Gerald F Hyman
Biographic Data
| ID | 749659 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Gerald F Hyman |
| GIVEN NAMES | Gerald F |
| FAMILY NAME | Hyman |
| SIGNATURE | HYMAN G F |
| AFFILIATIONS | Senior Associate (non‐resident), Center for Strategic and International Studies; Member, Advisory Council to the Center for International Media Assistance of the National Endowment for Democracy; Former Director, Office of Democracy and Governance, USAID |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 3 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 5 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 3 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2002 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2016 |
| H-INDEX | 1 |
The Middle East and the Next Administration: Challenges, Opportunities and Recommendations
Ambivalence Leads to Limited Relevance
Debating the Transition Paradigm: Tilting at Straw Men
Although Thomas Carothers's critique of democracy promoters in the January 2002 Journal of Democracy was, in principle, directed at donors in general, all the examples and citations referred exclusively to the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID). Carothers's critique would be trenchant, even devastating, if it accurately portrayed USAID's thinking on democracy. But it does not. 1 The article characterizes USAID's democracy practitio…
Debating the Transition Paradigm: Tilting at Straw Men
Although Thomas Carothers's critique of democracy promoters in the January 2002 Journal of Democracy was, in principle, directed at donors in general, all the examples and citations referred exclusively to the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID). Carothers's critique would be trenchant, even devastating, if it accurately portrayed USAID's thinking on democracy. But it does not. 1 The article characterizes USAID's democracy practitio…
Ambivalence Leads to Limited Relevance
Debating the Transition Paradigm: Tilting at Straw Men
Although Thomas Carothers's critique of democracy promoters in the January 2002 Journal of Democracy was, in principle, directed at donors in general, all the examples and citations referred exclusively to the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID). Carothers's critique would be trenchant, even devastating, if it accurately portrayed USAID's thinking on democracy. But it does not. 1 The article characterizes USAID's democracy practitio…
Ambivalence Leads to Limited Relevance
The Middle East and the Next Administration: Challenges, Opportunities and Recommendations
Law (3 works) · Political science (3 works) · Democracy (2 works) · Law (2 works) · Politics (2 works) · Sociology (2 works) · Administration (probate law (1 works) · Agency (philosophy (1 works) · Ambivalence (1 works) · Commission (1 works)