Giuliano Espino
Biographic Data
| ID | 6728823 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Giuliano Espino |
| GIVEN NAMES | Giuliano |
| FAMILY NAME | Espino |
| SIGNATURE | ESPINO G |
| AFFILIATIONS | Northeastern University |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-3579-3261 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 4 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 0 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 4 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2022 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2026 |
| H-INDEX | 0 |
Calling Out the Court
The international ‘naming and shaming’ of nations to create a global baseline of human rights is often characterized as a strategy deployed in relation to authoritarian regimes. Shaming of electoral actors in liberal democracies has been found to be ineffectual at best and counterproductive at worst. In this article I expand upon the shaming literature to examine how judicial channels can be used to shame liberal democracies. I employ within-and-…
Which global constitution? The illiberal globalism of the US Supreme Court’s Dobbs decision
Fostering global constitutional discourse has long been anathema to the conservative legal movement within the United States. In Dobbs v Jackson Women’s Health Services , which overturned Roe v Wade ’s right to an abortion, the court’s conservative justices relied on a globalized analysis. In this article, I identify three potential hypotheses to explain this deviation from conservative orthodoxy. Dobbs ’ conservative globalism could be explained…
Listening to competing speakers
Rediscovering Epistemic Coalitions Twenty Years Later
This article aims to help the literature on global governance and international professionalism move beyond a myopic focus on epistemic communities by unpacking the underutilized term epistemic coalition. Epistemic coalitions are an international nonstate actor that employ a broadened notion of expertise to incorporate business and political advocates alongside technical experts. I differentiate epistemic coalitions from epistemic communities by …
No prominent works on this page.
Listening to competing speakers
Rediscovering Epistemic Coalitions Twenty Years Later
This article aims to help the literature on global governance and international professionalism move beyond a myopic focus on epistemic communities by unpacking the underutilized term epistemic coalition. Epistemic coalitions are an international nonstate actor that employ a broadened notion of expertise to incorporate business and political advocates alongside technical experts. I differentiate epistemic coalitions from epistemic communities by …
Which global constitution? The illiberal globalism of the US Supreme Court’s Dobbs decision
Fostering global constitutional discourse has long been anathema to the conservative legal movement within the United States. In Dobbs v Jackson Women’s Health Services , which overturned Roe v Wade ’s right to an abortion, the court’s conservative justices relied on a globalized analysis. In this article, I identify three potential hypotheses to explain this deviation from conservative orthodoxy. Dobbs ’ conservative globalism could be explained…
Calling Out the Court
The international ‘naming and shaming’ of nations to create a global baseline of human rights is often characterized as a strategy deployed in relation to authoritarian regimes. Shaming of electoral actors in liberal democracies has been found to be ineffectual at best and counterproductive at worst. In this article I expand upon the shaming literature to examine how judicial channels can be used to shame liberal democracies. I employ within-and-…
Law (3 works) · Political science (3 works) · Politics (3 works) · Sociology (3 works) · Supreme court (3 works) · Judicial and Constitutional Studies (2 works) · Law (2 works) · Political Influence and Corporate Strategies (2 works) · Commercial speech (1 work) · Constitution (1 work)