Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Francesco Contini

Biographic Data

ID6911221
NAMEFrancesco Contini
GIVEN NAMESFrancesco
FAMILY NAMEContini
SIGNATURECONTINI F
AFFILIATIONSNational Research Council
ORCID0000-0002-8099-9728
VERIFIEDYes
TOTAL WORKS7
TOTAL CITATIONS0
WORKS AS AUTHOR7
WORKS AS EDITOR0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR2011
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2024
H-INDEX0
  • Artificial intelligence and real decisions

    Open Access•Francesco Contini, ALESSANDRA MINISSALE et al.•ARTICLE•Frontiers in Sociology•2024•References: 5

    The use of artificial intelligence in law represents one of the biggest challenges across different legal systems. Supporters of predictive systems believe that decisionmaking could be more efficient, consistent and predictable by using AI. European legislation and legal scholars, however, identify areas where AI developments are at high risk or too dangerous to be used in judicial proceedings. In this article, we contribute to this debate by pro…

  • Condition Critical

    Open Access•Patrícia Branco, Francesco Contini et al.•ARTICLE•Law Technology and Humans•2023

    The introduction to the ‘Condition Critical’ symposium explains the background to the series on the climatic and pandemic crises at the beginning of the 2020s. What is the role of the law in times of crisis? How does this force for continuity, predictability and order react to the discontinuity characteristic of disasters? The suspension of the law or its day-to-day operations is a moment of extreme danger, rivalling that of the disaster itself, …

  • The Never-Ending Crisis of Italian Justice

    Open Access•Francesco Contini•ARTICLE•Law Technology and Humans•2023

    This article analyses four critical dimensions of the Italian justice system’s enduring condition critical: poor predictability of judicial decisions, lack of integrity, low trust, and excessive length of judicial procedures. While the first three critical areas have multiple causes, the role of the dual judicial governance structure, with competencies split between the Ministry of Justice and the Judicial Council, is identified as a relevant cau…

  • Double normalization

    Open Access•Francesco Contini, Dory Reiling•ARTICLE•Oñati Socio-legal Series•2022

    The comparison of three e-justice platforms (EJP) leads to the identification of a common dynamic – called double normalization – which makes EJP development an institutional and constitutional issue, not just a functional one. The case study analysis of Trial on Line in Italy, e-Curia (Court of Justice of the European Union) and Kwaliteit en Innovatie rechtspraak in the Netherlands shows how EJPs, establishing the working environment for judges,…

  • Norm, normal and disruption

    Open Access•Richard Mohr, Francesco Contini et al.•ARTICLE•Oñati Socio-legal Series•2022

    The eleven papers in this special issue analyze how different sources of disruption collide with normality, the consequences on individual, social and institutional life, and efforts to re-establish the old or to create a new normal. They arose from a series of online seminars in September and October 2020 investigating normality, disruption and normalization in the wake of the current environmental, technological, epidemiological and socio-econo…

  • Artificial Intelligence and the Transformation of Humans, Law and Technology Interactions in Judicial Proceedings

    Open Access•Francesco Contini•ARTICLE•Law Technology and Humans•2020

    The paper connects the potentially disruptive effects of Artificial Intelligence (AI) deployment in the administration of justice to the pre-existing trajectories and consequences of court technology development. The theoretical framework combines Luhmann’s theory of technology with actor–network theory to analyse how the new digital environment affects judicial agency. Then, it explores law and technology dynamics to map out the conditions that …

  • Reassembling the Legal

    Richard Mohr, Francesco Contini•ARTICLE•Griffith Law Review•2011

    The article analyses the ways in which technology and law disperse, channel and reassemble agency in ICT-enabled legal proceedings. It works from case studies of online civil claims in England and Italy, and the automatically issued speed camera fine process in Australia. Information and communication technologies affect legal procedures in three dimensions: legitimacy, efficacy and performativity. The law can legitimate ensembles of technologica…

No prominent works on this page.

  • Reassembling the Legal

    Richard Mohr, Francesco Contini•ARTICLE•Griffith Law Review•2011

    The article analyses the ways in which technology and law disperse, channel and reassemble agency in ICT-enabled legal proceedings. It works from case studies of online civil claims in England and Italy, and the automatically issued speed camera fine process in Australia. Information and communication technologies affect legal procedures in three dimensions: legitimacy, efficacy and performativity. The law can legitimate ensembles of technologica…

  • Artificial Intelligence and the Transformation of Humans, Law and Technology Interactions in Judicial Proceedings

    Open Access•Francesco Contini•ARTICLE•Law Technology and Humans•2020

    The paper connects the potentially disruptive effects of Artificial Intelligence (AI) deployment in the administration of justice to the pre-existing trajectories and consequences of court technology development. The theoretical framework combines Luhmann’s theory of technology with actor–network theory to analyse how the new digital environment affects judicial agency. Then, it explores law and technology dynamics to map out the conditions that …

  • Double normalization

    Open Access•Francesco Contini, Dory Reiling•ARTICLE•Oñati Socio-legal Series•2022

    The comparison of three e-justice platforms (EJP) leads to the identification of a common dynamic – called double normalization – which makes EJP development an institutional and constitutional issue, not just a functional one. The case study analysis of Trial on Line in Italy, e-Curia (Court of Justice of the European Union) and Kwaliteit en Innovatie rechtspraak in the Netherlands shows how EJPs, establishing the working environment for judges,…

  • Norm, normal and disruption

    Open Access•Richard Mohr, Francesco Contini et al.•ARTICLE•Oñati Socio-legal Series•2022

    The eleven papers in this special issue analyze how different sources of disruption collide with normality, the consequences on individual, social and institutional life, and efforts to re-establish the old or to create a new normal. They arose from a series of online seminars in September and October 2020 investigating normality, disruption and normalization in the wake of the current environmental, technological, epidemiological and socio-econo…

  • Condition Critical

    Open Access•Patrícia Branco, Francesco Contini et al.•ARTICLE•Law Technology and Humans•2023

    The introduction to the ‘Condition Critical’ symposium explains the background to the series on the climatic and pandemic crises at the beginning of the 2020s. What is the role of the law in times of crisis? How does this force for continuity, predictability and order react to the discontinuity characteristic of disasters? The suspension of the law or its day-to-day operations is a moment of extreme danger, rivalling that of the disaster itself, …

  • The Never-Ending Crisis of Italian Justice

    Open Access•Francesco Contini•ARTICLE•Law Technology and Humans•2023

    This article analyses four critical dimensions of the Italian justice system’s enduring condition critical: poor predictability of judicial decisions, lack of integrity, low trust, and excessive length of judicial procedures. While the first three critical areas have multiple causes, the role of the dual judicial governance structure, with competencies split between the Ministry of Justice and the Judicial Council, is identified as a relevant cau…

  • Artificial intelligence and real decisions

    Open Access•Francesco Contini, ALESSANDRA MINISSALE et al.•ARTICLE•Frontiers in Sociology•2024•References: 5

    The use of artificial intelligence in law represents one of the biggest challenges across different legal systems. Supporters of predictive systems believe that decisionmaking could be more efficient, consistent and predictable by using AI. European legislation and legal scholars, however, identify areas where AI developments are at high risk or too dangerous to be used in judicial proceedings. In this article, we contribute to this debate by pro…

Political science (7 works) · Sociology (7 works) · Law (6 works) · Artificial Intelligence in Law (3 works) · Computer Science (3 works) · Economic Justice (3 works) · Epistemology (3 works) · Ethics and Social Impacts of AI (3 works) · Law and economics (3 works) · Law, AI, and Intellectual Property (3 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae