Emma Bruce
Biographic Data
| ID | 6805719 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Emma Bruce |
| GIVEN NAMES | Emma |
| FAMILY NAME | Bruce |
| SIGNATURE | BRUCE E |
| AFFILIATIONS | McMaster University |
| ORCID | 0009-0006-9363-0547 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 8 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 1 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 8 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2020 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2026 |
| H-INDEX | 1 |
How Is Equity‐Based Co‐Creation Enacted in Health and Social Services? An Evaluation of Four Case Studies
INTRODUCTION: Co-creation processes are part of a movement to create change in collaboration with people with lived and living experience (PWLLE); in this paper we focus on experience with health and social services. Research co-creation with PWLLE is increasing, however, processes tend to include people who are well connected in health and research environments, often excluding equity-deserving groups (EDGs) who experience barriers to engagement…
Karen Tongson, Normporn
Test score validity periods for high-stakes language tests
Several high-stakes English proficiency tests including but not limited to IELTS, PTE Academic, and TOEFL iBT recommend a 2-year time limit on validity for score usage. Although this timeframe provides a useful rule-of-thumb for the recency of testing, it can have far-reaching consequences. In response to stakeholder queries around IELTS validity period recommendations, researchers from the British Council and Cambridge University Press & Assessm…
Advancing a collective vision for equity‐based cocreation through prototyping at an international forum
BACKGROUND: Cocreation has the potential to engage people with lived and living experiences in the design and evaluation of health and social services. However, guidance is needed to better include people from equity-deserving groups (EDGs), who are more likely to face barriers to participation, experience ongoing or historical harm, and benefit from accessible methods of engagement. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this international forum (CoPro2022) was …
Open Science should be welcomed by test providers but grounded in pragmatic caution
This article is temporarily under embargo
Unpacking the potential of developmental evaluation in codesign work
Creative processes in co-designing a co-design hub
Background: Co-design is an approach to engaging stakeholders in health and social system change that is rapidly gaining traction, yet there are also questions about the extent to which there is meaningful engagement of structurally vulnerable communities and whether co-design leads to lasting system change. The McMaster University Co-Design Hub with Vulnerable Populations Hub (‘the Hub’) is a three-year interdisciplinary project with the goal of…
Are you really doing ‘codesign’? Critical reflections when working with vulnerable populations
‘Codesign’ and associated terms such as ‘coproduction’ or ‘patient engagement’, are increasingly common in the health research literature, due to an increased emphasis on the importance of ensuring that research related to service/systems development is meaningful to end-users. However, there continues to be a lack of clarity regarding the key principles and practices of codesign, and wide variation in the extent to which service users are meanin…
Creative processes in co-designing a co-design hub
Background: Co-design is an approach to engaging stakeholders in health and social system change that is rapidly gaining traction, yet there are also questions about the extent to which there is meaningful engagement of structurally vulnerable communities and whether co-design leads to lasting system change. The McMaster University Co-Design Hub with Vulnerable Populations Hub (‘the Hub’) is a three-year interdisciplinary project with the goal of…
Are you really doing ‘codesign’? Critical reflections when working with vulnerable populations
‘Codesign’ and associated terms such as ‘coproduction’ or ‘patient engagement’, are increasingly common in the health research literature, due to an increased emphasis on the importance of ensuring that research related to service/systems development is meaningful to end-users. However, there continues to be a lack of clarity regarding the key principles and practices of codesign, and wide variation in the extent to which service users are meanin…
Creative processes in co-designing a co-design hub
Background: Co-design is an approach to engaging stakeholders in health and social system change that is rapidly gaining traction, yet there are also questions about the extent to which there is meaningful engagement of structurally vulnerable communities and whether co-design leads to lasting system change. The McMaster University Co-Design Hub with Vulnerable Populations Hub (‘the Hub’) is a three-year interdisciplinary project with the goal of…
Unpacking the potential of developmental evaluation in codesign work
Advancing a collective vision for equity‐based cocreation through prototyping at an international forum
BACKGROUND: Cocreation has the potential to engage people with lived and living experiences in the design and evaluation of health and social services. However, guidance is needed to better include people from equity-deserving groups (EDGs), who are more likely to face barriers to participation, experience ongoing or historical harm, and benefit from accessible methods of engagement. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this international forum (CoPro2022) was …
Open Science should be welcomed by test providers but grounded in pragmatic caution
This article is temporarily under embargo
Test score validity periods for high-stakes language tests
Several high-stakes English proficiency tests including but not limited to IELTS, PTE Academic, and TOEFL iBT recommend a 2-year time limit on validity for score usage. Although this timeframe provides a useful rule-of-thumb for the recency of testing, it can have far-reaching consequences. In response to stakeholder queries around IELTS validity period recommendations, researchers from the British Council and Cambridge University Press & Assessm…
How Is Equity‐Based Co‐Creation Enacted in Health and Social Services? An Evaluation of Four Case Studies
INTRODUCTION: Co-creation processes are part of a movement to create change in collaboration with people with lived and living experience (PWLLE); in this paper we focus on experience with health and social services. Research co-creation with PWLLE is increasing, however, processes tend to include people who are well connected in health and research environments, often excluding equity-deserving groups (EDGs) who experience barriers to engagement…
Karen Tongson, Normporn
Sociology (4 works) · Health Policy Implementation Science (3 works) · Mental Health and Patient Involvement (3 works) · Psychology (3 works) · Qualitative research (3 works) · Computer Science (2 works) · Medicine (2 works) · Political science (2 works) · Process management (2 works) · Public relations (2 works)