Ole Martin Sandberg
Biographic Data
| ID | 6703887 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Ole Martin Sandberg |
| GIVEN NAMES | Ole Martin |
| FAMILY NAME | Sandberg |
| SIGNATURE | SANDBERG O M |
| AFFILIATIONS | University of Iceland |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-5764-6668 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 2 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 0 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 2 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2020 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2023 |
| H-INDEX | 0 |
'Everything Changes in Nature'
A frequent misunderstanding about Peter Kropotkin, and anarchism more generally, is that by emphasising mutual aid as a factor of evolution and history, he advocates a view of human nature as essentially benign. This essay aims to disprove that claim by showing that Kropotkin explicitly rejects any notion of a fixed human essence and insists that we are composed of a multitude of autonomous but interacting faculties with no authentic or essential…
Climate Disruption, Political Stability, and Collective Imagination
Many fear that climate change will lead to the collapse of civilization. I argue both that this is unlikely and that the fear is potentially harmful. Using examples from recent disasters I argue that climate change is more likely to intensify the existing social order—a truly terrifying prospect. The fear of civilizational collapse is part of the climate crisis; it makes us fear change and prevents us from imagining different social relations whi…
No prominent works on this page.
Climate Disruption, Political Stability, and Collective Imagination
Many fear that climate change will lead to the collapse of civilization. I argue both that this is unlikely and that the fear is potentially harmful. Using examples from recent disasters I argue that climate change is more likely to intensify the existing social order—a truly terrifying prospect. The fear of civilizational collapse is part of the climate crisis; it makes us fear change and prevents us from imagining different social relations whi…
'Everything Changes in Nature'
A frequent misunderstanding about Peter Kropotkin, and anarchism more generally, is that by emphasising mutual aid as a factor of evolution and history, he advocates a view of human nature as essentially benign. This essay aims to disprove that claim by showing that Kropotkin explicitly rejects any notion of a fixed human essence and insists that we are composed of a multitude of autonomous but interacting faculties with no authentic or essential…
Aesthetics (2 works) · Philosophy (2 works) · Sociology (2 works) · Affect (linguistics (1 work) · Anarchism and Radical Politics (1 work) · Civilization (1 work) · Climate change (1 work) · Climate Change Communication and Perception (1 work) · Economics (1 work) · Ecosystem dynamics and resilience (1 work)