect who is in custody, the police should inform them of their Miranda rights-the rights against self-incrimination and to an attorney. When a suspect or defendant waives their Miranda rights, a judge ultimately determines whether the waiver was legal. In making this determination, the judge employs the totality of the circumstances (TOC) analysis, which includes factors related to the individual defendant as we…
Criminology (2 works) · Political science (2 works) · Psychology (2 works) · Biology (1 work) · Child Abuse and Trauma (1 work) · Context (archaeology) (1 work) · Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (1 work) · Deception detection and forensic psychology (1 work) · Ecology (1 work) · Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare (1 work)