Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Peter Kurrild‐klitgaard

Biographic Data

ID715767
NAMEPeter Kurrild‐klitgaard
GIVEN NAMESPeter
FAMILY NAMEKurrild‐klitgaard
SIGNATUREKLITGAARD P K
AFFILIATIONSUniversity of Copenhagen
ORCID0000-0002-5897-361X
VERIFIEDYes
TOTAL WORKS19
TOTAL CITATIONS137
AUTHOR COUNT19
EDITOR COUNT0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR2000
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2024
H-INDEX7
  • Size isn’t everything: Covid-19 and the role of government

    Open Access•Peter Kurrild‐klitgaard•ARTICLE•Public Choice•2024•Cited by: 1•References: 28

  • The calculus of democratic deliberation

    Open Access•Peter Kurrild‐klitgaard, Urs Steiner Brandt•ARTICLE•Constitutional Political Economy•2021•Cited by: 1•References: 22

  • Public choice and political science: A view from Europe

    Open Access•Peter Kurrild‐klitgaard, Peter Kurrild-Klitgaard•ARTICLE•Public Choice•2018•Cited by: 1•References: 16

  • Computers, coders, and voters: Comparing automated methods for estimating party positions

    Open Access•Frederik Hjorth, Robert Klemmensen et al.•ARTICLE•Research & Politics•2015•Cited by: 12•References: 18

    Assigning political actors positions in ideological space is a task of key importance to political scientists. In this paper we compare estimates obtained using the automated Wordscores and Wordfish techniques, along with estimates from voters and the Comparative Manifesto Project (CMP), against expert placements. We estimate the positions of 254 manifestos across 33 elections in Germany and Denmark, two cases with very different textual data ava…

  • Economic Growth and Institutional Reform in Modern Monarchies and Republics: A Historical Cross-Country Perspective 1820-2000

    Christian Bjørnskov, Peter Kurrild‐klitgaard et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Institutional and…•2014

    Conventional arguments suggest that republics ought to grow faster than monarchies and experience lower transitional costs following reforms. We employ a panel of 27 countries observed from 1820 to 2000 to estimate these differences. Results show no significant growth differences between the two regime types. Effects of incremental reforms do not differ between them, but those of large-scale reforms do. Specifically, we find a strong valley-of-te…

  • Picking a loser? A social choice perspective on the Danish government formation of 1975

    Open Access•Peter Kurrild‐klitgaard, Peter Kurrild-Klitgaard•ARTICLE•Public Choice•2014•References: 8

  • Empirical social choice: An introduction

    Open Access•Peter Kurrild‐klitgaard, Peter Kurrild-Klitgaard•ARTICLE•Public Choice•2014•References: 45

  • It’s the weather, stupid! Individual participation in collective May Day demonstrations

    Open Access•Peter Kurrild‐klitgaard, Peter Kurrild-Klitgaard•ARTICLE•Public Choice•2013•Cited by: 4•References: 15

  • Public choice, political economy and development: An introduction to the life, times and themes of Martin Paldam

    Open Access•Toke S Aidt, Toke Aidt et al.•ARTICLE•Public Choice•2013•Cited by: 1•References: 24

  • Institutional interactions and economic growth: The joint effects of property rights, veto players and democratic capital

    Open Access•Mogens Kamp Justesen, Peter Kurrild‐klitgaard et al.•ARTICLE•Public Choice•2013•Cited by: 4•References: 64

  • Election Inversions, Coalitions and Proportional Representation: Examples of Voting Paradoxes in Danish Government Formations

    Open Access•Peter Kurrild‐klitgaard•ARTICLE•Scandinavian Political Studies•2013•Cited by: 7•References: 30

    When collective choices are made in more than one round and with different groups of decision makers, so‐called ‘election inversions’ may take place, where each round produces different majority outcomes. In this article, two versions of such compound majority paradoxes are identified that are particularly, but not exclusively, relevant for systems of proportional representation with governing coalitions: the ‘Threshold Paradox’ and the ‘Federal …

  • Modeling constitutional choice: Reflections on The Calculus of Consent 50 years on

    Open Access•Peter Kurrild‐klitgaard, Peter Kurrild-Klitgaard•ARTICLE•Public Choice•2012•References: 24

  • Voting Paradoxes under Proportional Representation: Evidence from Eight Danish Elections

    Open Access•Peter Kurrild‐klitgaard•ARTICLE•Scandinavian Political Studies•2008•Cited by: 12•References: 19

    Voter preferences for eight general elections for the Danish parliament are analysed using survey data to investigate the possible presence of five types of social choice paradoxes that may occur in list systems of proportional representation. Two serious paradoxes fail to manifest themselves, while three others occur with different frequencies. One paradox always occurs – namely, for the social ordering of political parties based on pair‐wise co…

  • The political economy of freedom, democracy and transnational terrorism

    Open Access•Peter Kurrild‐klitgaard, Peter Kurrild-Klitgaard et al.•ARTICLE•Public Choice•2006•Cited by: 35•References: 20

  • Blood, Baath and Beyond: The Constitutional Dilemma of Iraq

    Open Access•Peter Kurrild‐klitgaard, Peter Kurrild-Klitgaard•ARTICLE•Public Choice•2004•Cited by: 2•References: 9

  • Rational Bandits: Plunder, Public Goods, and the Vikings

    Open Access•Peter Kurrild‐klitgaard, Peter Kurrild-Klitgaard et al.•ARTICLE•Public Choice•2003•Cited by: 12•References: 15

  • Opting-Out: The Constitutional Economics of Exit

    Open Access•Peter Kurrild‐klitgaard•ARTICLE•American Journal of Economics and…•2002•Cited by: 8

    The central aspect, which makes markets operate differently than governments, is the ability of market actors to "exit" from future interactions. This point is applied to constitutional analysis, with an emphasis on the constitutional possibility of individuals or groups in a society "exiting," wholly or partly, from the political community or from specific institutions within such. Hobbesian and Lockean states-of-nature are sketched using a comm…

  • An Empirical Example of the Condorcet Paradox of Voting in a Large Electorate

    Open Access•Peter Kurrild‐klitgaard•ARTICLE•Public Choice•2001•Cited by: 11•References: 26

  • The Constitutional Economics of Autocratic Succession

    Open Access•Peter Kurrild‐klitgaard, Peter Kurrild-Klitgaard•ARTICLE•Public Choice•2000•Cited by: 26•References: 7

  • The political economy of freedom, democracy and transnational terrorism

    Open Access•Peter Kurrild‐klitgaard, Peter Kurrild-Klitgaard et al.•ARTICLE•Public Choice•2006•Cited by: 35•References: 20

  • The Constitutional Economics of Autocratic Succession

    Open Access•Peter Kurrild‐klitgaard, Peter Kurrild-Klitgaard•ARTICLE•Public Choice•2000•Cited by: 26•References: 7

  • Computers, coders, and voters: Comparing automated methods for estimating party positions

    Open Access•Frederik Hjorth, Robert Klemmensen et al.•ARTICLE•Research & Politics•2015•Cited by: 12•References: 18

    Assigning political actors positions in ideological space is a task of key importance to political scientists. In this paper we compare estimates obtained using the automated Wordscores and Wordfish techniques, along with estimates from voters and the Comparative Manifesto Project (CMP), against expert placements. We estimate the positions of 254 manifestos across 33 elections in Germany and Denmark, two cases with very different textual data ava…

  • Voting Paradoxes under Proportional Representation: Evidence from Eight Danish Elections

    Open Access•Peter Kurrild‐klitgaard•ARTICLE•Scandinavian Political Studies•2008•Cited by: 12•References: 19

    Voter preferences for eight general elections for the Danish parliament are analysed using survey data to investigate the possible presence of five types of social choice paradoxes that may occur in list systems of proportional representation. Two serious paradoxes fail to manifest themselves, while three others occur with different frequencies. One paradox always occurs – namely, for the social ordering of political parties based on pair‐wise co…

  • Rational Bandits: Plunder, Public Goods, and the Vikings

    Open Access•Peter Kurrild‐klitgaard, Peter Kurrild-Klitgaard et al.•ARTICLE•Public Choice•2003•Cited by: 12•References: 15

  • An Empirical Example of the Condorcet Paradox of Voting in a Large Electorate

    Open Access•Peter Kurrild‐klitgaard•ARTICLE•Public Choice•2001•Cited by: 11•References: 26

  • Opting-Out: The Constitutional Economics of Exit

    Open Access•Peter Kurrild‐klitgaard•ARTICLE•American Journal of Economics and…•2002•Cited by: 8

    The central aspect, which makes markets operate differently than governments, is the ability of market actors to "exit" from future interactions. This point is applied to constitutional analysis, with an emphasis on the constitutional possibility of individuals or groups in a society "exiting," wholly or partly, from the political community or from specific institutions within such. Hobbesian and Lockean states-of-nature are sketched using a comm…

  • Election Inversions, Coalitions and Proportional Representation: Examples of Voting Paradoxes in Danish Government Formations

    Open Access•Peter Kurrild‐klitgaard•ARTICLE•Scandinavian Political Studies•2013•Cited by: 7•References: 30

    When collective choices are made in more than one round and with different groups of decision makers, so‐called ‘election inversions’ may take place, where each round produces different majority outcomes. In this article, two versions of such compound majority paradoxes are identified that are particularly, but not exclusively, relevant for systems of proportional representation with governing coalitions: the ‘Threshold Paradox’ and the ‘Federal …

  • It’s the weather, stupid! Individual participation in collective May Day demonstrations

    Open Access•Peter Kurrild‐klitgaard, Peter Kurrild-Klitgaard•ARTICLE•Public Choice•2013•Cited by: 4•References: 15

  • Institutional interactions and economic growth: The joint effects of property rights, veto players and democratic capital

    Open Access•Mogens Kamp Justesen, Peter Kurrild‐klitgaard et al.•ARTICLE•Public Choice•2013•Cited by: 4•References: 64

  • Blood, Baath and Beyond: The Constitutional Dilemma of Iraq

    Open Access•Peter Kurrild‐klitgaard, Peter Kurrild-Klitgaard•ARTICLE•Public Choice•2004•Cited by: 2•References: 9

  • Size isn’t everything: Covid-19 and the role of government

    Open Access•Peter Kurrild‐klitgaard•ARTICLE•Public Choice•2024•Cited by: 1•References: 28

  • The calculus of democratic deliberation

    Open Access•Peter Kurrild‐klitgaard, Urs Steiner Brandt•ARTICLE•Constitutional Political Economy•2021•Cited by: 1•References: 22

  • Public choice and political science: A view from Europe

    Open Access•Peter Kurrild‐klitgaard, Peter Kurrild-Klitgaard•ARTICLE•Public Choice•2018•Cited by: 1•References: 16

  • Public choice, political economy and development: An introduction to the life, times and themes of Martin Paldam

    Open Access•Toke S Aidt, Toke Aidt et al.•ARTICLE•Public Choice•2013•Cited by: 1•References: 24

  • The Constitutional Economics of Autocratic Succession

    Open Access•Peter Kurrild‐klitgaard, Peter Kurrild-Klitgaard•ARTICLE•Public Choice•2000•Cited by: 26•References: 7

  • An Empirical Example of the Condorcet Paradox of Voting in a Large Electorate

    Open Access•Peter Kurrild‐klitgaard•ARTICLE•Public Choice•2001•Cited by: 11•References: 26

  • Opting-Out: The Constitutional Economics of Exit

    Open Access•Peter Kurrild‐klitgaard•ARTICLE•American Journal of Economics and…•2002•Cited by: 8

    The central aspect, which makes markets operate differently than governments, is the ability of market actors to "exit" from future interactions. This point is applied to constitutional analysis, with an emphasis on the constitutional possibility of individuals or groups in a society "exiting," wholly or partly, from the political community or from specific institutions within such. Hobbesian and Lockean states-of-nature are sketched using a comm…

  • Rational Bandits: Plunder, Public Goods, and the Vikings

    Open Access•Peter Kurrild‐klitgaard, Peter Kurrild-Klitgaard et al.•ARTICLE•Public Choice•2003•Cited by: 12•References: 15

  • Blood, Baath and Beyond: The Constitutional Dilemma of Iraq

    Open Access•Peter Kurrild‐klitgaard, Peter Kurrild-Klitgaard•ARTICLE•Public Choice•2004•Cited by: 2•References: 9

  • The political economy of freedom, democracy and transnational terrorism

    Open Access•Peter Kurrild‐klitgaard, Peter Kurrild-Klitgaard et al.•ARTICLE•Public Choice•2006•Cited by: 35•References: 20

  • Voting Paradoxes under Proportional Representation: Evidence from Eight Danish Elections

    Open Access•Peter Kurrild‐klitgaard•ARTICLE•Scandinavian Political Studies•2008•Cited by: 12•References: 19

    Voter preferences for eight general elections for the Danish parliament are analysed using survey data to investigate the possible presence of five types of social choice paradoxes that may occur in list systems of proportional representation. Two serious paradoxes fail to manifest themselves, while three others occur with different frequencies. One paradox always occurs – namely, for the social ordering of political parties based on pair‐wise co…

  • Modeling constitutional choice: Reflections on The Calculus of Consent 50 years on

    Open Access•Peter Kurrild‐klitgaard, Peter Kurrild-Klitgaard•ARTICLE•Public Choice•2012•References: 24

  • It’s the weather, stupid! Individual participation in collective May Day demonstrations

    Open Access•Peter Kurrild‐klitgaard, Peter Kurrild-Klitgaard•ARTICLE•Public Choice•2013•Cited by: 4•References: 15

  • Public choice, political economy and development: An introduction to the life, times and themes of Martin Paldam

    Open Access•Toke S Aidt, Toke Aidt et al.•ARTICLE•Public Choice•2013•Cited by: 1•References: 24

  • Institutional interactions and economic growth: The joint effects of property rights, veto players and democratic capital

    Open Access•Mogens Kamp Justesen, Peter Kurrild‐klitgaard et al.•ARTICLE•Public Choice•2013•Cited by: 4•References: 64

  • Election Inversions, Coalitions and Proportional Representation: Examples of Voting Paradoxes in Danish Government Formations

    Open Access•Peter Kurrild‐klitgaard•ARTICLE•Scandinavian Political Studies•2013•Cited by: 7•References: 30

    When collective choices are made in more than one round and with different groups of decision makers, so‐called ‘election inversions’ may take place, where each round produces different majority outcomes. In this article, two versions of such compound majority paradoxes are identified that are particularly, but not exclusively, relevant for systems of proportional representation with governing coalitions: the ‘Threshold Paradox’ and the ‘Federal …

  • Economic Growth and Institutional Reform in Modern Monarchies and Republics: A Historical Cross-Country Perspective 1820-2000

    Christian Bjørnskov, Peter Kurrild‐klitgaard et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Institutional and…•2014

    Conventional arguments suggest that republics ought to grow faster than monarchies and experience lower transitional costs following reforms. We employ a panel of 27 countries observed from 1820 to 2000 to estimate these differences. Results show no significant growth differences between the two regime types. Effects of incremental reforms do not differ between them, but those of large-scale reforms do. Specifically, we find a strong valley-of-te…

  • Picking a loser? A social choice perspective on the Danish government formation of 1975

    Open Access•Peter Kurrild‐klitgaard, Peter Kurrild-Klitgaard•ARTICLE•Public Choice•2014•References: 8

  • Empirical social choice: An introduction

    Open Access•Peter Kurrild‐klitgaard, Peter Kurrild-Klitgaard•ARTICLE•Public Choice•2014•References: 45

  • Computers, coders, and voters: Comparing automated methods for estimating party positions

    Open Access•Frederik Hjorth, Robert Klemmensen et al.•ARTICLE•Research & Politics•2015•Cited by: 12•References: 18

    Assigning political actors positions in ideological space is a task of key importance to political scientists. In this paper we compare estimates obtained using the automated Wordscores and Wordfish techniques, along with estimates from voters and the Comparative Manifesto Project (CMP), against expert placements. We estimate the positions of 254 manifestos across 33 elections in Germany and Denmark, two cases with very different textual data ava…

  • Public choice and political science: A view from Europe

    Open Access•Peter Kurrild‐klitgaard, Peter Kurrild-Klitgaard•ARTICLE•Public Choice•2018•Cited by: 1•References: 16

  • The calculus of democratic deliberation

    Open Access•Peter Kurrild‐klitgaard, Urs Steiner Brandt•ARTICLE•Constitutional Political Economy•2021•Cited by: 1•References: 22

  • Size isn’t everything: Covid-19 and the role of government

    Open Access•Peter Kurrild‐klitgaard•ARTICLE•Public Choice•2024•Cited by: 1•References: 28

Economics (19 works) · Political science (17 works) · Law (15 works) · Politics (14 works) · Public finance (11 works) · Law (10 works) · Electoral Systems and Political Participation (9 works) · Democracy (7 works) · Epistemology (7 works) · Political economy (6 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae