Jaap C Hanekamp
Biographic Data
| ID | 6695328 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Jaap C Hanekamp |
| GIVEN NAMES | Jaap C |
| FAMILY NAME | Hanekamp |
| SIGNATURE | HANEKAMP J C |
| AFFILIATIONS | Russian State Agrarian Correspondence University |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-6575-3658 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 3 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 10 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 3 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2005 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2006 |
| H-INDEX | 2 |
Precaution, Science and Jurisprudence
This article discusses scientific, regulatory and social problems presented when there is a lack of scientific knowledge with regard to a risk. This question arises following the European Union's recent decision to ban virginiamycin, and the ruling on that decision by the European Court of First Instance in the Pfizer Animal Health case. The authors suggest that while policy‐makers ostensibly pay due deference to scientific opinion, their final a…
The sustainability debate
Since the publication of Our Common Future in 1987, scientists have struggled with the concept of sustainability and many definitions are now in existence. However, one can differentiate between a much smaller series of themes. Working from these definitions, we focus on six such themes. We will furthermore show that these themes are the battleground for two opposing worldviews within Western society which rule each other out. The first, the idea…
The historical roots of precautionary thinking
Although, at first glance, the precautionary principle looks perfectly sensible and self‐evident, it is based on a way of thinking that has a history of its own, which goes back to the 1960s and early 1970s. Precautionary thinking should mainly be seen as a reaction: it is an answer to the self‐confidence mainstream society had in the ‘progress’ of post‐war civilization. It is an antithesis, which materialized when especially Western civilization…
Precaution, Science and Jurisprudence
This article discusses scientific, regulatory and social problems presented when there is a lack of scientific knowledge with regard to a risk. This question arises following the European Union's recent decision to ban virginiamycin, and the ruling on that decision by the European Court of First Instance in the Pfizer Animal Health case. The authors suggest that while policy‐makers ostensibly pay due deference to scientific opinion, their final a…
The historical roots of precautionary thinking
Although, at first glance, the precautionary principle looks perfectly sensible and self‐evident, it is based on a way of thinking that has a history of its own, which goes back to the 1960s and early 1970s. Precautionary thinking should mainly be seen as a reaction: it is an answer to the self‐confidence mainstream society had in the ‘progress’ of post‐war civilization. It is an antithesis, which materialized when especially Western civilization…
The sustainability debate
Since the publication of Our Common Future in 1987, scientists have struggled with the concept of sustainability and many definitions are now in existence. However, one can differentiate between a much smaller series of themes. Working from these definitions, we focus on six such themes. We will furthermore show that these themes are the battleground for two opposing worldviews within Western society which rule each other out. The first, the idea…
The sustainability debate
Since the publication of Our Common Future in 1987, scientists have struggled with the concept of sustainability and many definitions are now in existence. However, one can differentiate between a much smaller series of themes. Working from these definitions, we focus on six such themes. We will furthermore show that these themes are the battleground for two opposing worldviews within Western society which rule each other out. The first, the idea…
The historical roots of precautionary thinking
Although, at first glance, the precautionary principle looks perfectly sensible and self‐evident, it is based on a way of thinking that has a history of its own, which goes back to the 1960s and early 1970s. Precautionary thinking should mainly be seen as a reaction: it is an answer to the self‐confidence mainstream society had in the ‘progress’ of post‐war civilization. It is an antithesis, which materialized when especially Western civilization…
Precaution, Science and Jurisprudence
This article discusses scientific, regulatory and social problems presented when there is a lack of scientific knowledge with regard to a risk. This question arises following the European Union's recent decision to ban virginiamycin, and the ruling on that decision by the European Court of First Instance in the Pfizer Animal Health case. The authors suggest that while policy‐makers ostensibly pay due deference to scientific opinion, their final a…
Epistemology (3 works) · Law (3 works) · Law (3 works) · Political science (3 works) · Economics (2 works) · Environmental ethics (2 works) · Law and economics (2 works) · Mainstream (2 works) · Philosophy (2 works) · Philosophy (2 works)