Konrad Banicki
Biographic Data
| ID | 7531973 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Konrad Banicki |
| GIVEN NAMES | Konrad |
| FAMILY NAME | Banicki |
| SIGNATURE | BANICKI K |
| AFFILIATIONS | Jagiellonian University |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-0855-4679 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 5 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 0 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 5 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2011 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2025 |
| H-INDEX | 0 |
Whose Evidence? Which Scientificity? Or Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy Caught Being Historically Contingent
Ancient Stoicism
The present chapter can be understood as a contribution to modern-day understanding of Stoicism. It is in such a context that, first, Pierre Hadot’s well-established reading of the latter in terms of spiritual exercises is introduced and subjected to critical examination. Then, in turn, some alternative accounts, developed by recent authors such as Donald Robertson and Jules Evans, are referred to, in which Stoic philosophy is explored as a kind …
Psychology, conceptual confusion, and disquieting situationism
In response to Lamiell’s (2018) commentary arising from my claim that both character and personality belong to “the discourse of individual differences” (Banicki, 2017, p. 56) some further clarifications are provided. At first, an interdisciplinary project lying behind my original article is sketched and the phrase “ individual differences” elucidated as having a non-technical meaning far broader than that connected with individual differences as…
The character–personality distinction
Many interdisciplinary discussions seem to operate on a tacit assumption that the notions of character and personality can be used interchangeably. In order to argue that such an assumption is at least partly erroneous, the character–personality distinction drawn in various contexts is systematically scrutinized both in an historical and conceptual way. Then, in turn, two particular issues are addressed. The character–personality distinction is s…
Connective conceptual analysis and psychology
Conceptual analysis, like any exclusively theoretical activity, is far from overrated in current psychology. Such a situation can be related both to the contingent influences of contextual and historical character and to the more essential metatheoretical reasons. After a short discussion of the latter it is argued that even within a strictly empirical psychology there are non-trivial tasks that can be attached to well-defined and methodologicall…
No prominent works on this page.
Connective conceptual analysis and psychology
Conceptual analysis, like any exclusively theoretical activity, is far from overrated in current psychology. Such a situation can be related both to the contingent influences of contextual and historical character and to the more essential metatheoretical reasons. After a short discussion of the latter it is argued that even within a strictly empirical psychology there are non-trivial tasks that can be attached to well-defined and methodologicall…
The character–personality distinction
Many interdisciplinary discussions seem to operate on a tacit assumption that the notions of character and personality can be used interchangeably. In order to argue that such an assumption is at least partly erroneous, the character–personality distinction drawn in various contexts is systematically scrutinized both in an historical and conceptual way. Then, in turn, two particular issues are addressed. The character–personality distinction is s…
Psychology, conceptual confusion, and disquieting situationism
In response to Lamiell’s (2018) commentary arising from my claim that both character and personality belong to “the discourse of individual differences” (Banicki, 2017, p. 56) some further clarifications are provided. At first, an interdisciplinary project lying behind my original article is sketched and the phrase “ individual differences” elucidated as having a non-technical meaning far broader than that connected with individual differences as…
Ancient Stoicism
The present chapter can be understood as a contribution to modern-day understanding of Stoicism. It is in such a context that, first, Pierre Hadot’s well-established reading of the latter in terms of spiritual exercises is introduced and subjected to critical examination. Then, in turn, some alternative accounts, developed by recent authors such as Donald Robertson and Jules Evans, are referred to, in which Stoic philosophy is explored as a kind …
Whose Evidence? Which Scientificity? Or Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy Caught Being Historically Contingent
Psychology (5 works) · Epistemology (4 works) · Philosophy (4 works) · Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology (3 works) · Cognitive psychology (3 works) · Cognition (2 works) · Personality (2 works) · Psychotherapist (2 works) · Social Psychology (2 works) · Social Representations and Identity (2 works)