Davide Mazzi
Biographic Data
| ID | 6701312 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Davide Mazzi |
| GIVEN NAMES | Davide |
| FAMILY NAME | Mazzi |
| SIGNATURE | MAZZI D |
| AFFILIATIONS | University of Modena and Reggio Emilia |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-2194-628X |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 3 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 0 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 3 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2018 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2026 |
| H-INDEX | 0 |
Animated by a Number of Fundamental Principles”
The aim of this paper is to combine a quantitative analysis of indicators of pragmatic argumentation with a qualitative investigation of the argument scheme in a corpus of Supreme Court of Ireland’s judgments. The quantitative analysis indicates that the Supreme Court’s argumentation tends to support judicial standpoints by focusing on the negative impact of alternative lines of argument, whether from other judgments or the parties’ submissions. …
The Irish Public Discourse on Covid-19 at the Intersection of Legislation, Fake News and Judicial Argumentation
“The diet is not suitable for all…”
This paper is aimed at analysing the discourse tools and argumentative resources at work in the debate on the Ketogenic Diet (KD), an increasingly popular regimen with far-reaching clinical implications. The study centred on two small comparable corpora including web-based materials from relevant stakeholders in the debate on the KD, namely health institutions, charities and the press from the UK and Ireland. From a methodological point of view, …
No prominent works on this page.
“The diet is not suitable for all…”
This paper is aimed at analysing the discourse tools and argumentative resources at work in the debate on the Ketogenic Diet (KD), an increasingly popular regimen with far-reaching clinical implications. The study centred on two small comparable corpora including web-based materials from relevant stakeholders in the debate on the KD, namely health institutions, charities and the press from the UK and Ireland. From a methodological point of view, …
The Irish Public Discourse on Covid-19 at the Intersection of Legislation, Fake News and Judicial Argumentation
Animated by a Number of Fundamental Principles”
The aim of this paper is to combine a quantitative analysis of indicators of pragmatic argumentation with a qualitative investigation of the argument scheme in a corpus of Supreme Court of Ireland’s judgments. The quantitative analysis indicates that the Supreme Court’s argumentation tends to support judicial standpoints by focusing on the negative impact of alternative lines of argument, whether from other judgments or the parties’ submissions. …
Argumentation theory (2 works) · Irish (2 works) · Legislation (2 works) · Argument (complex analysis (1 work) · Argumentation framework (1 work) · Biology (1 work) · Comparative and International Law Studies (1 work) · Computer Science (1 work) · COVID-19 Digital Contact Tracing (1 work) · Diet and metabolism studies (1 work)