Julia E M S Nabel

Biographic Data

ID6819735
NAMEJulia E M S Nabel
GIVEN NAMESJulia E M S
FAMILY NAMENabel
SIGNATURENABEL J E M S
AFFILIATIONSMax Planck Institute for Meteorology
ORCID0000-0002-8122-5206
VERIFIEDYes
TOTAL WORKS12
TOTAL CITATIONS0
AUTHOR COUNT12
EDITOR COUNT0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR2010
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2022
H-INDEX0

  • Global Carbon Budget 2021

    Open AccessPierre Friedlingstein, Matthew W Jones et al.ARTICLEEarth System Science Data2022

    Accurate assessment of anthropogenic carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions andtheir redistribution among the atmosphere, ocean, and terrestrial biospherein a changing climate is critical to better understand the global carboncycle, support the development of climate policies, and project futureclimate change. Here we describe and synthesize datasets and methodology toquantify the five major components of the global carbon budget and theiruncertainties. …

  • Uncertainty in land carbon budget simulated by terrestrial biosphere models: The role of atmospheric forcing

    Open AccessLucas Hardouin, Christine Delire et al.ARTICLEEnvironmental Research Letters2022

    Global estimates of the land carbon sink are often based on simulations by terrestrial biosphere models (TBMs). The use of a large number of models that differ in their underlying hypotheses, structure and parameters is one way to assess the uncertainty in the historical land carbon sink. Here we show that the atmospheric forcing datasets used to drive these TBMs represent a significant source of uncertainty that is currently not systematically a…

  • Global and regional drivers of land-use emissions in 1961–2017

    Open AccessChaopeng Hong, Jennifer A Burney et al.ARTICLENature2021

  • Dynamic global vegetation models underestimate net CO 2 flux mean and inter-annual variability in dryland ecosystems

    Open AccessNatasha MacBean, Russell L Scott et al.ARTICLEEnvironmental Research Letters2021

    Despite their sparse vegetation, dryland regions exert a huge influence over global biogeochemical cycles because they cover more than 40% of the world surface (Schimel 2010 Science 327 418–9). It is thought that drylands dominate the inter-annual variability (IAV) and long-term trend in the global carbon (C) cycle (Poulter et al 2014 Nature 509 600–3, Ahlstrom et al 2015 Science 348 895–9, Zhang et al 2018 Glob. Change Biol . 24 3954–68). Projec…

  • Five years of variability in the global carbon cycle: Comparing an estimate from the Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 and process-based models

    Open AccessZichong Chen, D N Huntzinger et al.ARTICLEEnvironmental Research Letters2021

    Year-to-year variability in CO 2 fluxes can yield insight into climate-carbon cycle relationships, a fundamental yet uncertain aspect of the terrestrial carbon cycle. In this study, we use global observations from NASA’s Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 (OCO-2) satellite for years 2015–2019 and a geostatistical inverse model to evaluate 5 years of interannual variability (IAV) in CO 2 fluxes and its relationships with environmental drivers. OCO-2 la…

  • Global Carbon Budget 2020

    Open AccessPierre Friedlingstein, Mike O’Sullivan et al.ARTICLEEarth System Science Data2020

    Accurate assessment of anthropogenic carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions andtheir redistribution among the atmosphere, ocean, and terrestrial biospherein a changing climate – the “global carbon budget” – is important tobetter understand the global carbon cycle, support the development ofclimate policies, and project future climate change. Here we describe andsynthesize data sets and methodology to quantify the five major componentsof the global carbon…

  • Increased atmospheric vapor pressure deficit reduces global vegetation growth

    Open AccessWenping Yuan, Yi Zheng et al.ARTICLEScience Advances2019

    Global vegetation greening trend stalled after the late 1990s due to increased atmospheric water demand.

  • Global Carbon Budget 2019

    Open AccessPierre Friedlingstein, Matthew W Jones et al.ARTICLEEarth System Science Data2019

    Accurate assessment of anthropogenic carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions andtheir redistribution among the atmosphere, ocean, and terrestrial biosphere– the “global carbon budget” – is important to better understand theglobal carbon cycle, support the development of climate policies, andproject future climate change. Here we describe data sets and methodology toquantify the five major components of the global carbon budget and theiruncertainties. Foss…

  • Global Carbon Budget 2018

    Open AccessCorinne Le Quéré, Robbie M Andrew et al.ARTICLEEarth System Science Data2018

    Accurate assessment of anthropogenic carbon dioxide(CO2) emissions and their redistribution among the atmosphere,ocean, and terrestrial biosphere – the “global carbon budget” – isimportant to better understand the global carbon cycle, support thedevelopment of climate policies, and project future climate change. Here wedescribe data sets and methodology to quantify the five major components ofthe global carbon budget and their uncertainties. Foss…

  • Input-driven versus turnover-driven controls of simulated changes in soil carbon due to land-use change

    Open AccessSylvia S Nyawira, Julia E M S Nabel et al.ARTICLEEnvironmental Research Letters2017

    Historical changes in soil carbon associated with land-use change (LUC) result mainly from the changes in the quantity of litter inputs to the soil and the turnover of carbon in soils. We use a factor separation technique to assess how the input-driven and turnover-driven controls, as well as their synergies, have contributed to historical changes in soil carbon associated with LUC. We apply this approach to equilibrium simulations of present-day…

  • Global Carbon Budget 2016

    Open AccessCorinne Le Quéré, Robbie M Andrew et al.ARTICLEEarth System Science Data2016

    Accurate assessment of anthropogenic carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions and their redistribution among the atmosphere, ocean, and terrestrial biosphere – the “global carbon budget” – is important to better understand the global carbon cycle, support the development of climate policies, and project future climate change. Here we describe data sets and methodology to quantify all major components of the global carbon budget, including their uncertainti…

  • Analysis of the Copenhagen Accord pledges and its global climatic impacts—a snapshot of dissonant ambitions

    Open AccessJoeri Rogelj, Claudine Chen et al.ARTICLEEnvironmental Research Letters2010

    This analysis of the Copenhagen Accord evaluates emission reduction pledges by individual countries against the Accord's climate-related objectives. Probabilistic estimates of the climatic consequences for a set of resulting multi-gas scenarios over the 21st century are calculated with a reduced complexity climate model, yielding global temperature increase and atmospheric CO 2 and CO 2 -equivalent concentrations. Provisions for banked surplus em…