Rachel Pougnet
Biographic Data
| ID | 6791423 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Rachel Pougnet |
| GIVEN NAMES | Rachel |
| FAMILY NAME | Pougnet |
| SIGNATURE | POUGNET R |
| AFFILIATIONS | Max Planck Institute for the Study of Crime, Security and Law |
| ORCID | 0000-0001-7504-6837 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 2 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 1 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 2 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2023 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2025 |
| H-INDEX | 1 |
Resistances to citizenship deprivation’s sweeping march
This article responds to emerging claims within the literature to take politics seriously when explaining state’s security practices. In particular, it examines failures to expand citizenship deprivation powers on terrorism grounds and argues that the analytical framework of “failed securitisation” cannot alone explain these resistances. This article claims that critical security studies should take state’s constitutional structures into consider…
Citizenship Deprivation in the Courts
Citizenship deprivation on security grounds – Difference in state practices – Underlying citizenship regimes and states’ constitutional structures – Constitutional roles attributed to the citizen – Judicial decisions on citizenship deprivation – Comparison with a focus on France and the United Kingdom
Citizenship Deprivation in the Courts
Citizenship deprivation on security grounds – Difference in state practices – Underlying citizenship regimes and states’ constitutional structures – Constitutional roles attributed to the citizen – Judicial decisions on citizenship deprivation – Comparison with a focus on France and the United Kingdom
Citizenship Deprivation in the Courts
Citizenship deprivation on security grounds – Difference in state practices – Underlying citizenship regimes and states’ constitutional structures – Constitutional roles attributed to the citizen – Judicial decisions on citizenship deprivation – Comparison with a focus on France and the United Kingdom
Resistances to citizenship deprivation’s sweeping march
This article responds to emerging claims within the literature to take politics seriously when explaining state’s security practices. In particular, it examines failures to expand citizenship deprivation powers on terrorism grounds and argues that the analytical framework of “failed securitisation” cannot alone explain these resistances. This article claims that critical security studies should take state’s constitutional structures into consider…
Citizenship (1 works) · Constitution (1 works) · Constitutional law (1 works) · European and International Law Studies (1 works) · Global Security and Public Health (1 works) · Human Rights and Development (1 works) · Human Rights and Immigration (1 works) · Migration, Refugees, and Integration (1 works) · Political Systems and Governance (1 works) · Politics (1 works)