Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Karen Gelb

Biographic Data

ID6716769
NAMEKaren Gelb
GIVEN NAMESKaren
FAMILY NAMEGelb
SIGNATUREGELB K
AFFILIATIONSThe University of Melbourne
ORCID0000-0002-9114-125X
VERIFIEDYes
TOTAL WORKS10
TOTAL CITATIONS23
WORKS AS AUTHOR9
WORKS AS EDITOR1
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR2011
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2025
H-INDEX3
  • Toward a Practice Framework for Throughcare Reintegration Programs

    Open Access•Aaron Hart, Karen Gelb et al.•ARTICLE•International Journal of Offender…•2025

    Practice frameworks for programs supporting people to transition between prison and community are a critical resource for service agencies, researchers and policy makers. Although reintegration programs are often commissioned with reference to Risk-Needs-Responsivity and the Good Lives Model, these frameworks lack specificity for practical program design. Following recent meta-theoretical guidelines, we articulate a practice framework for reinteg…

  • Why internet users’ perceptions of viewing child exploitation material matter for prevention policies

    Open Access•Charlotte Hunn, Caroline Spiranovic et al.•ARTICLE•Australian & New Zealand Journal…•2020

    There are claims that the societal appetite for ‘child exploitation material’ is increasing. Yet, Australia’s policy response does not include initiatives to dissuade potential offenders from deliberately viewing child exploitation material for the first time (onset). To critically examine this issue, this paper draws on Situational Crime Prevention theory. It argues that (a) many first-time child exploitation material viewers fit the Situational…

  • Juror and community views of the guilty plea sentencing discount

    Open Access•K Warner, Caroline Spiranovic et al.•ARTICLE•Criminology & Criminal Justice•2020•References: 2

    A plea of guilty is a long-accepted factor mitigating sentence in many countries, including Australia, although academic debate over the merits and application of the discount is ongoing. This paper presents findings from a national Australian study on public opinion on the guilty plea sentencing discount, with a particular focus on sexual offences. Survey data were drawn from 989 jurors in cases that resulted in a guilty verdict and 450 unempane…

  • Digital Evidence in the Jury Room

    Laura McDonald, Laura W McDonald et al.•ARTICLE•Current Issues in Criminal Justice•2015

    Wireless technology and mobile devices are transforming the way courts administer justice, with the increasing use of smartphones, iPads and other tablets by practitioners, judges and juries. In the jury room, mobile devices have the potential to simplify the provision and use of information and facilitate more efficient deliberations and overall decision-making. But before such technology can become commonplace in the jury room, courts would ben…

  • Penal diversity within Australia

    Open Access•Hilde Tubex, David Brown et al.•ARTICLE•Punishment & Society•2015•Cited by: 5•References: 9

    In this article, we start from internationally developed models explaining growing punitiveness and increasing imprisonment rates, to analyse the penal situation within Australia. While the eight Australian jurisdictions share many of the characteristics that have been identified as being important determinants of the size of the prison population, local features of these societies result in significant differences in punishment. The aim of the a…

  • Penal Populism, Sentencing Councils and Sentencing Policy

    Arie Freiberg, Karen Gelb•EDITOR•BOOK•Penal Populism, Sentencing…•2014

    Public outcries and political platforms based on misinformation and misconceptions about the criminal justice system and current sentencing practice occur all too often in democratic societies. Penal Populism, Sentencing Councils and Sentencing Policy attempts to address this problem by bringing together important contributions from a number of distinguished experts in the field.Penal Populism presents theoretical perspectives on the role of the …

  • Measuring the Effects of Small Group Deliberation on Public Attitudes towards Sentencing

    Geraldine Mackenzie, Nigel Stobbs et al.•ARTICLE•Current Issues in Criminal Justice•2014

    This article reports on the outcomes of small group deliberations on levels of punitiveness and public confidence in the sentencing functions of Australian criminal courts, conducted as part of a larger project investigating public attitudes to sentencing. One hypothesis of the project as a whole was that a more informed and involved public is likely to be less punitive in their views on the sentencing of offenders, and to express less cynical vi…

  • How have health promotion frameworks considered gender?

    Open Access•Karen Gelb, Ann Pederson et al.•ARTICLE•Health Promotion International•2012

    This paper provides an overview of five key internationally recognized health promotion frameworks and assesses their consideration of gender. This analysis was conducted as part of the Promoting Health in Women project, a Canadian initiative focused on generating a framework for effective health promotion for women. To date, no review of health promotion frameworks has specifically focused on assessing the treatment of gender. This analysis draw…

  • A matter of judgement

    Open Access•David Indermaur, Lynne D Roberts et al.•ARTICLE•Punishment & Society•2012•Cited by: 15•References: 6

    The idea of reducing public punitiveness through providing information and encouraging deliberation has attracted considerable interest. However, there remains no solid evidence of durable changes in attitude. The study presented here provides a test of the hypothesis that information combined with deliberation can affect general measures of punitiveness, confidence in the courts and acceptance of alternatives to imprisonment (the three dependent…

  • Public preferences for sentencing purposes

    Open Access•Caroline Spiranovic, Lynne D Roberts et al.•ARTICLE•Criminology & Criminal Justice•2011•Cited by: 3•References: 1

    Preferences of 800 randomly selected Australians for retributive and utilitarian sentencing purposes were examined in response to brief crime scenarios where offender age, offence type and offender history were systematically varied. Respondents selected rehabilitation as the most important purpose for first-time, young and burglary offenders. Punishment was endorsed as most important for repeat, adult and serious assault offenders. Multinomial l…

  • A matter of judgement

    Open Access•David Indermaur, Lynne D Roberts et al.•ARTICLE•Punishment & Society•2012•Cited by: 15•References: 6

    The idea of reducing public punitiveness through providing information and encouraging deliberation has attracted considerable interest. However, there remains no solid evidence of durable changes in attitude. The study presented here provides a test of the hypothesis that information combined with deliberation can affect general measures of punitiveness, confidence in the courts and acceptance of alternatives to imprisonment (the three dependent…

  • Penal diversity within Australia

    Open Access•Hilde Tubex, David Brown et al.•ARTICLE•Punishment & Society•2015•Cited by: 5•References: 9

    In this article, we start from internationally developed models explaining growing punitiveness and increasing imprisonment rates, to analyse the penal situation within Australia. While the eight Australian jurisdictions share many of the characteristics that have been identified as being important determinants of the size of the prison population, local features of these societies result in significant differences in punishment. The aim of the a…

  • Public preferences for sentencing purposes

    Open Access•Caroline Spiranovic, Lynne D Roberts et al.•ARTICLE•Criminology & Criminal Justice•2011•Cited by: 3•References: 1

    Preferences of 800 randomly selected Australians for retributive and utilitarian sentencing purposes were examined in response to brief crime scenarios where offender age, offence type and offender history were systematically varied. Respondents selected rehabilitation as the most important purpose for first-time, young and burglary offenders. Punishment was endorsed as most important for repeat, adult and serious assault offenders. Multinomial l…

  • Public preferences for sentencing purposes

    Open Access•Caroline Spiranovic, Lynne D Roberts et al.•ARTICLE•Criminology & Criminal Justice•2011•Cited by: 3•References: 1

    Preferences of 800 randomly selected Australians for retributive and utilitarian sentencing purposes were examined in response to brief crime scenarios where offender age, offence type and offender history were systematically varied. Respondents selected rehabilitation as the most important purpose for first-time, young and burglary offenders. Punishment was endorsed as most important for repeat, adult and serious assault offenders. Multinomial l…

  • How have health promotion frameworks considered gender?

    Open Access•Karen Gelb, Ann Pederson et al.•ARTICLE•Health Promotion International•2012

    This paper provides an overview of five key internationally recognized health promotion frameworks and assesses their consideration of gender. This analysis was conducted as part of the Promoting Health in Women project, a Canadian initiative focused on generating a framework for effective health promotion for women. To date, no review of health promotion frameworks has specifically focused on assessing the treatment of gender. This analysis draw…

  • A matter of judgement

    Open Access•David Indermaur, Lynne D Roberts et al.•ARTICLE•Punishment & Society•2012•Cited by: 15•References: 6

    The idea of reducing public punitiveness through providing information and encouraging deliberation has attracted considerable interest. However, there remains no solid evidence of durable changes in attitude. The study presented here provides a test of the hypothesis that information combined with deliberation can affect general measures of punitiveness, confidence in the courts and acceptance of alternatives to imprisonment (the three dependent…

  • Penal Populism, Sentencing Councils and Sentencing Policy

    Arie Freiberg, Karen Gelb•EDITOR•BOOK•Penal Populism, Sentencing…•2014

    Public outcries and political platforms based on misinformation and misconceptions about the criminal justice system and current sentencing practice occur all too often in democratic societies. Penal Populism, Sentencing Councils and Sentencing Policy attempts to address this problem by bringing together important contributions from a number of distinguished experts in the field.Penal Populism presents theoretical perspectives on the role of the …

  • Measuring the Effects of Small Group Deliberation on Public Attitudes towards Sentencing

    Geraldine Mackenzie, Nigel Stobbs et al.•ARTICLE•Current Issues in Criminal Justice•2014

    This article reports on the outcomes of small group deliberations on levels of punitiveness and public confidence in the sentencing functions of Australian criminal courts, conducted as part of a larger project investigating public attitudes to sentencing. One hypothesis of the project as a whole was that a more informed and involved public is likely to be less punitive in their views on the sentencing of offenders, and to express less cynical vi…

  • Digital Evidence in the Jury Room

    Laura McDonald, Laura W McDonald et al.•ARTICLE•Current Issues in Criminal Justice•2015

    Wireless technology and mobile devices are transforming the way courts administer justice, with the increasing use of smartphones, iPads and other tablets by practitioners, judges and juries. In the jury room, mobile devices have the potential to simplify the provision and use of information and facilitate more efficient deliberations and overall decision-making. But before such technology can become commonplace in the jury room, courts would ben…

  • Penal diversity within Australia

    Open Access•Hilde Tubex, David Brown et al.•ARTICLE•Punishment & Society•2015•Cited by: 5•References: 9

    In this article, we start from internationally developed models explaining growing punitiveness and increasing imprisonment rates, to analyse the penal situation within Australia. While the eight Australian jurisdictions share many of the characteristics that have been identified as being important determinants of the size of the prison population, local features of these societies result in significant differences in punishment. The aim of the a…

  • Why internet users’ perceptions of viewing child exploitation material matter for prevention policies

    Open Access•Charlotte Hunn, Caroline Spiranovic et al.•ARTICLE•Australian & New Zealand Journal…•2020

    There are claims that the societal appetite for ‘child exploitation material’ is increasing. Yet, Australia’s policy response does not include initiatives to dissuade potential offenders from deliberately viewing child exploitation material for the first time (onset). To critically examine this issue, this paper draws on Situational Crime Prevention theory. It argues that (a) many first-time child exploitation material viewers fit the Situational…

  • Juror and community views of the guilty plea sentencing discount

    Open Access•K Warner, Caroline Spiranovic et al.•ARTICLE•Criminology & Criminal Justice•2020•References: 2

    A plea of guilty is a long-accepted factor mitigating sentence in many countries, including Australia, although academic debate over the merits and application of the discount is ongoing. This paper presents findings from a national Australian study on public opinion on the guilty plea sentencing discount, with a particular focus on sexual offences. Survey data were drawn from 989 jurors in cases that resulted in a guilty verdict and 450 unempane…

  • Toward a Practice Framework for Throughcare Reintegration Programs

    Open Access•Aaron Hart, Karen Gelb et al.•ARTICLE•International Journal of Offender…•2025

    Practice frameworks for programs supporting people to transition between prison and community are a critical resource for service agencies, researchers and policy makers. Although reintegration programs are often commissioned with reference to Risk-Needs-Responsivity and the Good Lives Model, these frameworks lack specificity for practical program design. Following recent meta-theoretical guidelines, we articulate a practice framework for reinteg…

Political science (10 works) · Psychology (9 works) · Criminology (8 works) · Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (7 works) · Law (7 works) · Law (6 works) · Public relations (5 works) · Social Psychology (5 works) · Computer Science (4 works) · Homelessness and Social Issues (4 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae