Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Dahae Lee

Biographic Data

ID7238343
NAMEDahae Lee
GIVEN NAMESDahae
FAMILY NAMELee
SIGNATURELEE D
AFFILIATIONSTU Dortmund University
ORCID0000-0003-2897-5718
VERIFIEDYes
TOTAL WORKS6
TOTAL CITATIONS0
WORKS AS AUTHOR6
WORKS AS EDITOR0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR2022
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2026
H-INDEX0
  • From Artistic Strategies to Placemaking and Capability Development

    Open Access•Dahae Lee, Elina Kränzle et al.•ARTICLE•Planning Theory & Practice•2026

    In recent decades, a decline in youth participation has been widely documented. Existing studies identify a lack of trust between youth and professionals as a contributing factor. This paper presents empirical findings from four urban living labs – Vienna, Panevėžys, Oslo, and Rotterdam – where different participatory approaches were tested ranging from artistic strategies to placemaking and capability development. The findings suggest that trust…

  • Co-Production in the Urban Setting

    Open Access•Dahae Lee, Patricia Feiertag et al.•ARTICLE•Urban Planning•2024

    Co-production is a concept which is increasingly popular in the planning field to refer to multi-stakeholder collaboration and partnership with citizens. However, the existing literature suggests that the rapid growth of the concept has resulted in ambiguity about its meaning. Given that the concept has a potential in planning research and practice, the thematic issue aims to present studies that use comparative approaches as a way to sharpen the…

  • Co-production of privately owned public space

    Open Access•Dahae Lee, Nele Scholten•ARTICLE•URBAN DESIGN International•2024

    The term ‘co-production’ has been used in various fields, including planning, as collaborative forms of public goods and service delivery gain significance. Co-production has two sides—the ‘co’ side refers to actors and their motivations, while the ‘production’ side refers to phases and instruments. This paper examines privately owned public space/s (POPS) based on the two sides of co-production. Thereby, it addresses two research gaps. First, le…

  • Co-production, co-creation or co-design of public space? A systematic review

    Open Access•Dahae Lee, Patricia Feiertag et al.•ARTICLE•Cities•2024

  • Do welfare states need privately owned public spaces? The relevance of and need for such spaces in German cities

    Dahae Lee, Nele Scholten•ARTICLE•Journal of Urban Design•2022

    Privately owned public space (POPS) are a new type of public space that was first introduced in New York City in the 1960s. POPS have been thoroughly studied in the Anglo-American world; however, little examination has been conducted in welfare states. This paper examines to what extent this type of space is relevant and needed for German cities where the private sector involvement is limited. Survey findings, document analysis, and in-depth inte…

  • Whose space is privately owned public space? Exclusion, underuse and the lack of knowledge and awareness

    Open Access•Dahae Lee•ARTICLE•Urban Research & Practice•2022

    Privately Owned Public Space/s (POPS) is a mechanism to increase provision of public space, particularly in densely built-up urban areas. The empirical work undertaken along the Teheran-ro in Seoul reveals that even well-equipped and highly accessible POPS can be exclusive or underused. This paper argues that the problem of exclusion and underuse of POPS is related to the lack of knowledge of POPS and of awareness that they are public spaces. The…

No prominent works on this page.

  • Do welfare states need privately owned public spaces? The relevance of and need for such spaces in German cities

    Dahae Lee, Nele Scholten•ARTICLE•Journal of Urban Design•2022

    Privately owned public space (POPS) are a new type of public space that was first introduced in New York City in the 1960s. POPS have been thoroughly studied in the Anglo-American world; however, little examination has been conducted in welfare states. This paper examines to what extent this type of space is relevant and needed for German cities where the private sector involvement is limited. Survey findings, document analysis, and in-depth inte…

  • Whose space is privately owned public space? Exclusion, underuse and the lack of knowledge and awareness

    Open Access•Dahae Lee•ARTICLE•Urban Research & Practice•2022

    Privately Owned Public Space/s (POPS) is a mechanism to increase provision of public space, particularly in densely built-up urban areas. The empirical work undertaken along the Teheran-ro in Seoul reveals that even well-equipped and highly accessible POPS can be exclusive or underused. This paper argues that the problem of exclusion and underuse of POPS is related to the lack of knowledge of POPS and of awareness that they are public spaces. The…

  • Co-Production in the Urban Setting

    Open Access•Dahae Lee, Patricia Feiertag et al.•ARTICLE•Urban Planning•2024

    Co-production is a concept which is increasingly popular in the planning field to refer to multi-stakeholder collaboration and partnership with citizens. However, the existing literature suggests that the rapid growth of the concept has resulted in ambiguity about its meaning. Given that the concept has a potential in planning research and practice, the thematic issue aims to present studies that use comparative approaches as a way to sharpen the…

  • Co-production of privately owned public space

    Open Access•Dahae Lee, Nele Scholten•ARTICLE•URBAN DESIGN International•2024

    The term ‘co-production’ has been used in various fields, including planning, as collaborative forms of public goods and service delivery gain significance. Co-production has two sides—the ‘co’ side refers to actors and their motivations, while the ‘production’ side refers to phases and instruments. This paper examines privately owned public space/s (POPS) based on the two sides of co-production. Thereby, it addresses two research gaps. First, le…

  • Co-production, co-creation or co-design of public space? A systematic review

    Open Access•Dahae Lee, Patricia Feiertag et al.•ARTICLE•Cities•2024

  • From Artistic Strategies to Placemaking and Capability Development

    Open Access•Dahae Lee, Elina Kränzle et al.•ARTICLE•Planning Theory & Practice•2026

    In recent decades, a decline in youth participation has been widely documented. Existing studies identify a lack of trust between youth and professionals as a contributing factor. This paper presents empirical findings from four urban living labs – Vienna, Panevėžys, Oslo, and Rotterdam – where different participatory approaches were tested ranging from artistic strategies to placemaking and capability development. The findings suggest that trust…

Architectural engineering (3 works) · Business (3 works) · Economics (3 works) · Engineering (3 works) · Public space (3 works) · Computer Science (2 works) · Geography (2 works) · Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development (2 works) · Political science (2 works) · Public Policy and Administration Research (2 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae