Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

David Peplow

Biographic Data

ID738515
NAMEDavid Peplow
GIVEN NAMESDavid
FAMILY NAMEPeplow
SIGNATUREPEPLOW D
AFFILIATIONSSheffield Hallam University
ORCID0000-0001-6535-8095
VERIFIEDYes
TOTAL WORKS8
TOTAL CITATIONS18
WORKS AS AUTHOR8
WORKS AS EDITOR0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR2015
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2025
H-INDEX2
  • Balancing Legitimacies

    Open Access•Jake Phillips, David Peplow et al.•ARTICLE•The British Journal of Criminology•2025•References: 24

    This article examines the transformation of parole oral hearings in England and Wales following their shift to remote delivery. Drawing on qualitative interviews and hearing transcripts, it explores how remote hearings affect the legitimacy of parole, focusing on tensions between efficiency, fairness and participation. Using a framework of legitimacy underpinned by Suchman’s concept of procedural, consequential and pragmatic legitimacy, the artic…

  • Held to account

    Open Access•David Peplow, Jake Phillips•ARTICLE•Language in Society•2025•Cited by: 2•References: 34

    This article analyses the use of adversarial questions in oral hearings conducted by the Parole Board of England and Wales. This is important because the Board is supposed to use an inquisitorial approach to oral hearings, so adversarial questions are examples of where Parole Board members deviate from this norm. The article outlines the work of the Parole Board, the process for carrying out oral hearings and the recent move to increased remote h…

  • Remote parole oral hearings

    Open Access•David Peplow, Jake Phillips•ARTICLE•Criminology & Criminal Justice•2023•Cited by: 2•References: 10

    The Parole Board (PB) is responsible for deciding whether some prisoners are safe to be released into the community. COVID-19 accelerated the PB’s move towards using remote oral hearings. Little is known about how this shift towards remote working has impacted the work of the PB and prisoners. In this article, we present the findings from a study that sought to understand the differences between remote and in-person hearings. Through analysis of …

  • Interpreting real and fictional worlds in interaction

    Sara Whiteley, David Peplow•ARTICLE•Text and Talk•2020

    This paper analyses how representations of real life and fictional worlds are combined and differentiated in the talk produced in literary reading groups. We adopt a socio-cognitive approach to reading group interaction, which combines discourse analysis and Text World Theory to examine the social and cognitive processes enacted in examples of such talk. Text World Theory is a cognitive linguistic discourse analysis framework which examines the m…

  • Storytelling and stance-taking in group interaction

    Open Access•David Peplow•ARTICLE•Narrative Inquiry•2020•Cited by: 1•References: 13

    This paper looks at two highly prevalent actions in naturally-occurring talk: stance-taking and storytelling. Stance-taking and storytelling have been shown to co-occur often (e.g. Siromaa, 2012 ), and this is especially the case in reading group talk, a discursive environment in which speakers are engaged in the joint enterprise of assessing the meaning and quality of a shared object: a written narrative text (e.g. a novel). Insights from conver…

  • It’s not the fact they claim benefits but their useless, lazy, drug taking lifestyles we despise’

    Open Access•Isabelle Van Der Bom, Laura L Paterson et al.•ARTICLE•Discourse Context & Media•2017•Cited by: 4•References: 8

  • Stylistics and real readers

    David Peplow, Robert M Carter et al.•CHAPTER•Routledge Handbook of Stylistics•2015

    Stylistics has long claimed to be an empirical method of literary analysis. One aspect of this empiricism is stylistics’ commitment to studying the effect of texts on readers. Short (1996, p. 6) emphasises the reader-centred nature of stylistics, stating that researchers in the fi eld are ‘profoundly interested in the rules and procedures which we, as readers, intuitively know and apply in order to understand what we read’. In reality, however, s…

  • Negotiating stance within discourses of class

    Open Access•Laura L Paterson, Laura Coffey-Glover et al.•ARTICLE•Discourse & Society•2015•Cited by: 9•References: 4

    In this article, we examine the way that audiences respond to particular representations of poverty. Using clips from the Channel 4 television programme Benefits Street we conducted focus groups in four locations across the United Kingdom, working with people from different socioeconomic backgrounds who had different experiences with the benefits system. Benefits Street (2014) is an example of reality television where members of the public are fo…

  • Negotiating stance within discourses of class

    Open Access•Laura L Paterson, Laura Coffey-Glover et al.•ARTICLE•Discourse & Society•2015•Cited by: 9•References: 4

    In this article, we examine the way that audiences respond to particular representations of poverty. Using clips from the Channel 4 television programme Benefits Street we conducted focus groups in four locations across the United Kingdom, working with people from different socioeconomic backgrounds who had different experiences with the benefits system. Benefits Street (2014) is an example of reality television where members of the public are fo…

  • It’s not the fact they claim benefits but their useless, lazy, drug taking lifestyles we despise’

    Open Access•Isabelle Van Der Bom, Laura L Paterson et al.•ARTICLE•Discourse Context & Media•2017•Cited by: 4•References: 8

  • Held to account

    Open Access•David Peplow, Jake Phillips•ARTICLE•Language in Society•2025•Cited by: 2•References: 34

    This article analyses the use of adversarial questions in oral hearings conducted by the Parole Board of England and Wales. This is important because the Board is supposed to use an inquisitorial approach to oral hearings, so adversarial questions are examples of where Parole Board members deviate from this norm. The article outlines the work of the Parole Board, the process for carrying out oral hearings and the recent move to increased remote h…

  • Remote parole oral hearings

    Open Access•David Peplow, Jake Phillips•ARTICLE•Criminology & Criminal Justice•2023•Cited by: 2•References: 10

    The Parole Board (PB) is responsible for deciding whether some prisoners are safe to be released into the community. COVID-19 accelerated the PB’s move towards using remote oral hearings. Little is known about how this shift towards remote working has impacted the work of the PB and prisoners. In this article, we present the findings from a study that sought to understand the differences between remote and in-person hearings. Through analysis of …

  • Storytelling and stance-taking in group interaction

    Open Access•David Peplow•ARTICLE•Narrative Inquiry•2020•Cited by: 1•References: 13

    This paper looks at two highly prevalent actions in naturally-occurring talk: stance-taking and storytelling. Stance-taking and storytelling have been shown to co-occur often (e.g. Siromaa, 2012 ), and this is especially the case in reading group talk, a discursive environment in which speakers are engaged in the joint enterprise of assessing the meaning and quality of a shared object: a written narrative text (e.g. a novel). Insights from conver…

  • Stylistics and real readers

    David Peplow, Robert M Carter et al.•CHAPTER•Routledge Handbook of Stylistics•2015

    Stylistics has long claimed to be an empirical method of literary analysis. One aspect of this empiricism is stylistics’ commitment to studying the effect of texts on readers. Short (1996, p. 6) emphasises the reader-centred nature of stylistics, stating that researchers in the fi eld are ‘profoundly interested in the rules and procedures which we, as readers, intuitively know and apply in order to understand what we read’. In reality, however, s…

  • Negotiating stance within discourses of class

    Open Access•Laura L Paterson, Laura Coffey-Glover et al.•ARTICLE•Discourse & Society•2015•Cited by: 9•References: 4

    In this article, we examine the way that audiences respond to particular representations of poverty. Using clips from the Channel 4 television programme Benefits Street we conducted focus groups in four locations across the United Kingdom, working with people from different socioeconomic backgrounds who had different experiences with the benefits system. Benefits Street (2014) is an example of reality television where members of the public are fo…

  • It’s not the fact they claim benefits but their useless, lazy, drug taking lifestyles we despise’

    Open Access•Isabelle Van Der Bom, Laura L Paterson et al.•ARTICLE•Discourse Context & Media•2017•Cited by: 4•References: 8

  • Interpreting real and fictional worlds in interaction

    Sara Whiteley, David Peplow•ARTICLE•Text and Talk•2020

    This paper analyses how representations of real life and fictional worlds are combined and differentiated in the talk produced in literary reading groups. We adopt a socio-cognitive approach to reading group interaction, which combines discourse analysis and Text World Theory to examine the social and cognitive processes enacted in examples of such talk. Text World Theory is a cognitive linguistic discourse analysis framework which examines the m…

  • Storytelling and stance-taking in group interaction

    Open Access•David Peplow•ARTICLE•Narrative Inquiry•2020•Cited by: 1•References: 13

    This paper looks at two highly prevalent actions in naturally-occurring talk: stance-taking and storytelling. Stance-taking and storytelling have been shown to co-occur often (e.g. Siromaa, 2012 ), and this is especially the case in reading group talk, a discursive environment in which speakers are engaged in the joint enterprise of assessing the meaning and quality of a shared object: a written narrative text (e.g. a novel). Insights from conver…

  • Remote parole oral hearings

    Open Access•David Peplow, Jake Phillips•ARTICLE•Criminology & Criminal Justice•2023•Cited by: 2•References: 10

    The Parole Board (PB) is responsible for deciding whether some prisoners are safe to be released into the community. COVID-19 accelerated the PB’s move towards using remote oral hearings. Little is known about how this shift towards remote working has impacted the work of the PB and prisoners. In this article, we present the findings from a study that sought to understand the differences between remote and in-person hearings. Through analysis of …

  • Balancing Legitimacies

    Open Access•Jake Phillips, David Peplow et al.•ARTICLE•The British Journal of Criminology•2025•References: 24

    This article examines the transformation of parole oral hearings in England and Wales following their shift to remote delivery. Drawing on qualitative interviews and hearing transcripts, it explores how remote hearings affect the legitimacy of parole, focusing on tensions between efficiency, fairness and participation. Using a framework of legitimacy underpinned by Suchman’s concept of procedural, consequential and pragmatic legitimacy, the artic…

  • Held to account

    Open Access•David Peplow, Jake Phillips•ARTICLE•Language in Society•2025•Cited by: 2•References: 34

    This article analyses the use of adversarial questions in oral hearings conducted by the Parole Board of England and Wales. This is important because the Board is supposed to use an inquisitorial approach to oral hearings, so adversarial questions are examples of where Parole Board members deviate from this norm. The article outlines the work of the Parole Board, the process for carrying out oral hearings and the recent move to increased remote h…

Psychology (6 works) · Sociology (5 works) · Discourse Analysis in Language Studies (4 works) · Political science (4 works) · Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (3 works) · Law (3 works) · Linguistics (3 works) · Philosophy (3 works) · Social Psychology (3 works) · Deception detection and forensic psychology (2 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae