Sam Guy
Biographic Data
| ID | 7103835 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Sam Guy |
| GIVEN NAMES | Sam |
| FAMILY NAME | Guy |
| SIGNATURE | GUY S |
| AFFILIATIONS | Environmental Law Institute |
| ORCID | 0000-0003-0119-222X |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 2 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 0 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 2 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2022 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2026 |
| H-INDEX | 0 |
The Aarhus environmental costs protection regime, judicial review reform, and the Fingleton Nuclear Regulatory Review
The Nuclear Regulatory Review represents a significant milestone in the critique that judicial review contributes to sclerosis in the delivery of infrastructure. This analysis piece sets out and contextualises the theory of judicial review it adopts, which resonates with a strand of thinking I have elsewhere termed ‘litigant power’. It engages with the Review's proposed solutions to the challenge of judicial review in the nuclear sector, suggesti…
Mobilising the Market: An Empirical Analysis of Crowdfunding for Judicial Review Litigation
This article provides an analysis of 413 crowdfunding campaigns raising funds for judicial review cases. In doing so, it empirically captures the judicial review crowdfunding landscape for the first time, drawing attention to the divergent rates of funding and generating a profile of the actors using the resource based on their geographic scope and their litigation experience. Noting the proliferation of campaigns seeking social goals beyond the …
No prominent works on this page.
Mobilising the Market: An Empirical Analysis of Crowdfunding for Judicial Review Litigation
This article provides an analysis of 413 crowdfunding campaigns raising funds for judicial review cases. In doing so, it empirically captures the judicial review crowdfunding landscape for the first time, drawing attention to the divergent rates of funding and generating a profile of the actors using the resource based on their geographic scope and their litigation experience. Noting the proliferation of campaigns seeking social goals beyond the …
The Aarhus environmental costs protection regime, judicial review reform, and the Fingleton Nuclear Regulatory Review
The Nuclear Regulatory Review represents a significant milestone in the critique that judicial review contributes to sclerosis in the delivery of infrastructure. This analysis piece sets out and contextualises the theory of judicial review it adopts, which resonates with a strand of thinking I have elsewhere termed ‘litigant power’. It engages with the Review's proposed solutions to the challenge of judicial review in the nuclear sector, suggesti…
Business (1 works) · Community Development and Social Impact (1 works) · Economics (1 works) · Engineering (1 works) · Environmental law and policy (1 works) · FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance (1 works) · International Environmental Law and Policies (1 works) · Judicial opinion (1 works) · Judicial review (1 works) · Law (1 works)