Teresa L Deshields
Biographic Data
| ID | 6763638 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Teresa L Deshields |
| GIVEN NAMES | Teresa L |
| FAMILY NAME | Deshields |
| SIGNATURE | DESHIELDS T L |
| AFFILIATIONS | Barnes-Jewish Hospital |
| ORCID | 0000-0001-6403-411X |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 2 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 0 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 2 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2008 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2011 |
| H-INDEX | 0 |
Assessment of Consent Capability in Psychiatric and Medical Studies
In order to evaluate psychiatric factors that potentially influence assessment of consent capacity, 195 IRB members read summaries of hypothetical medical (cancer vs. neuropathic pain) and psychiatric trials. They then rated research participants' capacity for consent (capable or not capable), autonomy, and decisional abilities, as well as the legal risk to the institution of the study. Levels of depression information varied across the medical d…
IRB Member Judgments of Decisional Capacity, Coercion, and Risk in Medical and Psychiatric Studies
WHILE INDIVIDUALS WITH PSYCHIATRIC illnesses are widely considered a special class of research subjects regarding decisional capacity and coercion vulnerability, those with physical illnesses often are not. IRB members (N = 127) read vignettes that described clinical research targeting one of two levels of disease severity (high/low) for psychiatric or medical diagnoses. They then rated decisional capacity, coercion, and risks for hypothetical re…
No prominent works on this page.
IRB Member Judgments of Decisional Capacity, Coercion, and Risk in Medical and Psychiatric Studies
WHILE INDIVIDUALS WITH PSYCHIATRIC illnesses are widely considered a special class of research subjects regarding decisional capacity and coercion vulnerability, those with physical illnesses often are not. IRB members (N = 127) read vignettes that described clinical research targeting one of two levels of disease severity (high/low) for psychiatric or medical diagnoses. They then rated decisional capacity, coercion, and risks for hypothetical re…
Assessment of Consent Capability in Psychiatric and Medical Studies
In order to evaluate psychiatric factors that potentially influence assessment of consent capacity, 195 IRB members read summaries of hypothetical medical (cancer vs. neuropathic pain) and psychiatric trials. They then rated research participants' capacity for consent (capable or not capable), autonomy, and decisional abilities, as well as the legal risk to the institution of the study. Levels of depression information varied across the medical d…
Alternative medicine (2 works) · Clinical Psychology (2 works) · Clinical Psychology (2 works) · Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (2 works) · Informed consent (2 works) · Medicine (2 works) · Psychiatry (2 works) · Psychology (2 works) · Autonomy (1 work) · Clinical trial (1 work)