Diletta Marchesi
Biographic Data
| ID | 6742247 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Diletta Marchesi |
| GIVEN NAMES | Diletta |
| FAMILY NAME | Marchesi |
| SIGNATURE | MARCHESI D |
| AFFILIATIONS | KU Leuven |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-8329-4280 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 3 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 0 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 3 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2021 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2023 |
| H-INDEX | 0 |
Criminalizing Acts of Rebel Governance as War Crimes
This article explores whether it is appropriate on legal and policy grounds to criminalize as war crimes the acts of governance performed by non-state armed groups controlling territory. Using the administration of justice by armed groups and the Al Hassan case before the International Criminal Court as a reference point, it sheds light on the problems raised by the adoption of an overly broad definition of the war crimes’ nexus to the armed conf…
Human Rights Protections in Drawing Inferences from Criminal Suspects’ Silence
This article sheds comparative and contextual light on European and international human rights debates around the privilege against self-incrimination and the right to silence. It does so through an examination of adverse inferences from criminal suspect’s silence in three European jurisdictions with differing procedural traditions: Ireland, Italy and the Netherlands. The article highlights the manner in which adverse inferences have come to be d…
Intercepted Communications in the Ongwen Case
In the Ongwen judgment, the International Criminal Court ( icc ) deemed ‘highly probative evidence’ the Lord’s Resistance Army radio communications intercepted. However, the Defence had argued that it was unreliable evidence for several reasons. After considering the definition and regulatory framework governing the admission and assessment of documentary evidence at the icc and retracing the road intercept evidence made from Uganda to the Ongwen…
No prominent works on this page.
Human Rights Protections in Drawing Inferences from Criminal Suspects’ Silence
This article sheds comparative and contextual light on European and international human rights debates around the privilege against self-incrimination and the right to silence. It does so through an examination of adverse inferences from criminal suspect’s silence in three European jurisdictions with differing procedural traditions: Ireland, Italy and the Netherlands. The article highlights the manner in which adverse inferences have come to be d…
Intercepted Communications in the Ongwen Case
In the Ongwen judgment, the International Criminal Court ( icc ) deemed ‘highly probative evidence’ the Lord’s Resistance Army radio communications intercepted. However, the Defence had argued that it was unreliable evidence for several reasons. After considering the definition and regulatory framework governing the admission and assessment of documentary evidence at the icc and retracing the road intercept evidence made from Uganda to the Ongwen…
Criminalizing Acts of Rebel Governance as War Crimes
This article explores whether it is appropriate on legal and policy grounds to criminalize as war crimes the acts of governance performed by non-state armed groups controlling territory. Using the administration of justice by armed groups and the Al Hassan case before the International Criminal Court as a reference point, it sheds light on the problems raised by the adoption of an overly broad definition of the war crimes’ nexus to the armed conf…
Political science (3 works) · Criminology (2 works) · International Law and Human Rights (2 works) · Law (2 works) · Law (2 works) · Sociology (2 works) · Business (1 work) · CLARITY (1 work) · Context (archaeology (1 work) · Corporate governance (1 work)