Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Megan S Wright

Biographic Data

ID7519619
NAMEMegan S Wright
GIVEN NAMESMegan S
FAMILY NAMEWright
SIGNATUREWRIGHT M S
AFFILIATIONSPennsylvania State University
ORCID0009-0008-2033-6317
VERIFIEDYes
TOTAL WORKS7
TOTAL CITATIONS0
WORKS AS AUTHOR7
WORKS AS EDITOR0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR2018
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2026
H-INDEX0
  • Neurotechnology Governance in the United States

    Open Access•L Y Cabrera, Nia Evereteze et al.•ARTICLE•Bioethics•2026

    Neuroscience's accelerating advances have reached a pivotal point in the study of the human brain, including neurotechnologies capable of recording large amounts of data and acting with greater precision. However, the use of neurotechnology has raised a number of ethical, legal, and social implications (ELSI). To that end, sufficiently robust policy and governance structures must be considered. To date, no published review of United States polici…

  • Subject and Family Perspectives from the Central Thalamic Deep Brain Stimulation Trial for Traumatic Brain Injury

    Open Access•Joseph J Fins, Megan S Wright et al.•ARTICLE•Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare…•2024

    This is the second paper in a two-part series describing subject and family perspectives from the CENTURY-S (CENtral Thalamic Deep Brain Stimulation for the Treatment of Traumatic Brain InjURY-Safety) first-in-human invasive neurological device trial to achieve cognitive restoration in moderate to severe traumatic brain injury (msTBI). To participate, subjects were independently assessed to formally establish decision-making capacity to provide v…

  • Identity Theft, Deep Brain Stimulation, and the Primacy of Post‐trial Obligations

    Open Access•Joseph J Fins, Amanda R Merner et al.•ARTICLE•The Hastings Center Report•2024

    Patient narratives from two investigational deep brain stimulation trials for traumatic brain injury and obsessive‐compulsive disorder reveal that injury and illness rob individuals of personal identity and that neuromodulation can restore it. The early success of these interventions makes a compelling case for continued post‐trial access to these technologies. Given the centrality of personal identity to respect for persons, a failure to provide…

  • What Can the Health Humanities Contribute to Our Societal Understanding of and Response to the Deaths of Despair Crisis

    Open Access•Daniel R George, Benjamin M Studebaker et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Medical Humanities•2023

  • Subject and Family Perspectives from the Central Thalamic Deep Brain Stimulation for Traumatic Brain Injury Study

    Open Access•Joseph J Fins, Megan S Wright et al.•ARTICLE•Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare…•2022

    This is the first article in a two-part series describing subject and family perspectives from the central thalamic deep brain stimulation for the treatment of traumatic brain injury using the Medtronic PC + S first-in-human invasive neurological device trial to achieve cognitive restoration in moderate to severe traumatic brain injury, with subjects who were deemed capable of providing voluntary informed consent. In this article, we report on in…

  • Covid-19 vaccine dissemination

    Open Access•C L Richardson, Megan S Wright et al.•ARTICLE•Ethics Medicine and Public Health•2022

  • Change without Change? Assessing Medicare Reimbursement for Advance Care Planning

    Open Access•Megan S Wright•ARTICLE•The Hastings Center Report•2018

    In January 2016, Medicare began reimbursing clinicians for time spent engaging in advance care planning with their patients or patients’ surrogates. Such planning involves discussions of the care an individual would want to receive should he or she one day lose the capacity to make health care decisions or have conversations with a surrogate about, for example, end‐of‐life wishes. Clinicians can be reimbursed for face‐to‐face explanation and disc…

No prominent works on this page.

  • Change without Change? Assessing Medicare Reimbursement for Advance Care Planning

    Open Access•Megan S Wright•ARTICLE•The Hastings Center Report•2018

    In January 2016, Medicare began reimbursing clinicians for time spent engaging in advance care planning with their patients or patients’ surrogates. Such planning involves discussions of the care an individual would want to receive should he or she one day lose the capacity to make health care decisions or have conversations with a surrogate about, for example, end‐of‐life wishes. Clinicians can be reimbursed for face‐to‐face explanation and disc…

  • Subject and Family Perspectives from the Central Thalamic Deep Brain Stimulation for Traumatic Brain Injury Study

    Open Access•Joseph J Fins, Megan S Wright et al.•ARTICLE•Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare…•2022

    This is the first article in a two-part series describing subject and family perspectives from the central thalamic deep brain stimulation for the treatment of traumatic brain injury using the Medtronic PC + S first-in-human invasive neurological device trial to achieve cognitive restoration in moderate to severe traumatic brain injury, with subjects who were deemed capable of providing voluntary informed consent. In this article, we report on in…

  • Covid-19 vaccine dissemination

    Open Access•C L Richardson, Megan S Wright et al.•ARTICLE•Ethics Medicine and Public Health•2022

  • What Can the Health Humanities Contribute to Our Societal Understanding of and Response to the Deaths of Despair Crisis

    Open Access•Daniel R George, Benjamin M Studebaker et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Medical Humanities•2023

  • Subject and Family Perspectives from the Central Thalamic Deep Brain Stimulation Trial for Traumatic Brain Injury

    Open Access•Joseph J Fins, Megan S Wright et al.•ARTICLE•Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare…•2024

    This is the second paper in a two-part series describing subject and family perspectives from the CENTURY-S (CENtral Thalamic Deep Brain Stimulation for the Treatment of Traumatic Brain InjURY-Safety) first-in-human invasive neurological device trial to achieve cognitive restoration in moderate to severe traumatic brain injury (msTBI). To participate, subjects were independently assessed to formally establish decision-making capacity to provide v…

  • Identity Theft, Deep Brain Stimulation, and the Primacy of Post‐trial Obligations

    Open Access•Joseph J Fins, Amanda R Merner et al.•ARTICLE•The Hastings Center Report•2024

    Patient narratives from two investigational deep brain stimulation trials for traumatic brain injury and obsessive‐compulsive disorder reveal that injury and illness rob individuals of personal identity and that neuromodulation can restore it. The early success of these interventions makes a compelling case for continued post‐trial access to these technologies. Given the centrality of personal identity to respect for persons, a failure to provide…

  • Neurotechnology Governance in the United States

    Open Access•L Y Cabrera, Nia Evereteze et al.•ARTICLE•Bioethics•2026

    Neuroscience's accelerating advances have reached a pivotal point in the study of the human brain, including neurotechnologies capable of recording large amounts of data and acting with greater precision. However, the use of neurotechnology has raised a number of ethical, legal, and social implications (ELSI). To that end, sufficiently robust policy and governance structures must be considered. To date, no published review of United States polici…

Medicine (4 works) · Political science (4 works) · Law (3 works) · Psychiatry (3 works) · Psychology (3 works) · Alternative medicine (2 works) · Business (2 works) · Health care (2 works) · Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (2 works) · Informed consent (2 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae