Shu Ishida
Biographic Data
| ID | 7101920 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Shu Ishida |
| GIVEN NAMES | Shu |
| FAMILY NAME | Ishida |
| SIGNATURE | ISHIDA S |
| AFFILIATIONS | Hiroshima University |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-7532-6086 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 6 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 0 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 6 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2021 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2026 |
| H-INDEX | 0 |
A comparative analysis of attitudes toward neuroscience and the application of information on the brain between the public and neuroscientists in Japan
Recent technological advancements have expanded our capacity to observe, decode, and modulate human brain activity. As these brain information (BI) technologies evolve, it becomes increasingly important to address relevant ethical, legal, and social issues and to communicate them effectively to the public. However, meaningful dialogue has been hindered by a limited understanding of how attitudes toward BI technologies differ between experts and t…
Multi-species Population Ethics with Critical Levels
This paper explores the notion of species-relative critical levels, which is a crucial ethical issue in multi-species population ethics. First, the formal conditions are provided under which there are species-relative critical levels (e.g., the critical level for human beings is different from that for non-human beings). In particular, we find it a salient question of animal ethics whether the existence of a human being is morally better than tha…
Welfare Subjectivism, Sophistication, and Procedural Perfectionism
Welfare subjectivists face a dilemma. On the one hand, traditional subjectivist theories—such as the desire-fulfillment theory—are too permissive to account for the well-being of typical mature human beings. On the other hand, more “refined” theories—such as the life-satisfaction theory—are too restrictive to account for the well-being of various welfare subjects, including newborns, those with profound cognitive impairments, or non-human animals…
Disability, Subject‐Dependence, and the Bad‐Difference View
Philosophers have debated on the “mere‐difference” view of disability, according to which disability as such is neutral in terms of well‐being, just like race and gender. It is contrasted with the “bad‐difference” view, which holds that disability is bad for its possessor even in a non‐ableist situation. We first illustrate how neither view can be sensitive to the diversity of disabled people and their disabilities. Subsequently, we propose an al…
Infection control, subjective estimates, and the ethics of testing during the Covid‐19 pandemic
On March 16, 2020, the Director‐General of the World Health Organization said: “We have a simple message to all countries—test, test, test.” This seems like sound advice, but what if limiting the number of tests has a positive effect on infection control? Although this may rarely be the case, the possibility raises an important ethical question that is closely related to a central tension between deontological and consequentialist approaches to e…
What Makes Discrimination Morally Wrong? A Harm‐Based View Reconsidered
What is the morally significant feature of discrimination? All of the following seem plausible – (i) discrimination is a kind of wrongdoing and it wrongs discriminatees, which is a matter of intrapersonal morality; (ii) in view of cases of indirect discrimination, significant normative features of discrimination are best captured in a discriminatee‐focused, or harm‐based , way; and (iii) discrimination, as an act‐type, necessarily involves interp…
No prominent works on this page.
What Makes Discrimination Morally Wrong? A Harm‐Based View Reconsidered
What is the morally significant feature of discrimination? All of the following seem plausible – (i) discrimination is a kind of wrongdoing and it wrongs discriminatees, which is a matter of intrapersonal morality; (ii) in view of cases of indirect discrimination, significant normative features of discrimination are best captured in a discriminatee‐focused, or harm‐based , way; and (iii) discrimination, as an act‐type, necessarily involves interp…
Infection control, subjective estimates, and the ethics of testing during the Covid‐19 pandemic
On March 16, 2020, the Director‐General of the World Health Organization said: “We have a simple message to all countries—test, test, test.” This seems like sound advice, but what if limiting the number of tests has a positive effect on infection control? Although this may rarely be the case, the possibility raises an important ethical question that is closely related to a central tension between deontological and consequentialist approaches to e…
Welfare Subjectivism, Sophistication, and Procedural Perfectionism
Welfare subjectivists face a dilemma. On the one hand, traditional subjectivist theories—such as the desire-fulfillment theory—are too permissive to account for the well-being of typical mature human beings. On the other hand, more “refined” theories—such as the life-satisfaction theory—are too restrictive to account for the well-being of various welfare subjects, including newborns, those with profound cognitive impairments, or non-human animals…
Disability, Subject‐Dependence, and the Bad‐Difference View
Philosophers have debated on the “mere‐difference” view of disability, according to which disability as such is neutral in terms of well‐being, just like race and gender. It is contrasted with the “bad‐difference” view, which holds that disability is bad for its possessor even in a non‐ableist situation. We first illustrate how neither view can be sensitive to the diversity of disabled people and their disabilities. Subsequently, we propose an al…
A comparative analysis of attitudes toward neuroscience and the application of information on the brain between the public and neuroscientists in Japan
Recent technological advancements have expanded our capacity to observe, decode, and modulate human brain activity. As these brain information (BI) technologies evolve, it becomes increasingly important to address relevant ethical, legal, and social issues and to communicate them effectively to the public. However, meaningful dialogue has been hindered by a limited understanding of how attitudes toward BI technologies differ between experts and t…
Multi-species Population Ethics with Critical Levels
This paper explores the notion of species-relative critical levels, which is a crucial ethical issue in multi-species population ethics. First, the formal conditions are provided under which there are species-relative critical levels (e.g., the critical level for human beings is different from that for non-human beings). In particular, we find it a salient question of animal ethics whether the existence of a human being is morally better than tha…
Psychology (5 works) · Social Psychology (4 works) · Epistemology (3 works) · Philosophy (3 works) · Sociology (3 works) · Biology (2 works) · Free Will and Agency (2 works) · Law (2 works) · Medicine (2 works) · Political Philosophy and Ethics (2 works)