Marty Alvarez
Biographic Data
| ID | 6764532 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Marty Alvarez |
| GIVEN NAMES | Marty |
| FAMILY NAME | Alvarez |
| SIGNATURE | ALVAREZ M |
| AFFILIATIONS | Harvard University |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 3 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 0 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 3 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2019 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2022 |
| H-INDEX | 0 |
Characterizing the Environmental Health Literacy and Sensemaking of Indoor Air Quality of Research Participants
This study is based on in-depth semi-structured interviews with the participants of an indoor air quality monitoring study. The purpose of the interviews was to capture participants' perceptions of indoor air quality and engage them in a discussion of those factors that influenced their behavior. Interview study participants ( n = 20) noted the importance of family health concerns and their own sensory awareness of possible contaminants. They dis…
Reporting Results of a Community-Based In-Home Exposure Monitoring Study
Our report back process and materials benefitted from the contributions of multiple diverse stakeholders. We recommend at least a two-part strategy for facilitating communication within the community and between community and academic researchers. The materials and methods can be easily adapted by other researchers to report back exposure results in other community-specific contexts
A Mixed Methods Evaluation of Sharing Air Pollution Results with Study Participants via Report-Back Communication
We implemented a concurrent triangulation mixed-methods evaluation of an air pollution data report-back to study participants in Chelsea, Massachusetts. We aimed to determine whether the report-back was effective in the following three ways: engagement, understandability, and actionability for the participants. We also evaluated participants' valuation of the report-back information and process. The evaluation involved both qualitative components…
No prominent works on this page.
A Mixed Methods Evaluation of Sharing Air Pollution Results with Study Participants via Report-Back Communication
We implemented a concurrent triangulation mixed-methods evaluation of an air pollution data report-back to study participants in Chelsea, Massachusetts. We aimed to determine whether the report-back was effective in the following three ways: engagement, understandability, and actionability for the participants. We also evaluated participants' valuation of the report-back information and process. The evaluation involved both qualitative components…
Reporting Results of a Community-Based In-Home Exposure Monitoring Study
Our report back process and materials benefitted from the contributions of multiple diverse stakeholders. We recommend at least a two-part strategy for facilitating communication within the community and between community and academic researchers. The materials and methods can be easily adapted by other researchers to report back exposure results in other community-specific contexts
Characterizing the Environmental Health Literacy and Sensemaking of Indoor Air Quality of Research Participants
This study is based on in-depth semi-structured interviews with the participants of an indoor air quality monitoring study. The purpose of the interviews was to capture participants' perceptions of indoor air quality and engage them in a discussion of those factors that influenced their behavior. Interview study participants ( n = 20) noted the importance of family health concerns and their own sensory awareness of possible contaminants. They dis…
Computer Science (3 works) · Psychology (3 works) · Sociology (3 works) · Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting (2 works) · Applied Psychology (2 works) · Applied Psychology (2 works) · Environmental Education and Sustainability (2 works) · Health care (2 works) · Health literacy (2 works) · Indoor air quality (2 works)