Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

William D Brant

Biographic Data

ID7117013
NAMEWilliam D Brant
GIVEN NAMESWilliam D
FAMILY NAMEBrant
SIGNATUREBRANT W D
AFFILIATIONSOregon State University
VERIFIEDNo
TOTAL WORKS4
TOTAL CITATIONS0
WORKS AS AUTHOR4
WORKS AS EDITOR0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR1978
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR1980
H-INDEX0
  • Authoritarian Traits as Predictors of Preference for Candidates in 1980 United States Presidential Election

    Open Access•William D Brant, Alfonso R Batres et al.•ARTICLE•Psychological Reports•1980

    Responses of 42 males and 42 females to a questionnaire containing items from the dogmatism and F scales showed the right-wing candidate supporters were higher on authoritarianism than adherents of either moderate Republicans or President Carter; left-wing liberal candidate supporters were lowest. Data support the findings of previous research, attest to the reliability and validity of both the D scale and F scale, are consistent with the content…

  • Attitudes toward Female Professors Scale

    Open Access•William D Brant•ARTICLE•Psychological Reports•1979

    Recently development of a Likert-type scale measuring attitudes coward women university professors was described (I), including data on reliability, validity, scale development, and individual differences. To facilitate research with this device, the items and their part-whole correlations are presented below. The items are administered utilizing the usual five response choices: 1 = Disagree Strongly, 2 = Disagree, 3 = No Opinion, 4 = Agree, 5 = …

  • Attitudes toward Female Professors

    Open Access•William D Brant•ARTICLE•Psychological Reports•1978

    The literature shows that there are no instruments available which measure specific or localized aspects of sexism, e.g., in the professions. As available scales measure sexism in general, that is, general attitudes toward women and women's rights, a Likert-type scale was developed to measure attitudes toward women as university professors. The split-half reliability coefficient is 0.88. The test-retest reliability coefficient determined over a 5…

  • Authoritarian Traits as Predictors of Candidate Preference in 1976 United States Presidential Election

    Open Access•William D Brant, Knud S Larsen et al.•ARTICLE•Psychological Reports•1978

    Responses of 39 males and 41 females to a questionnaire containing items from the dogmatism and F scales showed Wallace/Reagan supporters were higher on authoritarianism than Ford/Carter adherents and left-liberal supporters were lowest. Data do not support Rokeach's theory

No prominent works on this page.

  • Attitudes toward Female Professors

    Open Access•William D Brant•ARTICLE•Psychological Reports•1978

    The literature shows that there are no instruments available which measure specific or localized aspects of sexism, e.g., in the professions. As available scales measure sexism in general, that is, general attitudes toward women and women's rights, a Likert-type scale was developed to measure attitudes toward women as university professors. The split-half reliability coefficient is 0.88. The test-retest reliability coefficient determined over a 5…

  • Authoritarian Traits as Predictors of Candidate Preference in 1976 United States Presidential Election

    Open Access•William D Brant, Knud S Larsen et al.•ARTICLE•Psychological Reports•1978

    Responses of 39 males and 41 females to a questionnaire containing items from the dogmatism and F scales showed Wallace/Reagan supporters were higher on authoritarianism than Ford/Carter adherents and left-liberal supporters were lowest. Data do not support Rokeach's theory

  • Attitudes toward Female Professors Scale

    Open Access•William D Brant•ARTICLE•Psychological Reports•1979

    Recently development of a Likert-type scale measuring attitudes coward women university professors was described (I), including data on reliability, validity, scale development, and individual differences. To facilitate research with this device, the items and their part-whole correlations are presented below. The items are administered utilizing the usual five response choices: 1 = Disagree Strongly, 2 = Disagree, 3 = No Opinion, 4 = Agree, 5 = …

  • Authoritarian Traits as Predictors of Preference for Candidates in 1980 United States Presidential Election

    Open Access•William D Brant, Alfonso R Batres et al.•ARTICLE•Psychological Reports•1980

    Responses of 42 males and 42 females to a questionnaire containing items from the dogmatism and F scales showed the right-wing candidate supporters were higher on authoritarianism than adherents of either moderate Republicans or President Carter; left-wing liberal candidate supporters were lowest. Data support the findings of previous research, attest to the reliability and validity of both the D scale and F scale, are consistent with the content…

Psychology (4 works) · Social Psychology (4 works) · Social Psychology (4 works) · Authoritarianism (3 works) · Scale (ratio (3 works) · Clinical Psychology (2 works) · Clinical Psychology (2 works) · Democracy (2 works) · Geography (2 works) · Law (2 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae