Rinat Meerson
Biographic Data
| ID | 6640674 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Rinat Meerson |
| GIVEN NAMES | Rinat |
| FAMILY NAME | Meerson |
| SIGNATURE | MEERSON R |
| AFFILIATIONS | University of Vienna |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-9294-4599 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 4 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 3 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 4 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2025 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2026 |
| H-INDEX | 1 |
The State of Evidence in Digital Hate Research
Digital hate poses a threat to citizens, communities, and societies. Despite numerous studies and reviews on the concept of digital hate, we lack a systematic view of the entire body of scholarship. The aim of this umbrella review is therefore to evaluate the scope, definitions, main findings, and identified gaps of digital hate research. An umbrella review allows one to examine, compare, and evaluate the state of the research across all availabl…
Discursive consequences of social media hostility
There is mounting evidence that social media platforms facilitate the dissemination of hostility, potentially yielding detrimental effects on the discursive space. Exposure to such hostilities can be particularly problematic for emerging adults, given this age group's high sensitivity to social validation. Our study investigated how exposure to social media hostility can shape emerging adults' willingness to engage in or avoid social media discus…
Platform-led content moderation through the bystander lens
With growing pervasiveness of social media, content moderation has become a subject of interest for stakeholders. Bystanders, defined as ‘neutral’ users who witness inappropriate content without being directly involved, play a crucial role in determining the acceptance and long-term sustainability of platform-led moderation. Despite their importance, our understanding of bystanders’ multifaceted experience when witnessing moderation requires a co…
Too much of what? Two-wave panel evidence for selective (de-)sensitization through frequent exposure to different kinds of digital hate
Digital hate has become an inevitable aspect of daily life for social media users, constituting a formidable societal challenge. Despite broad consensus of related harms, researchers have struggled to predict users’ intervening activity and moderation preferences, especially given that they are subject to temporal changes. A two-wave panel survey was conducted to investigate how exposure frequency to incivility, intolerance, and threats is associ…
Too much of what? Two-wave panel evidence for selective (de-)sensitization through frequent exposure to different kinds of digital hate
Digital hate has become an inevitable aspect of daily life for social media users, constituting a formidable societal challenge. Despite broad consensus of related harms, researchers have struggled to predict users’ intervening activity and moderation preferences, especially given that they are subject to temporal changes. A two-wave panel survey was conducted to investigate how exposure frequency to incivility, intolerance, and threats is associ…
Discursive consequences of social media hostility
There is mounting evidence that social media platforms facilitate the dissemination of hostility, potentially yielding detrimental effects on the discursive space. Exposure to such hostilities can be particularly problematic for emerging adults, given this age group's high sensitivity to social validation. Our study investigated how exposure to social media hostility can shape emerging adults' willingness to engage in or avoid social media discus…
Platform-led content moderation through the bystander lens
With growing pervasiveness of social media, content moderation has become a subject of interest for stakeholders. Bystanders, defined as ‘neutral’ users who witness inappropriate content without being directly involved, play a crucial role in determining the acceptance and long-term sustainability of platform-led moderation. Despite their importance, our understanding of bystanders’ multifaceted experience when witnessing moderation requires a co…
Too much of what? Two-wave panel evidence for selective (de-)sensitization through frequent exposure to different kinds of digital hate
Digital hate has become an inevitable aspect of daily life for social media users, constituting a formidable societal challenge. Despite broad consensus of related harms, researchers have struggled to predict users’ intervening activity and moderation preferences, especially given that they are subject to temporal changes. A two-wave panel survey was conducted to investigate how exposure frequency to incivility, intolerance, and threats is associ…
The State of Evidence in Digital Hate Research
Digital hate poses a threat to citizens, communities, and societies. Despite numerous studies and reviews on the concept of digital hate, we lack a systematic view of the entire body of scholarship. The aim of this umbrella review is therefore to evaluate the scope, definitions, main findings, and identified gaps of digital hate research. An umbrella review allows one to examine, compare, and evaluate the state of the research across all availabl…
Psychology (4 works) · Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection (3 works) · Social Media and Politics (3 works) · Social Psychology (3 works) · Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression (2 works) · Political science (2 works) · Sociology (2 works) · Bystander effect (1 work) · Child Development and Digital Technology (1 work) · Computer Science (1 work)