Teresa Diaz Gonçalves
Biographic Data
| ID | 6668898 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Teresa Diaz Gonçalves |
| GIVEN NAMES | Teresa Diaz |
| FAMILY NAME | Gonçalves |
| SIGNATURE | GONÇALVES T D |
| AFFILIATIONS | National Laboratory for Civil Engineering |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-9321-3667 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 3 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 2 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 3 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2006 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2023 |
| H-INDEX | 1 |
On the Inconsistency between Practice and Reporting in Science: The Genesis of Scientific Articles
Scientific publications depict science as an orderly endeavour and the epitome of rationality. In contrast, scientific practice is messy and not strictly rational. Here, I analyse this inconsistency, which is recurrent, and try to clarify its meaning for the functioning of science. The discussion is based on a review of relevant literature and detailed analysis of the role of each of the three intervening elements, the scientist, his/her practice…
Evaluating the salt content of salt-contaminated samples on the basis of their hygroscopic behavior. Part I: Fundamentals, scope and accuracy of the method
Evaluating the salt content of salt-contaminated samples on the basis of their hygroscopic behaviour: Part II: experiments with nine common soluble salts
Evaluating the salt content of salt-contaminated samples on the basis of their hygroscopic behavior. Part I: Fundamentals, scope and accuracy of the method
Evaluating the salt content of salt-contaminated samples on the basis of their hygroscopic behaviour: Part II: experiments with nine common soluble salts
Evaluating the salt content of salt-contaminated samples on the basis of their hygroscopic behavior. Part I: Fundamentals, scope and accuracy of the method
Evaluating the salt content of salt-contaminated samples on the basis of their hygroscopic behaviour: Part II: experiments with nine common soluble salts
On the Inconsistency between Practice and Reporting in Science: The Genesis of Scientific Articles
Scientific publications depict science as an orderly endeavour and the epitome of rationality. In contrast, scientific practice is messy and not strictly rational. Here, I analyse this inconsistency, which is recurrent, and try to clarify its meaning for the functioning of science. The discussion is based on a review of relevant literature and detailed analysis of the role of each of the three intervening elements, the scientist, his/her practice…
Chemistry (2 works) · Computer Science (2 works) · Contamination (2 works) · Engineering (2 works) · Geotechnical engineering (2 works) · Water content (2 works) · Basis (linear algebra (1 works) · Biological system (1 works) · Brick (1 works) · Building materials and conservation (1 works)