J Levine

Biographic Data

ID	730738
NAME	J Levine
GIVEN NAMES	J
FAMILY NAME	Levine
SIGNATURE	LEVINE J
AFFILIATIONS	University of British Columbia
ORCID	0000-0002-0534-9231
VERIFIED	Yes
TOTAL WORKS	10
TOTAL CITATIONS	50
AUTHOR COUNT	10
EDITOR COUNT	0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR	1937
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR	2020
H-INDEX	1

Design and impact evaluation of a digital reproductive health program in Rwanda using a cluster randomized design
Open AccessCara Nolan, Laura J Packel et al.ARTICLEBMC Public Health2020
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04198272 . Prospectively registered 13 December 2019
Testing for consensus on Kyrgyz rangelands
Open AccessJ Levine, Aiganysh Isaeva et al.ARTICLEConservation Ecology2019Cited by: 1
Levine, J., A. Isaeva, H. Zerriffi, I. M. S. Eddy, M. Foggin, S. E. Gergel, and S. M. Hagerman. 2019. Testing for consensus on Kyrgyz rangelands: local perceptions in Naryn oblast. Ecology and Society 24(4):36. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-11222-240436
From rational actor to efficient complexity manager
Open AccessJ Levine, Kai M A Chan et al.ARTICLEEcological Economics2015
Theories of the deep
Open AccessJ Levine, Michael Muthukrishna et al.ARTICLEConservation Ecology2015
Levine, J., M. Muthukrishna, K. M. A. Chan, and T. Satterfield. 2015. Theories of the deep: combining salience and network analyses to produce mental model visualizations of a coastal British Columbia food web. Ecology and Society 20(4):42.http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-08094-200442
A social–ecological approach to conservation planning
Open AccessNatalie C Ban, Morena Mills et al.ARTICLEFrontiers in Ecology and the…2013
Many conservation plans remain unimplemented, in part because of insufficient consideration of the social processes that influence conservation decisions. Complementing social considerations with an integrated understanding of the ecology of a region can result in a more complete conservation approach. We suggest that linking conservation planning to a social–ecological systems (SES) framework can lead to a more thorough understanding of human–en…
Humans and Nature
Open AccessRoly Russell, Anne D Guerry et al.ARTICLEAnnual Review of Environment and…2013
Ecosystems provide many of the material building blocks for human well-being. Although quantification and appreciation of such contributions have rapidly grown, our dependence upon cultural connections to nature deserves more attention. We synthesize multidisciplinary peer-reviewed research on contributions of nature or ecosystems to human well-being mediated through nontangible connections (such as culture). We characterize these connections on …
Ecosystem Services and Beyond
Christopher M Raymond, Gerald G Singh et al.ARTICLEBioScience2013
Ecosystem services research has been focused on the ways that humans directly benefit from goods and services, and economic valuation techniques have been used to measure those benefits. We argue that, although it is appropriate in some cases, this focus on direct use and economic quantification is often limiting and can detract from environmental research and effective management, in part by crowding out other understandings of human–environment…
The Challenges of Incorporating Cultural Ecosystem Services into Environmental Assessment
Open AccessDebra Satz, R K Gould et al.ARTICLEAMBIO2013Cited by: 49References: 16
Where are Cultural and Social in Ecosystem Services? A Framework for Constructive Engagement
Kai M A Chan, Anne D Guerry et al.ARTICLEBioScience2012
A focus on ecosystem services (ES) is seen as a means for improving decisionmaking. In the research to date, the valuation of the material contributions of ecosystems to human well-being has been emphasized, with less attention to important cultural ES and nonmaterial values. This gap persists because there is no commonly accepted framework for eliciting less tangible values, characterizing their changes, and including them alongside other servic…
La Mongolie
J LevineARTICLEPacific Affairs1937

La Mongolie
J LevineARTICLEPacific Affairs1937
Where are Cultural and Social in Ecosystem Services? A Framework for Constructive Engagement
Kai M A Chan, Anne D Guerry et al.ARTICLEBioScience2012
A focus on ecosystem services (ES) is seen as a means for improving decisionmaking. In the research to date, the valuation of the material contributions of ecosystems to human well-being has been emphasized, with less attention to important cultural ES and nonmaterial values. This gap persists because there is no commonly accepted framework for eliciting less tangible values, characterizing their changes, and including them alongside other servic…
A social–ecological approach to conservation planning
Open AccessNatalie C Ban, Morena Mills et al.ARTICLEFrontiers in Ecology and the…2013
Many conservation plans remain unimplemented, in part because of insufficient consideration of the social processes that influence conservation decisions. Complementing social considerations with an integrated understanding of the ecology of a region can result in a more complete conservation approach. We suggest that linking conservation planning to a social–ecological systems (SES) framework can lead to a more thorough understanding of human–en…
Humans and Nature
Open AccessRoly Russell, Anne D Guerry et al.ARTICLEAnnual Review of Environment and…2013
Ecosystems provide many of the material building blocks for human well-being. Although quantification and appreciation of such contributions have rapidly grown, our dependence upon cultural connections to nature deserves more attention. We synthesize multidisciplinary peer-reviewed research on contributions of nature or ecosystems to human well-being mediated through nontangible connections (such as culture). We characterize these connections on …
Ecosystem Services and Beyond
Christopher M Raymond, Gerald G Singh et al.ARTICLEBioScience2013
Ecosystem services research has been focused on the ways that humans directly benefit from goods and services, and economic valuation techniques have been used to measure those benefits. We argue that, although it is appropriate in some cases, this focus on direct use and economic quantification is often limiting and can detract from environmental research and effective management, in part by crowding out other understandings of human–environment…
The Challenges of Incorporating Cultural Ecosystem Services into Environmental Assessment
Open AccessDebra Satz, R K Gould et al.ARTICLEAMBIO2013Cited by: 49References: 16
From rational actor to efficient complexity manager
Open AccessJ Levine, Kai M A Chan et al.ARTICLEEcological Economics2015
Theories of the deep
Open AccessJ Levine, Michael Muthukrishna et al.ARTICLEConservation Ecology2015
Levine, J., M. Muthukrishna, K. M. A. Chan, and T. Satterfield. 2015. Theories of the deep: combining salience and network analyses to produce mental model visualizations of a coastal British Columbia food web. Ecology and Society 20(4):42.http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-08094-200442
Testing for consensus on Kyrgyz rangelands
Open AccessJ Levine, Aiganysh Isaeva et al.ARTICLEConservation Ecology2019Cited by: 1
Levine, J., A. Isaeva, H. Zerriffi, I. M. S. Eddy, M. Foggin, S. E. Gergel, and S. M. Hagerman. 2019. Testing for consensus on Kyrgyz rangelands: local perceptions in Naryn oblast. Ecology and Society 24(4):36. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-11222-240436
Design and impact evaluation of a digital reproductive health program in Rwanda using a cluster randomized design
Open AccessCara Nolan, Laura J Packel et al.ARTICLEBMC Public Health2020
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04198272 . Prospectively registered 13 December 2019