Anuradha Saksena

Biographic Data

ID732769
NAMEAnuradha Saksena
GIVEN NAMESAnuradha
FAMILY NAMESaksena
SIGNATURESAKSENA A
VERIFIEDNo
TOTAL WORKS11
TOTAL CITATIONS16
AUTHOR COUNT11
EDITOR COUNT0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR1975
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR1985
H-INDEX2

  • Verb agreement in Hindi, part II

    Open AccessAnuradha SaksenaARTICLELinguistics1985

  • A semantic model of causative paradigms

    Open AccessAnuradha SaksenaARTICLELingua1983References: 2

  • A case marking constraint

    Open AccessAnuradha SaksenaARTICLELingua1983Cited by: 1References: 5

  • The basicness of transitives

    Open AccessAnuradha SaksenaARTICLEJournal of Linguistics1982Cited by: 1

    This paper raises the question whether transitive or intransitive semantics is the more basic. Recently, the transformational analysis of causatives (Lakoff, 1970; McCawley, 1968) has proposed that transitives are derived from intransitives by a causative transformation — thus implying that intransitive semantics is more basic. Because the transformational model has been so influential 2 this claim has been carried over, often unquestioningly, in…

  • Case marking semantics

    Open AccessAnuradha SaksenaARTICLELingua1982Cited by: 1References: 3

  • Contact in Causation

    Anuradha SaksenaARTICLELanguage1982

    The distinction between contactive and non-contactive causation shows up repeatedly in languages (Masica 1976, Chap. 3; Cole 1976), and is claimed by Xolodovič 1969 to be ‘fundamental’ in their description. Arguing against earlier descriptions, this paper provides an alternate analysis of this important contrast

  • Verb agreement in Hindi

    Open AccessAnuradha SaksenaARTICLELinguistics1981

  • The source of causative contrast

    Open AccessAnuradha SaksenaARTICLELingua1980References: 1

  • The Affected Agent

    Anuradha SaksenaARTICLELanguage1980Cited by: 8

    It is commonly believed that agents constitute a single primitive category, distinct from other categories such as patient. This paper challenges such an assumption, arriving at three conclusions: (a) A variety of rules classify agents into affected vs. non-affected types. (b) These rules group affected agents with other affected roles such as patient, dative, and experiencer. (c) The affected/non-affected distinction is more basic than role dist…

  • A reanalysis of the passive in Hindi

    Open AccessAnuradha SaksenaARTICLELingua1978Cited by: 2References: 1

  • A Case Grammar of Hindi (With a Special Reference to the Causative Sentences)

    Anuradha Saksena, Lakshmi Bai BalachandranARTICLELanguage1975Cited by: 3