Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Michael Hancher

Biographic Data

ID739102
NAMEMichael Hancher
GIVEN NAMESMichael
FAMILY NAMEHancher
SIGNATUREHANCHER M
AFFILIATIONSUniversity of Minnesota
VERIFIEDNo
TOTAL WORKS8
TOTAL CITATIONS53
AUTHOR COUNT8
EDITOR COUNT0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR1970
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2021
H-INDEX2
  • Seeing and Tagging Things in Pictures

    Michael Hancher•ARTICLE•Representations•2021•Cited by: 1•References: 7

    Despite modernist precepts, digital projects that use crowdsourcing to annotate large collections of images of paintings and book illustrations with "tags" have encouraged viewers to see things in pictures and to say what they see. Both personal image tagging (ekphrastic in function) and automatic image tagging challenge in different ways the proposition that a painting as such will elide recognizable content

  • College English in India: The First Textbook

    Open Access•Michael Hancher•ARTICLE•Victorian Literature and Culture•2014•References: 2

    In her groundbreaking book Masks of Conquest: Literary Study and British Rule in India (1989), Guari Viswanathan established that “the discipline of English came into its own” not in England but in India, as an instrument of cultural colonization: “As early as the 1820s, when the classical curriculum reigned supreme in England despite the strenuous efforts of some concerned critics to loosen its hold, English as the study of culture and not simpl…

  • What kind of speech act is interpretation

    Open Access•Michael Hancher•ARTICLE•Poetics•1981•References: 17

  • The classification of cooperative illocutionary acts

    Open Access•Michael Hancher•ARTICLE•Language in Society•1979•Cited by: 47•References: 7

    The different taxonomies of illocutionary acts proposed by Austin, Searle, Vendler, Ohmann, and Fraser are compared in summary form, with Searle's taxonomy taken as a reference standard. All five of these taxonomies slight two kinds of illocutionary act: (I) illocutionary acts that combine commissive with directive illocutionary force (e.g., offering, inviting, challenging), and (2) illocutionary acts that require two participants (e.g., giving, …

  • Beyond a Speech-Act Theory of Literary Discourse

    Michael Hancher, Mary Louise Pratt•ARTICLE•Modern Language Notes•1977•Cited by: 2

  • Three Kinds of Intention

    Michael Hancher•ARTICLE•Modern Language Notes•1972•Cited by: 2

  • Poetic Statement and Critical Dogma

    Michael Hancher, Gerald Graff•ARTICLE•Modern Language Notes•1971

  • The Science of Interpretation, and the Art of Interpretation

    Michael Hancher•ARTICLE•Modern Language Notes•1970•Cited by: 1

  • The classification of cooperative illocutionary acts

    Open Access•Michael Hancher•ARTICLE•Language in Society•1979•Cited by: 47•References: 7

    The different taxonomies of illocutionary acts proposed by Austin, Searle, Vendler, Ohmann, and Fraser are compared in summary form, with Searle's taxonomy taken as a reference standard. All five of these taxonomies slight two kinds of illocutionary act: (I) illocutionary acts that combine commissive with directive illocutionary force (e.g., offering, inviting, challenging), and (2) illocutionary acts that require two participants (e.g., giving, …

  • Beyond a Speech-Act Theory of Literary Discourse

    Michael Hancher, Mary Louise Pratt•ARTICLE•Modern Language Notes•1977•Cited by: 2

  • Three Kinds of Intention

    Michael Hancher•ARTICLE•Modern Language Notes•1972•Cited by: 2

  • Seeing and Tagging Things in Pictures

    Michael Hancher•ARTICLE•Representations•2021•Cited by: 1•References: 7

    Despite modernist precepts, digital projects that use crowdsourcing to annotate large collections of images of paintings and book illustrations with "tags" have encouraged viewers to see things in pictures and to say what they see. Both personal image tagging (ekphrastic in function) and automatic image tagging challenge in different ways the proposition that a painting as such will elide recognizable content

  • The Science of Interpretation, and the Art of Interpretation

    Michael Hancher•ARTICLE•Modern Language Notes•1970•Cited by: 1

  • The Science of Interpretation, and the Art of Interpretation

    Michael Hancher•ARTICLE•Modern Language Notes•1970•Cited by: 1

  • Poetic Statement and Critical Dogma

    Michael Hancher, Gerald Graff•ARTICLE•Modern Language Notes•1971

  • Three Kinds of Intention

    Michael Hancher•ARTICLE•Modern Language Notes•1972•Cited by: 2

  • Beyond a Speech-Act Theory of Literary Discourse

    Michael Hancher, Mary Louise Pratt•ARTICLE•Modern Language Notes•1977•Cited by: 2

  • The classification of cooperative illocutionary acts

    Open Access•Michael Hancher•ARTICLE•Language in Society•1979•Cited by: 47•References: 7

    The different taxonomies of illocutionary acts proposed by Austin, Searle, Vendler, Ohmann, and Fraser are compared in summary form, with Searle's taxonomy taken as a reference standard. All five of these taxonomies slight two kinds of illocutionary act: (I) illocutionary acts that combine commissive with directive illocutionary force (e.g., offering, inviting, challenging), and (2) illocutionary acts that require two participants (e.g., giving, …

  • What kind of speech act is interpretation

    Open Access•Michael Hancher•ARTICLE•Poetics•1981•References: 17

  • College English in India: The First Textbook

    Open Access•Michael Hancher•ARTICLE•Victorian Literature and Culture•2014•References: 2

    In her groundbreaking book Masks of Conquest: Literary Study and British Rule in India (1989), Guari Viswanathan established that “the discipline of English came into its own” not in England but in India, as an instrument of cultural colonization: “As early as the 1820s, when the classical curriculum reigned supreme in England despite the strenuous efforts of some concerned critics to loosen its hold, English as the study of culture and not simpl…

  • Seeing and Tagging Things in Pictures

    Michael Hancher•ARTICLE•Representations•2021•Cited by: 1•References: 7

    Despite modernist precepts, digital projects that use crowdsourcing to annotate large collections of images of paintings and book illustrations with "tags" have encouraged viewers to see things in pictures and to say what they see. Both personal image tagging (ekphrastic in function) and automatic image tagging challenge in different ways the proposition that a painting as such will elide recognizable content

Philosophy (6 works) · Art (5 works) · Linguistics (4 works) · Epistemology (3 works) · Literature (3 works) · Speech act (3 works) · Art history (2 works) · Computer Science (2 works) · Indirect speech (2 works) · Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (2 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae