Heidi Chamberlin Giannini
Biographic Data
| ID | 7337402 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Heidi Chamberlin Giannini |
| GIVEN NAMES | Heidi Chamberlin |
| FAMILY NAME | Giannini |
| SIGNATURE | GIANNINI H C |
| AFFILIATIONS | A.P. Giannini Foundation |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 2 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 0 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 2 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2017 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2018 |
| H-INDEX | 0 |
Clearing Up Some Misunderstandings
Much of Barnes’s critique depends on a misunderstanding of my position and, where we do substantively disagree, Barnes’s arguments fail to take into account important distinctions. As a result, his arguments are not persuasive. In my reply, I begin by clarifying my position and then proceed to address specific points of disagreement, identifying those distinctions that Barnes needs to take into account in critiquing my view
Hope as Grounds for Forgiveness
It is widely assumed that Christianity enjoins its followers to practice universal, unconditional forgiveness. But universal, unconditional forgiveness is regarded by many as morally problematic. Some Christian scholars have denied that Christianity in fact requires universal, unconditional forgiveness, but I believe they are mistaken. In this essay, I show two things: (1) that Christianity does enjoin universal, unconditional forgiveness of a ce…
No prominent works on this page.
Hope as Grounds for Forgiveness
It is widely assumed that Christianity enjoins its followers to practice universal, unconditional forgiveness. But universal, unconditional forgiveness is regarded by many as morally problematic. Some Christian scholars have denied that Christianity in fact requires universal, unconditional forgiveness, but I believe they are mistaken. In this essay, I show two things: (1) that Christianity does enjoin universal, unconditional forgiveness of a ce…
Clearing Up Some Misunderstandings
Much of Barnes’s critique depends on a misunderstanding of my position and, where we do substantively disagree, Barnes’s arguments fail to take into account important distinctions. As a result, his arguments are not persuasive. In my reply, I begin by clarifying my position and then proceed to address specific points of disagreement, identifying those distinctions that Barnes needs to take into account in critiquing my view
Epistemology (2 works) · Philosophy (2 works) · Philosophy (2 works) · Christianity (1 work) · Clearing (1 work) · Creatures (1 work) · Economics (1 work) · Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (1 work) · Forgiveness (1 work) · Forgiveness and Related Behaviors (1 work)