Rahmi Oruç
Biographic Data
| ID | 6703110 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Rahmi Oruç |
| GIVEN NAMES | Rahmi |
| FAMILY NAME | Oruç |
| SIGNATURE | ORUÇ R |
| AFFILIATIONS | Ibn Haldun University |
| ORCID | 0000-0003-2350-5063 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 4 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 0 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 4 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2021 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2025 |
| H-INDEX | 0 |
The Virtuous Arguer as a Virtuous Sequencer
“Commendable in an Ottoman of his background”
This paper critically assesses Christopher Ferrard’s (d. 2024) contributions to the study of nineteenth-century Ottoman rhetorical scholarship. In particular, it examines Ferrard’s definition of rhetoric as necessarily grounded in national literary traditions and his assessment of the scholarly output based on its alignment with a nation-centric approach. We demonstrate how this conceptual framework results in favorable evaluations of scholars wh…
Assessing coherence and fidelity
Non-fictional narratives have an open-ended character that projects roles and values to those who participate in them. Narrative participation, in turn, entails narrative assessment and identification processes, through which adherence to values and positions may fail or be achieved. In the analysis of interviews with university students across Turkey, we draw on Fisher’s narrative paradigm to focus on how our participants carry out assessments o…
Uses, Motives, Functions, and Virtues of Silence in Argumentation in Light of Jadal and Ādāb al-Baḥth wa al-Munāẓarah
Munāẓarah procedure determines who has the right to speak and who should remain silent until his turn comes. In fact, proper argumentation requires each party to remain silent where the right to speak is not theirs. However, the argumentation process in practice does not always follow the ideal rules of behaviour. One such instance is verbal aggressiveness, which often leads to anger and rapid information exchange with the offender. Such verbal e…
No prominent works on this page.
Uses, Motives, Functions, and Virtues of Silence in Argumentation in Light of Jadal and Ādāb al-Baḥth wa al-Munāẓarah
Munāẓarah procedure determines who has the right to speak and who should remain silent until his turn comes. In fact, proper argumentation requires each party to remain silent where the right to speak is not theirs. However, the argumentation process in practice does not always follow the ideal rules of behaviour. One such instance is verbal aggressiveness, which often leads to anger and rapid information exchange with the offender. Such verbal e…
“Commendable in an Ottoman of his background”
This paper critically assesses Christopher Ferrard’s (d. 2024) contributions to the study of nineteenth-century Ottoman rhetorical scholarship. In particular, it examines Ferrard’s definition of rhetoric as necessarily grounded in national literary traditions and his assessment of the scholarly output based on its alignment with a nation-centric approach. We demonstrate how this conceptual framework results in favorable evaluations of scholars wh…
Assessing coherence and fidelity
Non-fictional narratives have an open-ended character that projects roles and values to those who participate in them. Narrative participation, in turn, entails narrative assessment and identification processes, through which adherence to values and positions may fail or be achieved. In the analysis of interviews with university students across Turkey, we draw on Fisher’s narrative paradigm to focus on how our participants carry out assessments o…
The Virtuous Arguer as a Virtuous Sequencer
Philosophy (4 works) · Epistemology (3 works) · Argumentation theory (2 works) · Argumentative (2 works) · Computer Science (2 works) · Political science (2 works) · Psychology (2 works) · Sociology (2 works) · Aesthetics (1 works) · Ambiguity (1 works)