Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Carl Gene Fordham

Biographic Data

ID6916159
NAMECarl Gene Fordham
GIVEN NAMESCarl Gene
FAMILY NAMEFordham
SIGNATUREFORDHAM C G
AFFILIATIONSKing University
VERIFIEDNo
TOTAL WORKS3
TOTAL CITATIONS1
AUTHOR COUNT3
EDITOR COUNT0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR2019
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2020
H-INDEX1
  • The Huang Kan Commentary on the Analects: A Critical Examination

    Carl Gene Fordham•ARTICLE•Journal of Chinese Literature and…•2020•Cited by: 1

    This article discusses changes in the legacy of the Huang Kan 皇侃 (488–545) commentary on the Analects, or the Lunyu yishu 論語義疏, and outlines its textual history in China, specifically its bibliography and the various extant and nonextant editions. The author also examines the transmission and reception of the text in Japan, the ancient handwritten copies currently available, and the origin, back-transmission, and reprinting of the Nemoto edition.…

  • An Alternative Chronology for the Xia Dynasty and Discussion on Issues Related to Xia Culture

    Open Access•Hongbo Jia, Carl Gene Fordham•ARTICLE•Journal of Chinese Humanities•2019

    This paper proposes an alternative chronology for the Xia dynasty [ca. 2100-1600 BCE ] based on the respective year counts and generation numbers of the Xia, Shang [ca. 1600-1046 BCE ], and Zhou [1046-256 BCE ] dynasties. It argues that Qi 啟 founded the Xia dynasty midway through the twentieth century BCE and further discusses questions relating to the capital cities and culture of the Xia. By integrating archeological material, it further conten…

  • Faithful History or Unreliable History: Three Debates on the Historicity of the Xia Dynasty

    Open Access•Minzhen Chen, Carl Gene Fordham•ARTICLE•Journal of Chinese Humanities•2019

    Three debates on the historicity of the Xia dynasty [ca. 2100-1600 BCE ] have occurred, spanning the 1920s and 1930s, the late 1900s and early 2000s, and recent years. In the first debate, Gu Jiegang 顧頡剛 [1893-1980], Wang Guowei 王國維 [1877-1927], and Xu Xusheng 徐旭生 [1888-1976] pioneered three avenues for exploring the history of the Xia period. The second debate unfolded in the context of the Doubting Antiquity School [ Yigupai 疑古派] and the Believ…

  • The Huang Kan Commentary on the Analects: A Critical Examination

    Carl Gene Fordham•ARTICLE•Journal of Chinese Literature and…•2020•Cited by: 1

    This article discusses changes in the legacy of the Huang Kan 皇侃 (488–545) commentary on the Analects, or the Lunyu yishu 論語義疏, and outlines its textual history in China, specifically its bibliography and the various extant and nonextant editions. The author also examines the transmission and reception of the text in Japan, the ancient handwritten copies currently available, and the origin, back-transmission, and reprinting of the Nemoto edition.…

  • An Alternative Chronology for the Xia Dynasty and Discussion on Issues Related to Xia Culture

    Open Access•Hongbo Jia, Carl Gene Fordham•ARTICLE•Journal of Chinese Humanities•2019

    This paper proposes an alternative chronology for the Xia dynasty [ca. 2100-1600 BCE ] based on the respective year counts and generation numbers of the Xia, Shang [ca. 1600-1046 BCE ], and Zhou [1046-256 BCE ] dynasties. It argues that Qi 啟 founded the Xia dynasty midway through the twentieth century BCE and further discusses questions relating to the capital cities and culture of the Xia. By integrating archeological material, it further conten…

  • Faithful History or Unreliable History: Three Debates on the Historicity of the Xia Dynasty

    Open Access•Minzhen Chen, Carl Gene Fordham•ARTICLE•Journal of Chinese Humanities•2019

    Three debates on the historicity of the Xia dynasty [ca. 2100-1600 BCE ] have occurred, spanning the 1920s and 1930s, the late 1900s and early 2000s, and recent years. In the first debate, Gu Jiegang 顧頡剛 [1893-1980], Wang Guowei 王國維 [1877-1927], and Xu Xusheng 徐旭生 [1888-1976] pioneered three avenues for exploring the history of the Xia period. The second debate unfolded in the context of the Doubting Antiquity School [ Yigupai 疑古派] and the Believ…

  • The Huang Kan Commentary on the Analects: A Critical Examination

    Carl Gene Fordham•ARTICLE•Journal of Chinese Literature and…•2020•Cited by: 1

    This article discusses changes in the legacy of the Huang Kan 皇侃 (488–545) commentary on the Analects, or the Lunyu yishu 論語義疏, and outlines its textual history in China, specifically its bibliography and the various extant and nonextant editions. The author also examines the transmission and reception of the text in Japan, the ancient handwritten copies currently available, and the origin, back-transmission, and reprinting of the Nemoto edition.…

Chinese history and philosophy (3 works) · History (3 works) · Japanese History and Culture (3 works) · Ancient history (2 works) · Archaeology (2 works) · Art (2 works) · Classics (2 works) · Law (2 works) · Political science (2 works) · Sociology (2 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae