Gregory E Kaebnick
Dados Biográficos
| ID | 7102067 |
|---|---|
| NOME | Gregory E Kaebnick |
| PRENOMES | Gregory E |
| SOBRENOME | Kaebnick |
| ASSINATURA | KAEBNICK G E |
| AFILIAÇÕES | Hastings Center |
| VERIFICADO | Não |
| TOTAL DE OBRAS | 80 |
| TOTAL DE CITAÇÕES | 0 |
| TOTAL COMO AUTOR | 80 |
| TOTAL COMO EDITOR | 0 |
| PRIMEIRO ANO DE PUBLICAÇÃO | 1999 |
| ANO MAIS RECENTE DE PUBLICAÇÃO | 2026 |
| ÍNDICE H | 0 |
Hastings Conversations
However helpful have been the papers, reports, and books Erik Parens has produced while at The Hastings Center, conversation with him has always been even better. In both his writing and conversation, he goes to core values. As Erik departs Hastings—retiring as of the end of June 2026 to commit himself more fully to teaching, his original professional love—the loss of these conversational interactions will be felt profoundly, not just at Hastings…
Disclosing generative AI use for writing assistance should be voluntary
Researchers have been using generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) to support writing manuscripts for several years now. However, as GenAI evolves and scientists are using it more frequently, the case for mandatory disclosure of GenAI for writing assistance continues to diverge from the initial justifications for disclosure, namely (1) preventing researchers from taking credit for work done by machines; (2) enabling other researchers to criti…
Neuroscience and Society
Advancing neuroscience is one of many topics that pose a challenge often called “the alignment problem”—the challenge, that is, of assuring that science policy is responsive to and in some sense squares with the public's values. This issue of the Hastings Center Report launches a series of scholarly essays and articles on the ethical and social issues raised by this vast body of medical research and bench science. The series, which will run under…
A Coeditors' Note
The January‐February 2024 issue of the Hastings Center Report includes two sets of pieces concerning brain health. One is a special report on ethical challenges that emerge at various points in the care of people facing dementia. The other set launches the journal's Neuroscience and Society series. An At Law essay provides a framework for challenging discriminatory practices related to the use of algorithms generated by electronic prescription dr…
Science and Justice
In different ways, the November‐December 2024 issue of the Hastings Center Report contests the view that science is a value‐free endeavor to understand the world. The lead article argues that, while most science is commendable, some is inherently “abhorrent,” as it is both harmful and devoid of value. Contemporary “race science”—the work of a “new wave of race researchers” who use “questionable scientific techniques to investigate alarming hypoth…
Editors' statement on the responsible use of generative artificial intelligence technologies in scholarly journal publishing
The new generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools, and especially the large language models (LLMs) of which ChatGPT is the most prominent example, have the potential to transform many aspects of scholarly publishing. How the transformations will play out remains to be seen, both because the different parties involved in the production and publication of scholarly work are still learning about these tools and because the tools themselves are s…
Dependence
The Hastings Center Report's September‐October 2023 issue is about relying on others—on loved ones, clinicians, scientists, and institutions. The lead article explores how loving relationships support and reshape the agency of people who have dementia. Authors Eran Klein and Sara Goering argue that the understanding of agency as a shared, relational capacity has implications for the development of treatments for dementia, the role of caregivers, …
Editors’ Statement on the Responsible Use of Generative AI Technologies in Scholarly Journal Publishing
Generative artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to transform many aspects of scholarly publishing. Authors, peer reviewers, and editors might use AI in a variety of ways, and those uses might augment their existing work or might instead be intended to replace it. We are editors of bioethics and humanities journals who have been contemplating the implications of this ongoing transformation. We believe that generative AI may pose a threat…
Shared Problems
Several pieces in the November‐December 2023 issue of the Hastings Center Report contribute to developing an expansive vision of bioethics. In the lead article, Sean Valles calls on the field to work against the problem of mass incarceration in the United States not only by addressing “what happens to people once they are inside prisons” but also with respect to the “ripple effects” the system has on health and well‐being in surrounding communiti…
Expanding Boundaries
In this, the May‐June 2023, issue of the Hastings Center Report , articles and short pieces explore ethical issues found in the field of bioethics’ expanding boundaries and issues involving people who have been pushed to society's boundaries. In the lead article, Valerie Moyer, Amanda Zink, and Brendan Parent argue for allowing transgender kids to compete on sports teams that accord with their gender identity. Theodore Schall and Jacob Moses take…
Deception and Distress
In the lead article in the January‐February 2023 issue of the Hastings Center Report, Abram Brummett and Erica Salter provide a conceptual framework to help physicians think through the ethics of deceiving a patient or someone closely connected to the patient. Brummett and Salter identify four main ethical features of any act of clinical deception and elaborate on how, in a given case, these features together influence the degree to which a decep…
Trust in Health Care and Science
This essay summarizes key insights across the essays in the Hastings Center Report's special report “Time to Rebuild: Essays on Trust in Health Care and Science.” These insights concern trust and trustworthiness as distinct concepts, competence as a necessary but not sufficient input to trust, trust as a reciprocal good, trust as an interpersonal as well as structural phenomena, the ethical impermissibility of seeking to win trust without being t…
Editors' statement on the responsible use of generative artificial intelligence technologies in scholarly journal publishing
The new generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools, and especially the large language models (LLMs) of which ChatGPT is the most prominent example, have the potential to transform many aspects of scholarly publishing. How the transformations will play out remains to be seen, both because the different parties involved in the production and publication of scholarly work are still learning about these tools and because the tools themselves are s…
Learning Health Systems, Informed Consent, and Respect for Persons
Several pieces in the Hastings Center Report' s May‐June 2022 issue concern research ethics issues that arise in learning health care systems. In the lead article, Stephanie Morain and colleagues propose a new ethical framework for pragmatic clinical trials (PCTs), which are trials embedded in clinical care. Their framework consists of eight dimensions of demonstrating respect for patients enrolled in PCTs. In the second article, Robert Steel arg…
Choosing to Die
Two articles in the September–October 2022 issue of the Hastings Center Report discuss health‐related reasons that people might have to actively bring their lives to an end. In one, Brent Kious considers the situation of a person who, because of illness, becomes a burden on loved ones. A person in such a situation might prefer to die, and Kious argues that, while there is no obligation to hasten one's death, the choice to do so could sometimes be…
Ethics and Structure
In the Hastings Center Report’s March‐April 2022 issue, Diana Anderson, an architect and physician, and her colleagues examine ways in which aspects of the physical design of health care facilities can function as health interventions. The authors identify the kinds of ethical questions such interventions raise, and they offer recommendations for protecting patients and promoting good and fair patient outcomes. A second article focuses on how cli…
Heart and Soul
The lead article in this January‐February 2021 issue—the first of the Hastings Center Report 's fiftieth year of publication—does not set out to change medicine. It tries instead to understand it. In “A Heart without Life: Artificial Organs and the Lived Body,” Mary Jean Walker draws on work in phenomenology and on empirical research with people who have received artificial heart devices to argue that such devices may have two very different effe…
Justice, Bioethics, and Covid‐19
Both articles in the November‐December 2021 issue of the Hastings Center Report reflect bioethics’ growing interest in questions of justice, or more generally, questions of how collective interests constrain individual interests. Hugh Desmond argues that human enhancement should be reconsidered in light of developments in the field of human evolution. Contemporary understandings in this area lead, he argues, to a new way of thinking about the eth…
Variations on Consent
Two articles in the March‐April 2021 issue of the Hastings Center Report consider alterations to traditional informed consent. In “The Consent Continuum: A New Model of Consent, Assent, and Nondissent for Primary Care,” Marc Tunzi and colleagues argue that, in primary care settings, patient consent should be understood as taking a range of forms depending on the procedure, the patient, and the patient‐care context. Traditional informed consent is…
Civic Learning When the Facts Are Politicized
Social debates about highly technical topics are often driven by values yet dwell on facts. The debate about whether genetically modified organisms are acceptable in food, for example, focuses on causal claims about consumers’ health or the environment, but the language and imagery surrounding it often point to underlying misgivings about the human relationship to nature or the use of science. In such cases, it is not always possible to resolve t…
Recommendations for Better Civic Learning
This is the concluding essay for a special report from The Hastings Center entitled Democracy in Crisis: Civic Learning and the Reconstruction of Common Purpose , which grew out of a project supported by the John S. and James L. Knight Foundation. This essay provides an integrative discussion of various theoretical and practical reform perspectives offered by other essays in the report. It also offers a number of recommendations. It notes that th…
The Crisis in Standards of Care
Since the start of the Covid‐19 pandemic, debates have waged about “crisis standards of care” (“CSC”)—the guidelines for the allocation of resources if those resources are too scarce to meet the needs of all patients. The Hastings Center Report's September‐October 2021 issue features a collection of pieces on this debate. In the lead article, MaryKatherine Gaurke and colleagues object to the idea that the allocation of scarce resources should aim…
Does Gene Editing in the Wild Require Broad Public Deliberation
How strong is the argument for requiring public deliberation by very large publics—at national or even global levels—before moving forward with efforts to use gene editing on wild populations of plants or animals? Should there be a general moratorium on any such efforts until such broad public deliberation has been successfully carried out? This article works toward recommendations about the need for and general framing of broad public deliberati…
Civic Learning for a Democracy in Crisis
This essay introduces a special report from The Hastings Center entitled Democracy in Crisis: Civic Learning and the Reconstruction of Common Purpose , which grew out of a project supported by the John S. and James L. Knight Foundation. This multiauthored report offers wide‐ranging assessments of increasing polarization and partisanship in American government and politics, and it proposes constructive responses to this in the provision of objecti…
Ethicists and Activists
In some sense, argues Christopher Meyers in the lead article in this, the July‐August 2021, issue of the Hastings Center Report, to be a good ethicist is to be an activist. The question for the ethicist, and for Meyers, is about how hard and far to push: how much personal risk to shoulder, how much to tick off colleagues, how much institutional disruption to create, how much to look like an angry protester. Meyers argues for aiming at the middle,…
Sem obras proeminentes nesta página.
Particularist Moral Reasoning and Consistency in Moral Judgments
On the Sanctity of Nature
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3527882
The Nature of the Problem
review of Our Posthuman Future: Consequences of the Biotechnology Revolution, by Francis Fukuyama
The Ideal of Nature
Of Microbes and Men
The ACA Decision
The Affordable Care Act survived the Supreme Court—but “just barely”—according to Mark Hall, a contributor to the Report's At Law column. That “just barely” leaves much to ponder, and in this issue a special installment of At Law, appearing as a set of essays, looks into it
Toward a Wider Index
We all know that Hastings likes enhancement.” So said Ruth Macklin at last year's meeting of the American Society for Bioethics and Humanities, in a talk about the evolution of bioethics and on the occasion of receiving ASBH's Lifetime Achievement Award. Professor Macklin had chosen to use the Report's annual subject index as a way of gaining some insight into the topics that have been front and center in bioethics at various times. Several artic…
The Report and Wiley‐Blackwell
This issue marks the beginning of a new publishing venture for The Hastings Center. After forty‐plus years of publishing the Hastings Center Report independently, the Center has decided to collaborate with Wiley‐Blackwell to get the Report out into the world. Hastings retains ownership and full editorial and artistic control; we will put the Report together just as we have always done. But for all of the things that I think of as going under the …
Too Sick
This issue of the Report is bookended by two pieces that take contrasting although perhaps compatible positions on medical care for those in dire straits. At the end of the issue is an article that considers whether patients may be denied admission to intensive care units on grounds that they are too sick to benefit. We think of ICUs as reserved for the sickest of the sick, notes author Andrew Courtwright, but in fact, “too sick to benefit” is an…
Two Dreams
Two disputes are waged simultaneously in the pages of this issue of the Report, but it might be easy to lose track of the second. The obvious dispute is about resource allocation in health policy: the question is whether limited health care resources should be spent on identified victims—people whose struggles with disease have made the news—when the same investment might provide more help if spent on a larger number of unknown, merely “statistic…
Writing on the Margins
When a set of articles or essays in the Report revolves around some common theme, we have planned it that way only about half the time. With this issue, I realized halfway through its assembly that we would have two pieces on what one of the articles calls “the woman question.” Quite late in production, I realized that these two pieces were themselves part of a broader theme: several of the columns also address the health care of people who are s…
Battles over the Sexes
Several themes in this issue of the Hastings Center Report deserve mention. Entirely fortuitously, several shorter pieces in this issue discuss the nature of the doctor‐patient relationship and the need for physicians to engage patients personally rather than only technically. Also, a special supplement to this issue addresses the shifting terrain of the debate about the use of animals in medical research. Perhaps the most prominent topic in the …
Exchanges on Obesity and Smoking
The January‐February issue of the Report introduced a number of new features designed to provide opportunities for further give‐and‐take in our pages. In this issue, we put to use our revamped letters to the editor, Exchange, with a set of commentaries on another of the January‐February articles, Daniel Callahan's “Obesity: Chasing an Elusive Epidemic.” Commentaries in Other Voices and special reports are planned and solicited, in consultation wi…
Roles and Relationships
One of the foundational thoughts in bioethics is that professional roles can generate special ethical obligations. Bioethics first emerged as an effort to understand the special ethical obligations of physicians and researchers. But bioethics now finds itself subject to a converse thought. Bioethicists engaged in clinical ethics consultations-discussing patient care and decision-making with physicians and others-have a special ethical obligation …
A Win‐Win
There is widespread agreement that medical care offered at the end of a life ought to accord with the preferences of the person whose life it is, at least if the care requested would not be futile. There is considerable evidence, too, that making care more “patient‐centered” in this way would tend to lower the cost of care, for the simple reason that people in those straits often prefer to avoid the most intrusive and therefore most expensive car…
New Report Features
We introduce several new editorial developments in this issue aimed at increasing the conversational give‐and‐take that appears in our pages. First, we are moving our editorial, Another Voice, to a spot following the article it addresses, which allows us to experiment with it a bit, letting it run longer and soliciting multiple editorials–“Other Voices.” Second, our letters section has been rebranded “Exchange” to acknowledge the short essay sect…
New Life to the Debate about Death
This issue of the Report is far ranging, with essays on the nature of the U.S. government's responsibility toward Indian tribes, a medical school's commitment toward applicants who are immigrants, the difficulty of developing a transparent national registry of clinical trials, and the ethical problems embedded in the topic of global health. Two items in the issue revolve around physicians’ role in upholding the value placed on reproduction. Anoth…
How Can We Best Think about an Emerging Technology
How should we think about synthetic biology—about the potential benefits and risks of these applications as well as the very idea of designed, extensively genetically modified organisms? The lead article in this report sets out our thinking, but the article is rounded out with nine commentaries that sometimes expand on and sometimes argue with our perspective. Jonathan Wolff, a philosopher at the University College of London and a member of the …
Thinking about Thinking
The lead article in this issue of the Report proposes an innovative explanation for why the subjects of medical research often seem to have great difficulty accurately gauging whether the research will be medically beneficial for them. The first commentary lauds the paper and examines its implications in greater detail; the second lauds the effort to rethink subjects' capacities for assessing the therapeutic benefit of research but raises questio…
Rules, Regs, and What's Right
Several items in this issue of the Hastings Center Report try to fill gaps or resolve uncertainties in the regulatory systems that govern research on human subjects. The biggest of these items is a special report, published as a supplement to the issue, that considers a long-running and vexing regulatory problem: the uncertain relationship between the two sets of federal regulations for research. The goal of the report is to provide guidance.The …
The Ethics of Synthetic Biology
A majority opinion seems to have emerged in scholarly analysis of the assortment of technologies that have been given the label “synthetic biology.” According to this view, society should allow the technology to proceed and even provide it some financial support, while monitoring its progress and attempting to ensure that the development leads to good outcomes. The near‐consensus is captured by the U.S. Presidential Commission for the Study of B…
Learning about Teaching
There are three broad themes in this issue of the Hastings Center Report. First, a special report published as a supplement to the issue addresses the medical and health policy issues faced by lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender patients. Inside the issue, the two articles take up questions about how caregivers may justify a refusal to provide a medical service that a patient has requested. The issue also contains a set of essays that have em…
Looking at It Wrong
Two articles in this issue of the Hastings Center Report push the boundaries of bioethics, but in radically different directions. The lead article offers a new understanding of clinical translation—the process, that is, of generating clinical tools from the theoretical understanding of disease developed in the laboratory. The topic is important because, as Kimmelman and London point out, clinical translation is widely held to be in trouble. In ge…
The Mechanics of Morality
Moral philosophy has its version of physics’ search for a unified theory. Physicists have often thought it unseemly that the four fundamental forces governing how particles interact with each other cannot be reduced to one. Moral philosophers have often tried to unify the fundamental values governing how moral agents interact with each other. Bioethicists have mostly given up on complete unification and settled for drawing on multiple fundamental…
Neural Devices
Good ethics start with good facts, as Tom Murray, past president of Hastings, often said when he was here, and that alone might be enough to declare that fields like genetic science and synthetic biology warrant their own subfields of ethics—“genethics” and “synthethics.” Perhaps getting clear on how genetic science might be used to improve human health requires such deep immersion in the genetic science that those studying the science's ethical …
Political science (58 obras) · Law (54 obras) · Sociology (50 obras) · Psychology (41 obras) · Ethics in medical practice (31 obras) · Computer Science (29 obras) · Bioethics (28 obras) · Medicine (26 obras) · Philosophy (23 obras) · Public relations (21 obras)