Charles Warfield
Biographic Data
| ID | 6650560 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Charles Warfield |
| GIVEN NAMES | Charles |
| FAMILY NAME | Warfield |
| SIGNATURE | WARFIELD C |
| AFFILIATIONS | Western Michigan University |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 3 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 2 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 3 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2004 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2008 |
| H-INDEX | 1 |
The Fidelity—Adaptation Relationship in Non-Evidence-Based Programs and its Implication for Program Evaluation
Based on our experience in helping design, implement, and evaluate a non-evidence-based program, we explore a non-conventional fidelity and adaptation relationship and its implications for program evaluation.We find that in non-evidence-based interventions, program fidelity and adaptation may not be competitors but serve to complement each other.This non-conventional relationship leads to expanded roles of evaluation in program design and impleme…
Multilevel Evaluation Alignment
Multilevel Evaluation Alignment
Using the evaluation work on the W.K. Kellogg Foundation’s Unleashing Resources Initiative as an example, in this article we explicate a general four-step model appropriate for multilevel evaluation alignment. We review the relevant literature, argue for the need for evaluation alignment in a multilevel context, explain the four-step model, discuss the benefits of the model, and address the issues that one should pay attention to when implementin…
Multilevel Evaluation Alignment
Multilevel Evaluation Alignment
Using the evaluation work on the W.K. Kellogg Foundation’s Unleashing Resources Initiative as an example, in this article we explicate a general four-step model appropriate for multilevel evaluation alignment. We review the relevant literature, argue for the need for evaluation alignment in a multilevel context, explain the four-step model, discuss the benefits of the model, and address the issues that one should pay attention to when implementin…
Multilevel Evaluation Alignment
Multilevel Evaluation Alignment
Using the evaluation work on the W.K. Kellogg Foundation’s Unleashing Resources Initiative as an example, in this article we explicate a general four-step model appropriate for multilevel evaluation alignment. We review the relevant literature, argue for the need for evaluation alignment in a multilevel context, explain the four-step model, discuss the benefits of the model, and address the issues that one should pay attention to when implementin…
The Fidelity—Adaptation Relationship in Non-Evidence-Based Programs and its Implication for Program Evaluation
Based on our experience in helping design, implement, and evaluate a non-evidence-based program, we explore a non-conventional fidelity and adaptation relationship and its implications for program evaluation.We find that in non-evidence-based interventions, program fidelity and adaptation may not be competitors but serve to complement each other.This non-conventional relationship leads to expanded roles of evaluation in program design and impleme…
Computer Science (3 works) · Engineering (3 works) · Evaluation and Performance Assessment (3 works) · Context (archaeology (2 works) · Epistemology (2 works) · Explication (2 works) · Foundation (evidence (2 works) · Machine learning (2 works) · Management science (2 works) · Multilevel model (2 works)